On 11/01/2016 14:56, Sundararajan Athijegannathan wrote:
Incorporated the changes suggested. Updated webrev is @
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8068938/webrev.01/
This looks okay to me.
-Alan
java/util/concurrent/Phaser/Basic.java
This test has been moved from tier1 to tier2 (JDK-8142370) due to
JDK-8141031. JDK-8141031 has been resolved in b96, and after that, not
see this test fail. This patch is to move it back to tier1
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146762
webr
Hello,
I've recently was working on the bugfix for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140633 and as a result i got that
small fix. Also I've adopted presented in bugtracker test and done jtreg
test.
Here is patch. This is my first contribution try, so im probably missing
something.
# HG c
Hello,
I've recently was working on the bugfix for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140633 and as a result i got that
small fix. Also I've adopted presented in bugtracker test and done jtreg
test.
Here is patch. This is my first contribution try, so im probably missing
something.
# HG c
Thanks for doing this Amy. Reviewed.
-Chris.
> On 12 Jan 2016, at 10:09, Amy Lu wrote:
>
> java/util/concurrent/Phaser/Basic.java
>
> This test has been moved from tier1 to tier2 (JDK-8142370) due to
> JDK-8141031. JDK-8141031 has been resolved in b96, and after that, not see
> this test fai
On 11/01/2016 21:44, Iris Clark wrote:
Hi, Joe, Roger, Alan, Magnus, and Mandy.
At the end of December (shortly before the Christmas/Winter
break and my vacation), I provided responses to your messages
and an updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/verona/8072379/webrev.2/
I didn't
Hi Dmitry,
src/java.base/windows/native/libjli/java_md.c
1) use NULL
-GetModuleFileName(0, buf, bufsize);
+GetModuleFileName(NULL, buf, bufsize);
2) extra LF ?
+ * Removes the trailing file name and one sub-folder from a path.
+ *
+ * If buf is "c:\foo\bin\javac", then put "c:\foo"
Webrev updated in-place, moved to sun.awt.utli ( desktop module )
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8146735/
-Chris.
On 11 Jan 2016, at 22:44, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>> On 11 Jan 2016, at 21:27, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2016, at 1:19 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>>
>>> In prepa
On 01/07/2016 02:21 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> A stupid benchmark (sorry Aleksey - maybe you already have a jmh
> version of this?) http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/Utf8Bench.java
Okay, I'll bite:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/scratch/UTF8Scan.java
As Andrew already pointed out, the tri
Please review an update to a CleanerTest; the 4m limit is not needed
and causes a problem when run with CompressedOops
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-cleanertest-8146671/
Issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146671
Thanks, Roger
> On Jan 12, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
> Webrev updated in-place, moved to sun.awt.utli ( desktop module )
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8146735/
This looks fine. Good to see it moved to java.desktop.
Mandy
> On Jan 11, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Iris Clark wrote:
>
> Hi, Joe, Roger, Alan, Magnus, and Mandy.
>
> At the end of December (shortly before the Christmas/Winter
> break and my vacation), I provided responses to your messages
> and an updated webrev:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/verona/
Hi Martin, Vladimir,
It was suggested that this patch be tested on localized Windows machines
and/or
trying with the various Windows native encodings, appreciate if you can
verify
this as well.
Thanks
Kumar
On 1/11/2016 1:10 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Hi,
Was on vacation, I started to pre
I note that JavaFX optionally uses sun.misc.PerformanceLogger this in
one place (via reflection). We'll need to file a new issue to clean this up.
-- Kevin
Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jan 12, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Webrev updated in-place, moved to sun.awt.utli ( desktop module )
Looks good, Roger.
-Joe
On 1/12/2016 1:31 PM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Please review an update to a CleanerTest; the 4m limit is not needed
and causes a problem when run with CompressedOops
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-cleanertest-8146671/
Issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.
Hi Iris,
Catching up on old reviews, the regular expression for versions is given as
^[1-9][0-9]*(((\.0)*\.[1-9][0-9]*)*)*$
Is this equivalent to
^[1-9][0-9]*(\.[0-9])*
Trying to put this in words, "The version number starts with a sequence
of digits where the leading digit is not "0
Please review a fix to the match method of RewriteSystem and RewriteUri
that resulted in an extra slash in the URI.
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk9/8146606/webrev/
Issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146606
Thanks,
Joe
17 matches
Mail list logo