I didn't know that Randall was following this mailing list and this thread.
http://xkcd.com/1172/
Bruce
On 9/02/2013 9:32 a.m., Joe Darcy wrote:
Hello,
On 2/6/2013 11:32 PM, Bruce Chapman wrote:
Stephen, In your case(s) would the workaround fail to work if the bug
was fixed?
Working
Changeset: 973646bf043a
Author:jfranck
Date: 2013-02-12 11:28 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/973646bf043a
8004822: RFE to write language model API tests for repeating annotations based
on the spec updates
Reviewed-by: jjg, abuckley
Contributed-by:
Changeset: f7fb173ac833
Author:dsamersoff
Date: 2013-02-12 16:02 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/f7fb173ac833
8007786: JDK-8002048 testcase doesn't work on Solaris
Summary: test built in into Solaris shell doesn't have -e operator
Reviewed-by: sla, sspitsyn
!
Am 12.02.2013 01:45, schrieb Vitaly Davidovich:
javac will not replace concat ops across loop iterations, it will replace whichever ones are
inside one loop iteration. This will still create temporary StringBuilder instances.
As for JIT optimizing further, it would have to fully unroll the
Changeset: 073696f59241
Author:vromero
Date: 2013-02-12 13:36 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/073696f59241
8006334: javap, JavapTask constructor breaks with null pointer exception if
parameter options is null
Reviewed-by: jjg
!
:-)
On Feb 12, 2013, at 12:19 AM, Bruce Chapman wrote:
I didn't know that Randall was following this mailing list and this thread.
http://xkcd.com/1172/
Changeset: 7dcb74c3ffba
Author:sherman
Date: 2013-02-12 09:25 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/7dcb74c3ffba
8007392: JSR 310: DateTime API Updates
8007520: Update date/time classes in j.util and j.sql packages
8007572: Replace existing jdk timezone data at
Jrockit mission control supports an exception count based on exception
type.
I have found the approach of just counting the total number of exception
completely useless.
Mainly because there are methods that throw exceptions as part of the
normal flow. For example, Class.forName() is commonly
Changeset: fdb1e09519ed
Author:sherman
Date: 2013-02-12 09:27 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/rev/fdb1e09519ed
8007392: JSR 310: DateTime API Updates
Summary: Integration of JSR310 Date/Time API for M7
Reviewed-by: darcy, alanb, naoto
Contributed-by:
Dmitry,
This test is now failing on several platforms, on jdk8 and 7u-dev
---
result: Passed. Compilation successful
#section:shell
--messages:(3/154)--
command: shell JdpTest.sh [--jtreg, --no-compile]
reason: User specified action: run shell JdpTest.sh --jtreg
Changeset: 2154ed9ff6c8
Author:mcimadamore
Date: 2013-02-12 19:25 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/2154ed9ff6c8
8007464: Add graph inference support
Summary: Add support for more aggressive type-inference scheme
Reviewed-by: jjg
!
Kelly,
Good catch but this part of test is not executed under JTReg, and this
mistake cause extra mkdir call but not a test error.
-Dmitry
On 2013-02-12 21:52, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
+if [ ! -f ${_testclasses} ]
needs to be
+if [ ! -d ${_testclasses} ]
-kto
On Feb 12, 2013, at
Kelly,
Do you have an idea why I didn't see this failure under jprt?
http://sthjprt.se.oracle.com/archives/2013/02/2013-02-08-192233.dsamerso.tl/
-Dmitry
On 2013-02-12 21:52, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
+if [ ! -f ${_testclasses} ]
needs to be
+if [ ! -d ${_testclasses} ]
-kto
On
Chris,
I'm not able to reproduce it locally. Do you have a link to jprt job you
see this failure?
-Dmitry
On 2013-02-12 21:38, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Dmitry,
This test is now failing on several platforms, on jdk8 and 7u-dev
---
result: Passed. Compilation successful
Dmitry,
you have to use -testset core to run this test via JPRT. It's not run
on regular jobs.
Alejandro
On 2/12/2013 3:18 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Kelly,
Do you have an idea why I didn't see this failure under jprt?
Hi Steven;
I have updated the patch for Java 8. There's somewhat less code sharing and a
bit of refactoring than your last version but the performance should be about
the same or a little better.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8007398/0/webrev/
I am currently running the jtreg
Changeset: bc456436c613
Author:jjg
Date: 2013-02-12 17:15 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/bc456436c613
8008077: update reference impl for type-annotations
Reviewed-by: jjg
Contributed-by: wmdi...@cs.washington.edu
!
Thank you for the comments Ulf.
On Feb 12 2013, at 17:24 , Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 13.02.2013 00:30, schrieb Mike Duigou:
Hi Steven;
I have updated the patch for Java 8. There's somewhat less code sharing and
a bit of refactoring than your last version but the performance should be
about
Am 13.02.2013 00:30, schrieb Mike Duigou:
Hi Steven;
I have updated the patch for Java 8. There's somewhat less code sharing and a
bit of refactoring than your last version but the performance should be about
the same or a little better.
Am 13.02.2013 02:34, schrieb Mike Duigou:
Thank you for the comments Ulf.
On Feb 12 2013, at 17:24 , Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 13.02.2013 00:30, schrieb Mike Duigou:
Hi Steven;
I have updated the patch for Java 8. There's somewhat less code sharing and a
bit of refactoring than your last version
20 matches
Mail list logo
