If this instance is an Optional , passing an
Optional will fail to compile.
Regards,
Michael
On 31 Oct 2015 11:21, "Stefan Zobel" wrote:
> 2015-10-31 19:11 GMT+01:00 Remi Forax :
>
> > Hi all, hi Paul,
> >
> > I've just seen that Optional.or is declared as
> > public Optional or(Supplier> sup
Hi Vitaly,
Exactly, I was just trying to point out the method signature seems broken
anyway.
Regards,
Michael
On 31 Oct 2015 11:59, "Vitaly Davidovich" wrote:
> This would require Supplier>, not Supplier Optional>.
>
> sent from my phone
> On Oct 31, 2015 2:49 PM,
Doesn't work, as Stuart has noted (s'marks, as far as I know your
explanation is 100% correct). Nested generics == pain :-(
Regards,
Michael
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Stefan Zobel wrote:
> 2016-10-07 21:22 GMT+02:00 Stuart Marks :
> >
> >
> > On 10/7/16 11:23 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> >>>
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Brian Goetz wrote:
> 8 can deal with multi-release JARs.
>
I missed that. Starting with what update? Is there any link I could use to
share this info?
Regards,
Michael
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> At one point we were mulling back porting the Java 9 runtime changes to
> Java 8 and therefore we could go back to Java 7, but we decided not to
> proceed with that, which is what i suspect you may be thinking about.
>
>
Yes, I was hopeful abou
Some of these are actually supported by NetBeans, such as:
LeakingThisInConstructor
Regards,
Michael
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
> On 11/15/12 3:06 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>
>> On 14/11/2012 22:44, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>>
>>> - @SuppressWarnings("unused") Eclipse??
