Thanks for the quick fix!
Alejandro
On 5/9/2014 1:28 PM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
Pushed. You may now resume normal integration activities.
On 05/09/14 15:12, Staffan Larsen wrote:
Looks good.
Many apologies.
/Staffan
On 9 maj 2014, at 21:08, Eric McCorkle wrote:
The following patch will
Pushed. You may now resume normal integration activities.
On 05/09/14 15:12, Staffan Larsen wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> Many apologies.
>
> /Staffan
>
>
> On 9 maj 2014, at 21:08, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>
>> The following patch will fix it:
>>
>> diff -r 7426549b1e3b
>> src/solaris/native/sun/to
Looks good.
Many apologies.
/Staffan
On 9 maj 2014, at 21:08, Eric McCorkle wrote:
> The following patch will fix it:
>
> diff -r 7426549b1e3b
> src/solaris/native/sun/tools/attach/SolarisVirtualMachine.c
> --- a/src/solaris/native/sun/tools/attach/SolarisVirtualMachine.c
> +++ b/src/solaris
Approved.
-Chris.
On 9 May 2014, at 20:08, Eric McCorkle wrote:
> The following patch will fix it:
>
> diff -r 7426549b1e3b
> src/solaris/native/sun/tools/attach/SolarisVirtualMachine.c
> --- a/src/solaris/native/sun/tools/attach/SolarisVirtualMachine.c
> +++ b/src/solaris/native/sun/tools/att
The following patch will fix it:
diff -r 7426549b1e3b
src/solaris/native/sun/tools/attach/SolarisVirtualMachine.c
--- a/src/solaris/native/sun/tools/attach/SolarisVirtualMachine.c
+++ b/src/solaris/native/sun/tools/attach/SolarisVirtualMachine.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-''/*
+/*
* Copyright (c) 2005, 20
The problem is a stray '' as the first two characters in the file.
I have posted a patch that removes it to serviceability-dev.
All we need is someone with Reviewer/committer rights to step in and
apply it.
On 05/09/14 14:48, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
>
> Definitively a P1.
> This is also bloc
Definitively a P1.
This is also blocking this week hotspot snapshot:
http://prt-web.us.oracle.com//archive/2014/05/2014-05-09-174238.amurillo.jdk9-hs-2014-05-09-jdk9-dev-control/logs/solaris_sparcv9_5.10-fastdebug.log.FAILED.log
please fix ASAP
Thanks
Alejandro
On 5/9/2014 12:16 PM, Eric McCor
Bug created: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042859
This patch seems to be the culprit:
changeset: 9908:7426549b1e3b
tag: tip
user:sla
date:Fri May 09 12:06:13 2014 +0200
summary: 8039173: Propagate errors from Diagnostic Commands as
exceptions in the attac
I am currently seeing build failures on solaris, coming from within the
JDK repo:
/opt/jprt/products/P1/SS12u1/SS12u1/prod/bin/cc -DTRACING
-DMACRO_MEMSYS_OPS -DBREAKPTS -D_BIG_ENDIAN= -DSOLARIS
-DARCH='"sparcv9"' -Dsparcv9 -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED
-DRELEASE='"1.9.0-internal"'
-I/tmp/jprt/P1/173806.emcc
On 07/05/2014 08:42, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Martin,
I have restructured the processReaperExecutor construction. It now
incorporates system thread group search and thread pool construction
in one doPrivileged call. I also extracted the creation of
ThreadFactory into a local variable so it's mo
Staffan, Alan, thanks for reviews! I will wait with pushing it until
Monday to make sure no one has objections.
// Katja
On 05/09/2014 01:07 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 09/05/2014 11:43, Yekaterina Kantserova wrote:
Hi,
The version b09 of JTreg which contains
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/
On 09/05/2014 11:43, Yekaterina Kantserova wrote:
Hi,
The version b09 of JTreg which contains
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/CODETOOLS-7900178 has been
promoted. So it seems to be time to push the fix for JDK-8034960. I've
made a new webrev to be sure the changes fit in in the latest jd
Looks good!
Thanks,
/Staffan
On 9 maj 2014, at 12:43, Yekaterina Kantserova
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The version b09 of JTreg which contains
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/CODETOOLS-7900178 has been promoted. So
> it seems to be time to push the fix for JDK-8034960. I've made a new webrev
Hi,
The version b09 of JTreg which contains
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/CODETOOLS-7900178 has been
promoted. So it seems to be time to push the fix for JDK-8034960. I've
made a new webrev to be sure the changes fit in in the latest jdk9
source. The webrev can be found here:
cr.openj
On 05/06/2014 06:38 PM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
Paul / Florian,
This is a combined response. I am making the corrections pointed out by
Florian. Unless I hear otherwise, I am going to assume that Paul’s
approval is still valid with these corrections included and will push
the path on Wednesday.
On 09/05/2014 08:28, fuyou wrote:
I use the NetBeans profiler ,the result in attach.
Which JDK build is this? I don't think we've had any reports of Selector
spinning issues in some time.
-Alan.
I use the NetBeans profiler ,the result in attach.
2014-05-09 11:14 GMT+08:00 fuyou :
> My program is build on Netty4 .
> In benchmark,i find the epollWait consume many cpu,the jstack is
>
>
> The stack of busy(10.4%) thread(30873/0x7899) of java process(30757) of
> user(fuyou):
> "NETTYSERVER-
17 matches
Mail list logo
