Hi Vladimir,
Hello,
I tried with the latest JDK, build 98 and see different behaviour
on two computers: 7570 / 8318 and 8560 / 8590, but sorting method
works slower with a[less++] instruction on both computers:
Is the first computer (with larger performance diff) an AMD by any
chance? It's
Hello,
Please, review the Sorting test class. I added tests
for null arrays (NPE must be thrown) and added description
of test to error message.
Thanks,
Vladimir
/*
* Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
both computers with Intel processor:
Pentium, Intel, 4 CPU, 3.2 GHz, 2 Gb RAM
Pentium, Intel, 4 CPU, 2.8 GHz, 2 Gb RAM
Osvaldo Pinali Doederlein wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
Hello,
I tried with the latest JDK, build 98 and see different behaviour
on two computers: 7570 / 8318 and 8560 / 8590, but
Alan,
Can you help review?
(1)TestUTF8
This one is no longer reproducible, it passes on all platforms
during the last several jprt runs.
(2)FindDecoderBugs
The only possible cause of its failure on a particular platform is
timeout, this test takes long cpu time
on slow machine. I
Xueming Shen wrote:
Alan,
Can you help review?
(1)TestUTF8
This one is no longer reproducible, it passes on all platforms
during the last several jprt runs.
(2)FindDecoderBugs
The only possible cause of its failure on a particular platform is
timeout, this test takes long cpu time
Changeset: dd98b0b747ec
Author:ohair
Date: 2010-06-22 10:54 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/dd98b0b747ec
6931871: Rebranding of javadoc generation in makefiles
6951293: control docs target does not work on windows
Reviewed-by: jjg
+
Changeset: d7fdaee81c14
Author:sherman
Date: 2010-06-22 14:04 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/d7fdaee81c14
6963156: TEST_BUG: Several tests under sun/nio/cs failed
Summary: Updated the test cases and removed them from ProblemList.txt
Reviewed-by: alanb
!
Alan Bateman wrote
Do you have cycles to take a pass over the sun/nio/cs tests to see if
they could run in samevm mode? I think they are in batch jdk_nio3 at
the moment and that test target currently runs in othervm mode.
