Some of these are actually supported by NetBeans, such as:
LeakingThisInConstructor
Regards,
Michael
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Stuart Marks <stuart.ma...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 11/15/12 3:06 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>
>> On 14/11/2012 22:44, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>>
>>> - @SuppressWarnings("unused") Eclipse???
>>> Do we have precedent for adding these suppressions??
>>>
>> I don't see it in the -Xlint options that javac supports so it might be
>> specific to ECJ. I recall this topic came up during one of the warnings
>> clean-up days, Stuart might remember the outcome.
>
>
> Yes, I gave an (Oracle internal) tech talk on warnings cleanup some time
> back where I mentioned this issue. I'll repeat the results here for
> everybody's benefit.
>
> The background is that the words that can be supplied to @SuppressWarnings
> reside in an uncontrolled namespace. The JLS [1] defines only "unchecked"
> and any others are compiler-specific. The set of words accepted here by
> javac is the same as the words defined for -Xlint.
>
> I did a survey of the sources in the jdk repo and found that the
> javac-defined warnings suppression tags were:
>
> deprecation fallthrough rawtypes serial try unchecked
>
> In addition, I found the following non-javac tags used:
>
> all
> empty-statement
> unused
> LeakingThisInConstructor
> OverridableMethodCallInConstructor
> ResultOfObjectAllocationIgnored
> SleepWhileHoldingLock
> UnnecessaryLocalVariable
>
> I actually have no idea which tool processes these. The names are suggestive
> though. I don't think we ever determined any policy about which names ought
> to be used in the OpenJDK code base. At the very least I think any of the
> javac -Xlint words is acceptable. I could be convinced that allowing others
> is a good idea (such as the Eclipse ones) if they're useful and a definition
> is available somewhere.
>
> s'marks
>
>
> [1] http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-9.html#jls-9.6.3.5
