On 09/01/2012 07:11 PM, Ulf wrote:
Am 01.09.2012 03:15, schrieb Stuart Marks:
On 8/31/12 3:19 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Stuart, much thanks for your detailed explanation. The as is
situation has not
been in question from my side, but anyway it seems, that it had
catalysed a new
solution, despite t
On 1/09/2012 5:42 AM, Mike Duigou wrote:
The changes look good to me.
I am starting to come into agreement with Remi though that unless a type
specific array can be created for situations like the E[] elements array in
ArrayDeque then it should be declared as Object[] array since that's what i
