RE: RFR(M): 8156915: introduce MethodHandle factory for array length

Hi, I just noticed that there is the @since missing in javadocs: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/fd39cefc5c8f#l3.13 arrayConstructor has @since 9, but arrayLength() not. Uwe - Uwe Schindler uschind...@apache.org ASF Member, Apache Lucene PMC / Committer Bremen, Germany http://l

Re: Review request 8153042: jdeps should continue to report JDK internal APIs that are removed/renamed in JDK 9

On 5/20/16 6:21 AM, Mandy Chung wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8153042/webrev.00/index.html Several JDK internal APIs have been removed JDK 9. It’d be helpful to continue to flag those internal APIs if they are used by existing libraries. This fix is an interim soluti

RE: RFR 8156718: Need tests for IsoFields getFrom for unsupported non-Iso Temporal fields

Hi Roger, Thanks for the comments. Earlier as part of JDK-8062804 we considered scenarios for support of isofields and non isofields (positive case to check isofield works and negative case to check UnsupportedTemporalTypeException is thrown only. Here is the updated webrev, I have added data

Re: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8157211: Mark tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java as intermittently failing

> On 20 May 2016, at 07:48, Hamlin Li wrote: > > Would you please help to review the code change? > +1 Paul. > Thank you > -Hamlin > > On 2016/5/18 12:52, Hamlin Li wrote: >> tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java >> This test is known to fail intermittently (JDK-8130392 >>

Re: RFR 8130023 API java.util.stream: explicitly specify guaranteed execution of the pipeline

> On 19 May 2016, at 12:02, Paul Sandoz wrote: > > >> On 17 May 2016, at 23:15, Claes Redestad wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> the first block in Stream.java bothers me: >> >> + * A stream implementation is permitted significant latitude in >> optimizing >> + * the computation of the result. For ex

RFR: 8157437 Typos in Stream JavaDoc

Hi, I introduced some typos in my haste to push the fix for JDK-8130023 (API java.util.stream: explicitly specify guaranteed execution of the pipeline) (I am reminded of the phrase “Go slow and you’ll get there faster”.) So to slow my self down i did a search for spelling errors in all of the s

Re: RFR: 8157437 Typos in Stream JavaDoc

Looks good. Thanks, -Aleksey On 05/20/2016 02:47 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: > Hi, > > I introduced some typos in my haste to push the fix for JDK-8130023 > (API java.util.stream: explicitly specify guaranteed execution of the > pipeline) (I am reminded of the phrase “Go slow and you’ll get t

Re: RFR: 8157437 Typos in Stream JavaDoc

On 20/05/2016 12:47, Paul Sandoz wrote: Hi, I introduced some typos in my haste to push the fix for JDK-8130023 (API java.util.stream: explicitly specify guaranteed execution of the pipeline) (I am reminded of the phrase “Go slow and you’ll get there faster”.) So to slow my self down i did

Re: RFR: 8157437 Typos in Stream JavaDoc

+1 > On May 20, 2016, at 7:47 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote: > > Hi, > > I introduced some typos in my haste to push the fix for JDK-8130023 > (API java.util.stream: explicitly specify guaranteed execution of the > pipeline) (I am reminded of the phrase “Go slow and you’ll get there faster”.) >

TreeMap specific override of putIfAbsent/merge

Hi all, TreeMap does not have its own specific overrides of Map methods that were added in java 8. In our specific usage we do what is effective a merge operation: For incoming K and V: 1. get value from map 2. if present - merge with incoming value V 3. if absent - associate K with V in the map

RFR: 8157449: Adjust link-time generated Species classes to match JDK-8148604 usage

Hi, I noticed that the BMH$Species classes generated at link time slightly mismatch the classes generated when concatenating things. Updating this to match reality helps mitigate a small fraction of the startup penalty to enabling the optimal string concatenation strategy: Bug: https://bugs.

