Looks good to me.
Masayoshi
On 4/29/2015 11:37 PM, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
Hi,
Please, review the fix for adding the latest tzdata2015d to JDK9.
The JTREG and JPRT tests were executed.
No failures were observed.
Thank you,
Aleksej
[1] JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077685
[2]
On 04/29/2015 05:35 PM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Peter,
There should be two changesets; so pretend the truncation has been
performed for this change.
It maybe useful to backport the performance improvement to jdk 8 but
the spec change
will have to be in 9 (or wait for a maintenance release).
On 04/28/2015 05:46 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
On 04/28/2015 04:57 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Here's my attempt at simplifying this:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/misc/LogManager.synchronization/webrev.01/
LogManager can be subclassed, and subclasses may override reset() for
different
The approach works for me, and the patch is valid as is.
Stephen
On 30 April 2015 at 11:24, Peter Levart peter.lev...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/29/2015 05:35 PM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Peter,
There should be two changesets; so pretend the truncation has been
performed for this change.
It
Hi Peter,
Sorry I didn't reply to your last mail.
I still intend to.
more on the current mail below...
On 30/04/15 13:08, Peter Levart wrote:
On 04/28/2015 05:46 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
On 04/28/2015 04:57 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Here's my attempt at simplifying this:
P.S. Sorry, not sure if changes like d62023 - {@literal d62023}
(see, e.g., ValueBoxGen24.java) are what expected; please correct me if
I'm wrong.
But something should be done; otherwise d62023 is interpreted as an
unknown HTML tag causing the errors.
Thanks,
Alexander
On 30.04.2015 14:31,
Hi Peter,
Yes, go ahead with the patch as is.
Thanks, Roger
On 4/30/2015 6:24 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
On 04/29/2015 05:35 PM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Peter,
There should be two changesets; so pretend the truncation has been
performed for this change.
It maybe useful to backport the
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for working through all these changes.
0) Is there an upstream version of any of this code? Making even
cosmetic changes
would make future versions harder to merge.
1) For files that we don't typically generate javadoc for, it is simpler
to avoid adding unnecessary
On 28/04/15 17:46, Peter Levart wrote:
On 04/28/2015 04:57 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Here's my attempt at simplifying this:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/misc/LogManager.synchronization/webrev.01/
LogManager can be subclassed, and subclasses may override reset() for
different
On 30/04/2015 14:47, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for working through all these changes.
0) Is there an upstream version of any of this code? Making even
cosmetic changes
would make future versions harder to merge.
No. This was the case a long time ago but for many releases
Hello,
Could you please review the fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8040147/webrev.01/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040147
Just a very minor fix of docs markup.
Thanks,
Alexander
Hello Roger,
Thank you for the notes; please see the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8079075/webrev.01/
Regards,
Alexander
On 30.04.2015 16:47, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for working through all these changes.
0) Is there an upstream version of any of this
Hi Alexander,
The improvements look good to me.
Thank you, Roger
On 4/30/2015 12:35 PM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Roger,
Thank you for the notes; please see the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8079075/webrev.01/
Regards,
Alexander
On 30.04.2015 16:47, Roger
Thanks!
- Исходное сообщение -
От: roger.ri...@oracle.com
Кому: alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com
Копия: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Отправленные: Четверг, 30 Апрель 2015 г 21:41:05 GMT +03:00 Москва,
Санкт-Петербург, Волгоград
Тема: Re: RFR [9] 8079075: some docs cleanup for CORBA -
On 04/30/2015 07:42 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8077846/webrev.00/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/misc/LogManager.synchronization/webrev.02/
I reviewed both of the above webrevs.
TestConfigurationLock.java
Copyright year should be 2015
On 04/30/2015 04:42 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 28/04/15 17:46, Peter Levart wrote:
On 04/28/2015 04:57 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Here's my attempt at simplifying this:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/misc/LogManager.synchronization/webrev.01/
LogManager can be subclassed, and
16 matches
Mail list logo