Changeset: 25dd23fa2511
Author:sundar
Date: 2010-09-03 11:25 +0530
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/25dd23fa2511
6458823: Messager messages on TypeParamterElements to not include position
information.
Reviewed-by: jjg
!
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 17:50, Joe Darcy joe.da...@oracle.com wrote:
Martin Buchholz wrote:
The usage T[] suggests that T is a reference type, as with generics, which
is not the case here.
More precisely, both the runtime types and compiletime types of the object
returned from clone of any
Am 03.09.2010 08:22, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 17:50, Joe Darcy joe.da...@oracle.com
mailto:joe.da...@oracle.com wrote:
Martin Buchholz wrote:
The usage T[] suggests that T is a reference type, as with generics,
which is not the case
here.
Am 03.09.2010 12:31, schrieb Ulf Zibis:
I think the question of variable types belongs to the spec, but here in Object class's javadoc we
should speak about objects. So I now suggest:
...and that the returned object of the {...@code clone} method of an array object of class {...@code
T[]} is
Changeset: b790c1ecee19
Author:ksrini
Date: 2010-09-03 07:59 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/b790c1ecee19
6981001: (launcher) EnsureJREInstallation is not being called in order
Reviewed-by: darcy
! src/windows/bin/java_md.c
+
Changeset: 43096cccf1ce
Author:cl
Date: 2010-08-13 11:38 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/rev/43096cccf1ce
Added tag jdk7-b105 for changeset 9f96a4269d77
! .hgtags
Changeset: 7d396ad455c3
Author:cl
Date: 2010-08-19 15:12 -0700
URL:
Changeset: 232adb83eae8
Author:cl
Date: 2010-08-19 15:12 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/corba/rev/232adb83eae8
Added tag jdk7-b106 for changeset 519daea4
! .hgtags
Changeset: 8d810527b499
Author:cl
Date: 2010-08-26 16:16 -0700
URL:
Changeset: bc45ccc5bcca
Author:cl
Date: 2010-08-13 11:38 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jaxws/rev/bc45ccc5bcca
Added tag jdk7-b105 for changeset 39eb4f3031f4
! .hgtags
Changeset: 017612ea6af4
Author:cl
Date: 2010-08-19 15:13 -0700
URL:
Changeset: 9ad95be9deae
Author:cl
Date: 2010-08-13 11:38 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/9ad95be9deae
Added tag jdk7-b105 for changeset 3b0abcb51280
! .hgtags
Changeset: f8bbf376595c
Author:yhuang
Date: 2010-08-11 02:22 -0700
URL:
Changeset: 112fcc00659d
Author:cl
Date: 2010-08-13 11:38 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/112fcc00659d
Added tag jdk7-b105 for changeset aaecac256d39
! .hgtags
Changeset: 2c1c657f69a4
Author:cl
Date: 2010-08-19 15:13 -0700
URL:
Changeset: 174916d435c9
Author:alanb
Date: 2010-09-03 13:11 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/174916d435c9
6965072: Need API to create SDP sockets
Reviewed-by: michaelm
! make/com/Makefile
+ make/com/oracle/Makefile
+ make/com/oracle/net/Makefile
!
Changeset: a6c142240837
Author:darcy
Date: 2010-09-03 15:00 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/a6c142240837
4881419: The type of X[].clone() should be X[]
Reviewed-by: martin
! src/share/classes/java/lang/Object.java
Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 03.09.2010 12:31, schrieb Ulf Zibis:
I think the question of variable types belongs to the spec, but here
in Object class's javadoc we should speak about objects. So I now
suggest:
...and that the returned object of the {...@code clone} method of an
array object of class
Ulf,
The spec needs to talk about *both* class (runtime) and type (compile-time).
And now it does.
Martin
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 15:31, Ulf Zibis ulf.zi...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 04.09.2010 00:05, schrieb Joe Darcy:
Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 03.09.2010 12:31, schrieb Ulf Zibis:
I think the
188 * The method {...@code clone} for*class* {...@code Object} performs a
189 * specific cloning operation. First, if the*class* of
this*object*does
190 * not implement the interface {...@code Cloneable}, then a
191 * {...@code CloneNotSupportedException} is thrown.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 16:13, Ulf Zibis ulf.zi...@gmx.de wrote:
,
the whole enclosing paragraph talks about class, object and instance, so
why talk about type for the array case?
Because the array types don't have their own javadoc, there is no other
obvious place to document the
I think I still don't understand. :-(
The compile-time behaviour is well documented in JLSv3 6.4.5.
But where is the run-time behaviour documented?
Isn't the javadoc of class Object a good place?
With the term 'spec' you mean the JLS or the javadoc of class Object?
-Ulf
Am 04.09.2010
17 matches
Mail list logo