Re: RFR: 8156484: ZipFile retains too much native memory from caching Inflaters

Hi Martin, On 05/20/2016 02:51 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote: On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Peter Levart wrote: So Martin, what do you think? I studied your code and we are fundamentally in agreement! ... Except for need for periodic cleanup of the cache... Maybe we should do CompletableFutur

Re: Review Request: 8157391: jdeps left JarFile open

> On May 19, 2016, at 11:39 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: > > > > On 20/05/2016 04:55, Mandy Chung wrote: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8157391/webrev.00/index.html >> >> tools/jdeps/modules/GenModuleInfo.java >> tools/jdeps/modules/TransitiveDeps.java >> tools/jdeps/modules/In

Re: TreeMap specific override of putIfAbsent/merge

Hi Tomasz, If there was any rejection it was probably due to time constraints than for any technical reasons. It should be easy to refactor the TreeMap.put implementation into say a private putVal accepting a boolean argument and both put and putIfAbsent call putVal (same pattern as in HashMap

Re: Review Request: 8157391: jdeps left JarFile open

> On May 20, 2016, at 7:24 AM, Mandy Chung wrote: > >> >> On May 19, 2016, at 11:39 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: >> >> >> >> On 20/05/2016 04:55, Mandy Chung wrote: >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8157391/webrev.00/index.html >>> >>> tools/jdeps/modules/GenModuleInfo.java >>

RFR: JDK-8143282: \p{Cn} unassigned code points should be included in \p{C}

Hi, Please help review the change for 8143282. issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8143282 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8143282 thanks, Sherman

Re: RFR: 8157449: Adjust link-time generated Species classes to match JDK-8148604 usage

On 05/20/2016 05:16 PM, Claes Redestad wrote: > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8157449/webrev.00/ Looks good. Thanks, -Aleksey

Re: RFR: JDK-8143282: \p{Cn} unassigned code points should be included in \p{C}

Here is a duplicate check: 4422 (Character.CONTROL == type || Character.CONTROL == type || I don't see any tests for corresponding p{Cn} I expected to see general category Other "C" in Character.java I'd like to see tests that p{C} is the same as p{Other} is the same as p{isOt

Re: RFR: JDK-8143282: \p{Cn} unassigned code points should be included in \p{C}

On 5/20/16 9:11 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote: Here is a duplicate check: 4422 (Character.CONTROL == type || Character.CONTROL == type || I don't see any tests for corresponding p{Cn} It appears we don't have any regex test for the gc in current test cases. Not a surprise thoug

RFR (JAXP) 8054632: [since-tag]: javadoc for xml classes has invalid @since tag

Hi, This patch applies similar change[1] made to the DOM sources under java.xml for those under jdk.xml.dom, replacing "@since DOM Level 2" with "@since 1.4, DOM Level 2", and adding "@since 1.4, DOM Level 2" to the ones (under html package) that missed the @since tag. JBS: https://bugs.open

Re: RFR: JDK-8143282: \p{Cn} unassigned code points should be included in \p{C}

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Xueming Shen wrote: > On 5/20/16 9:11 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote: >> >> Here is a duplicate check: >> >> 4422 (Character.CONTROL == type || Character.CONTROL >> == type || >> >> I don't see any tests for corresponding p{Cn} > > > It appears we don'

Re: RFR 8156718: Need tests for IsoFields getFrom for unsupported non-Iso Temporal fields

Hi Bhanu, Looks good. Thanks for including the tests of the values so the tests look complete. Roger On 5/20/2016 5:22 AM, Bhanu Gopularam wrote: Hi Roger, Thanks for the comments. Earlier as part of JDK-8062804 we considered scenarios for support of isofields and non isofields (positive

Re: RFR (JAXP) 8054632: [since-tag]: javadoc for xml classes has invalid @since tag

looks ok joe > On May 20, 2016, at 1:12 PM, huizhe wang wrote: > > Hi, > > This patch applies similar change[1] made to the DOM sources under java.xml > for those under jdk.xml.dom, replacing "@since DOM Level 2" with "@since 1.4, > DOM Level 2", and adding "@since 1.4, DOM Level 2" to the one

Re: RFR: JDK-8143282: \p{Cn} unassigned code points should be included in \p{C}

On 5/20/16 10:13 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Xueming Shen wrote: I expected to see general category Other "C" in Character.java can open a rfe for that if needed. Well, don't we want complete correspondence between Unicode standard, Character, and regex? Anyth

Re: RFR: JDK-8143282: \p{Cn} unassigned code points should be included in \p{C}

Consider your change reviewed if you fix the duplication here: +(Character.CONTROL == type || Character.CONTROL == type || On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Xueming Shen wrote: > it is more like a rfe now :-) Yup, that's a RFE!

