Hello ,
looks like the generalization of the `includeInExceptions` security
property is now in jdk/jdk after
"8207846: Generalize the jdk.net.includeInExceptions security property"
was added, great news and thanks to Chris for driving this !
I use this security property now as well
Well, given the lack of any further input I am left wondering, JEP
neophyte that I am, whether:
i) said happy lacuna implies that it is appropriate to submit this JEP
(as prompted by both the process blurb provided in JEP 1 and the
accordingly labelled button in the JEP JIRA interface)
or
ii
Hi,
Please review this cleanup fix for 8208560
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208560
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nishjain/8208560/webrev.00/
Cause and Fix: Changes made for JDK-8021322 has left some unused static
fields, not sure why these fields have package private ac
Hi Maurizio,
thank you for fixing this. I tested it and it works. I did not dive
deeply into the issue, but your changes look like they do what you
claim they do.
Thanks, Thomas
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
> Hi,
> support for IntelliJ projects (both langtools spe
Looks fine.
On 7/31/18 4:27 AM, Nishit Jain wrote:
Hi,
Please review this cleanup fix for 8208560
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208560
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nishjain/8208560/webrev.00/
Cause and Fix: Changes made for JDK-8021322 has left some unused
static fiel
Thanks for testing and reviewing Thomas!
P.S.
I'll be pushing shortly another RFR in code tools for the jtreg plugin
source code, which is also broken by the latest IJ update.
Cheers
Maurizio
On 31/07/18 14:36, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Hi Maurizio,
thank you for fixing this. I tested it and it
Hi Andrew,
The JEP is clear on the concept and has many more details than are necessary
to submit it. Supplying so much detail at the earliest stage invites more
discussion about the implementation than the concept.
Usually, the details of API and implementation are added as the JEP
progresses
+1
Naoto
On 7/31/18 7:57 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Looks fine.
On 7/31/18 4:27 AM, Nishit Jain wrote:
Hi,
Please review this cleanup fix for 8208560
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208560
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nishjain/8208560/webrev.00/
Cause and Fix: Changes mad
OK, great.
It looks like a heavily modified version of ArrayDeque.java. This makes it a bit
difficult to understand what the changes are. Would you mind if I rehosted this
to cr.openjdk.java.net and generated a webrev for it?
Thanks,
s'marks
On 7/28/18 11:05 PM, Alex Foster wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Does anyone have any further comments on this?
Is there anyone willing to volunteer to build and test it on AIX?
Thanks,
Brian
On Jul 30, 2018, at 1:35 PM, Brian Burkhalter
wrote:
> Hi Bernard,
>
> Yes we agree. I believe I already had that change to those two files in the
> revised (
Sure, I don't mind. I would have done that myself but I don't think I have
access to upload to cr.openjdk.java.net.
Alex
From: Stuart Marks
Sent: July 31, 2018 2:40 PM
To: Alex Foster
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: 8143850: retrofit ArrayDeque
Hi Alex,
I can do that for you
-Patrick
Am 31.07.2018 um 21:08 schrieb Alex Foster:
> Sure, I don't mind. I would have done that myself but I don't think I have
> access to upload to cr.openjdk.java.net.
>
>
> Alex
>
>
> From: Stuart Marks
> Sent: July 31,
Am 31.07.2018 um 21:10 schrieb Patrick Reinhart:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I can do that for you
>
> -Patrick
>
Here it is:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~reinhapa/reviews/8143850/webrev
-Patrick
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk11.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205537
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8205537/webrev.00/
sun.applet is an internal package contained some code related to
implementation of applets and appletviewer. Some of its classes were
dropped
On 31/07/2018 16:39, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk11.
typo, I meant jdk12.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205537
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8205537/webrev.00/
sun.applet is an internal package contained some code related to
impleme
Hi Andrew,
I think most people are concentrating on JVMLS/OJW currently. That could
explain a lack of comments.
But from the discussion on this thread I see that your proposal is well
received.
On 7/31/18 4:01 AM, Andrew Dinn wrote:
Well, given the lack of any further input I am left wonderin
Hi Brian , I'll build it on AIX + in case it builds fine put it into our
test patch queue .
Best regards , Matthias
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:47:57 -0700
> From: Brian Burkhalter
> To: "B. Blase
17 matches
Mail list logo
