Thanks for the review, Joe!
On 5/13/20 2:58 PM, Joe Wang wrote:
+1
They are from the reference files, but it's interesting to note the
ranges in Blocks.txt (that Character.java follows) for Tangut Supplement
(18D00..18D8F) and CJK Unified Ideographs Extension G (3..3134F) are
slightly di
On 5/13/2020 3:24 PM, naoto.s...@oracle.com wrote:
Thanks for the review, Joe!
On 5/13/20 2:58 PM, Joe Wang wrote:
+1
They are from the reference files, but it's interesting to note the
ranges in Blocks.txt (that Character.java follows) for Tangut
Supplement (18D00..18D8F) and CJK Unified
Hi, Jim
I have a few comments on the new wording (hopefully my understanding is
correct):
! * If the block ends with a LF{@code "\n"} or CR{@code "\r"}
character,
! * then this implies the block closes in column 0 of the next line,
and thus
! * implies an indent of 0.
I feel like th
+1
They are from the reference files, but it's interesting to note the
ranges in Blocks.txt (that Character.java follows) for Tangut Supplement
(18D00..18D8F) and CJK Unified Ideographs Extension G (3..3134F) are
slightly different from those in the online pdf files
(http://www.unicode.or
Hi Andy,
Looks good.
Thanks,
Alexander
On 5/13/20 7:11 AM, Andy Herrick wrote:
Please review jpackage fix for issue [1] at [2].
[1] - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8244576
[2] - http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8244576/webrev.01/
/Andy
f its permitted subclasses.
* asm support for the PermittedSubclasses attribute
Open Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/8225056/webrev.00/index.html
JBS bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225056
Java Language Spec changes:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/jep360/
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for looking at this.
On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 17:37 +0100, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> On 13/05/2020 15:59, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could somebody please review this fix for the failing
> > JapanEraNameCompatTest.java test (part of tier1)? The reason why it's
> > failing
On 2020-05-13 20:31, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 13/05/2020 16:44, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
compilers can't see though and optimize away the repeated GetObjectField
calls in places such as in the io_util_md.h GET_FD macro:
#define GET_FD(this, fid) \
(*env)->GetObjectField(env, (this), (fid
On 13/05/2020 16:44, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
compilers can't see though and optimize away the repeated GetObjectField
calls in places such as in the io_util_md.h GET_FD macro:
#define GET_FD(this, fid) \
(*env)->GetObjectField(env, (this), (fid)) == NULL ? \
-1 : (*env)->GetIntFie
Hi Roger,
On 2020-05-13 19:55, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Claes,
Looks fine.
thank you for reviewing!
/Claes
Straightfoward since the offiset is already cached for other operations.
Thanks, Roger
Thanks!
I filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8244960
Looks like a good change.
(But we are more time-limited than usual these days)
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:35 AM Christoph Dreis
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> forgive me if this is not the correct list. I get confused where things about
> jav
Hi Claes,
Looks fine.
Straightfoward since the offiset is already cached for other operations.
Thanks, Roger
On 5/13/20 11:44 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
compilers can't see though and optimize away the repeated GetObjectField
calls in places such as in the io_util_md.h GET_FD macro:
#def
Hi Naoto,
Looks fine.
Lots of small changes but mostly in the Unicode reference files.
Thanks, Roger
On 5/7/20 5:59 PM, naoto.s...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello,
Please review the fix to the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239383
Its CSR and proposed changeset are loca
Hi,
forgive me if this is not the correct list. I get confused where things about
java.util.concurrent should be posted.
I found an optimization opportunity in ConcurrentHashMap that seems relatively
straight-forward.
When ConcurrentHashMap.get() is called on an empty map, the key's hashCode()
On 13/05/2020 15:59, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could somebody please review this fix for the failing
> JapanEraNameCompatTest.java test (part of tier1)? The reason why it's
> failing is that there are missing locale data for no and sr_Latn which
> are exercised by the test. The original bac
Ping.
Naoto
On 5/7/20 2:59 PM, naoto.s...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello,
Please review the fix to the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239383
Its CSR and proposed changeset are located at:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239504
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naot
Hi,
compilers can't see though and optimize away the repeated GetObjectField
calls in places such as in the io_util_md.h GET_FD macro:
#define GET_FD(this, fid) \
(*env)->GetObjectField(env, (this), (fid)) == NULL ? \
-1 : (*env)->GetIntField(env, (*env)->GetObjectField(env,
(this),
On 12/05/2020 15:14, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for looking at this.
>
> On Tue, 2020-05-12 at 14:07 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 5/7/20 4:09 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>> jvm_version_info.jvm_version currently holds this quadruplet:
>>>
>>> Most significant 8 bits => maj
Hi,
Could somebody please review this fix for the failing
JapanEraNameCompatTest.java test (part of tier1)? The reason why it's
failing is that there are missing locale data for no and sr_Latn which
are exercised by the test. The original backport of JDK-8219781 didn't
include those as the changed
Looks good.
- Alexey
On 5/13/2020 10:11 AM, Andy Herrick wrote:
Please review jpackage fix for issue [1] at [2].
[1] - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8244576
[2] - http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8244576/webrev.01/
/Andy
Please review jpackage fix for issue [1] at [2].
[1] - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8244576
[2] - http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8244576/webrev.01/
/Andy
> On 13 May 2020, at 13:12, Maurizio Cimadamore
> wrote:
>
> Another iteration which addresses the latest CSR comments (the CSR has now
> been approved):
>
> * make MemorySegment::withAccessModes/hasAccessMode throw
> IllegalArgumentException in cases where the provided mask is invalid (thi
Another iteration which addresses the latest CSR comments (the CSR has
now been approved):
* make MemorySegment::withAccessModes/hasAccessMode throw
IllegalArgumentException in cases where the provided mask is invalid
(this required a test tweak)
* sprinkled a couple of references to the JLS i
23 matches
Mail list logo