Re: RFR: 8156484: ZipFile retains too much native memory from caching Inflaters

Peter, You keep impressing me with your development speed! Looking at ObjectPool ... looking pretty good keepalivetime should be > 0. (also very small keepalive times are a bad idea, but what's "very small"?) I'm thinking one second for ZipFile keep alive time. Thread pools have 60 seconds. Ma

Re: [9] RFR: 8152207: Perform array bound checks while getting a length of bytecode instructions

Hello, Could someone review this fix, please? http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asmotrak/8152207/hotspot/webrev.01/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asmotrak/8152207/jdk/webrev.00/ Artem On 05/10/2016 01:49 PM, Artem Smotrakov wrote: Hi Christian, Thank you for review. Here is updated webrev http://cr

Re: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-4851777 Add BigDecimal sqrt method

Hi Joe, I’ve a few comments / questions, mostly picayune. On May 19, 2016, at 11:43 PM, joe darcy wrote: > Please review the addition of BigDecimal.sqrt: > > JDK-4851777 Add BigDecimal sqrt method > >http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/4851777.5/ 2023 * The square root of a numbe

Re: RFR (JAXP) 8054632: [since-tag]: javadoc for xml classes has invalid @since tag

Thanks Lance! Joe On 5/20/2016 11:07 AM, Lance Andersen wrote: looks ok joe On May 20, 2016, at 1:12 PM, huizhe wang > wrote: Hi, This patch applies similar change[1] made to the DOM sources under java.xml for those under jdk.xml.dom, replacing "@since DOM Lev

Re: [PING] [9] RFR of 5100935: No way to access the 64-bit integer multiplication of 64-bit CPUs efficiently

Hello Andrew, Thank you for your comments. I went ahead and integrated the existing code as reviewed but created a new issue https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157485 to track the possible improvement you suggested. Thanks for citing the appropriate reference material as well. Cheers,

JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8157487: Mark ZoneId.java as intermittently failing

Hello, The test sun/net/www/protocol/http/ZoneId.java has been seen to intermittently fail (JDK-8085785) and should be marked accordingly. Please review the patch below which does this. Thanks, -Joe --- a/test/sun/net/www/protocol/http/ZoneId.javaFri May 20 14:41:41 2016 -0700 +++

Re: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8157487: Mark ZoneId.java as intermittently failing

Looks fine to me. Naoto On 5/20/16 2:55 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote: Hello, The test sun/net/www/protocol/http/ZoneId.java has been seen to intermittently fail (JDK-8085785) and should be marked accordingly. Please review the patch below which does this. Thanks, -Joe --- a/test/sun/net/

[9] RFR: Static build of libzip is missing JNI_OnLoad_zip entry point

Hello, Please review the fix to the following issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150179 The proposed fix is located at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8150179/webrev.00/ The fix is to simply bring the JNI OnLoad entry point back from ZipFile.c which was removed. Naoto

Re: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-4851777 Add BigDecimal sqrt method

Hi Brian, On 5/20/2016 1:39 PM, Brian Burkhalter wrote: Hi Joe, I’ve a few comments / questions, mostly picayune. On May 19, 2016, at 11:43 PM, joe darcy > wrote: Please review the addition of BigDecimal.sqrt: JDK-4851777 Add BigDecimal sqrt method http:/

RFR: 8157502: make docs broken after JDK-5100935

Hi, Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157502 make docs appears to be currently broken, fails with: --- # Running javadoc for support/javadoc/api/index.html .../jdk/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StrictMath.java:855: error: reference not found * @see Math#multiplyFull(l

Re: RFR: 8157502: make docs broken after JDK-5100935

Looks fine. On 21/05/2016 07:07, Jan Lahoda wrote: Hi, Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157502 make docs appears to be currently broken, fails with: --- # Running javadoc for support/javadoc/api/index.html .../jdk/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StrictMath.java:855: error: