Hi,
Would it be possible to have my fix for JDK-8228971 reviewed?
The is a trivial doc-only fix which removes redundant hyphens for
parameter descriptions for the Locale API doc. The intent is to push
this to JDK 13.
Further information on this bug can be found here:
Hi,
Would it be possible to have my fix for JDK-8229338 reviewed?
This a general refactoring of test/jdk/java/util/RandomAccess/Basic.java
as outlined in JDK-8229338 'clean up
test/jdk/java/util/RandomAccess/Basic.java'.
Further information on this bug can be found here:
, Patrick Concannon
mailto:patrick.concan...@oracle.com>>
wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to have my fix for JDK-8229338 reviewed?
This a general refactoring of
test/jdk/java/util/RandomAccess/Basic.java as outlined in JDK-8229338
'clean up test/jdk/java/util/RandomAccess/Basic.java'.
F
Hi Vipin,
Always happy to help someone who wants to contribute!
I'll create the bug ID for you, and sponsor your fix.
Kind regards,
Patrick
On 02/03/2020 19:33, Vipin Sharma wrote:
Hi,
My OCA has been processed recently and I want to start Contributing to
OpenJDK.
As a first fix, I would
Hi,
Please find the next iteration of mapMulti in the new webrev below.
In this iteration the following changes have been made:
The API note for mapMulti has been updated.
Sub-interfaces for {Int, Double, Long}Stream have been refactored to be more
specific to mapMulti.
The examples have been
> ofPusher(sink -> mapper.accept(sink, e)));
> }
>
> And now, I don't think it's necessary to specialize it at all.
> Probably it's not necessary to introduce mapMulti at all as well, as
> now it's a trivial delegate to ofPusher.
>
> With best regards,
> Tagir Valeev.
&g
Hi,
John: Thanks for your feedback. We've rearranged the ordering of the parameters
of the BiConsumer to follow the convention you suggested, and hopefully improve
readability going forward. Additional FIs (IntObjConsumer, etc.) have been
added as sub-interfaces to the corresponding Stream
simple
>>> spatial preposition would work well: mapThrough, mapAcross, etc.
>>> I think I prefer mapAcross because the term “across” can be read
>>> adverbially: “we are mapping T across to Consumer”.
>>>
>>> So:
>>>
>>&g
wrong
> one, to java.util.stream and not java.util.function).
>
> About the examples, i will try to think about that this evening :)
>
> regards,
> Rémi
>
> - Mail original -
>> De: "Patrick Concannon"
>> À: "Julia Boes"
>> Cc
exerciseOps(data, s -> s.mapMulti((e, sink) -> IntStream.range(0,
>> e).forEach(sink::accept)));
>>
>>
>> ...where you could simply pass just sink:
>>
>>
>> exerciseOps(data, s -> s.mapMulti((e, sink) -> IntStream.range(0
bring this baggage with it
and therefore seems more fitting.
Kind regards,
Patrick
> On 4 Jul 2020, at 17:23, Anthony Vanelverdinghe wrote:
>
> On 02/07/2020 16:38, Patrick Concannon wrote:
>> Hi Anthony,
> Hi Patrick
>> Thanks for your suggestion of using a Stream.Build
Hi,
Could someone please review myself and Julia's RFE and CSR for JDK-8238286 -
'Add new flatMap stream operation that is more amenable to pushing’?
This proposal is to add a new flatMap-like operation:
` Stream mapMulti(BiConsumer, ? super T> mapper)`
to the java.util.Stream class. This
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 22:03:54 GMT, Stephen Colebourne
wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contai
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.time`
> packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. T
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:25:55 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contai
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 22:11:59 GMT, Stephen Colebourne
wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contai
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:31:10 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contai
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
> packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. T
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:10:19 GMT, Rémi Forax wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contai
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
> packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with two
additional commits since the last
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 17:04:58 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8268124: small refactoring; fixed misplaced comment and added missing
>> lambda op
Hi,
Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.time`
packages to make use of the switch expressions?
Kind regards,
Patrick
-
Commit messages:
- 8268469: Update java.time to use switch expressions
Changes:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
> packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. T
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.time`
> packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. T
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:25:16 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
> packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
This pull request has now been integrated.
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
> package to make use of switch expressions?
>
> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Patrick
Patrick Concanno
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:27:58 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8269124: Added missing brace; fixed build issue
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/j
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:51:27 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contai
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.time`
> packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. T
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:58:22 GMT, Stephen Colebourne
wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull req
Hi,
Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
package to make use of switch expressions?
This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
Kind regards,
Patrick
-
Commit messages:
- 8269124: Update java.time to use
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
> package to make use of switch expressions?
>
> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Patrick
Patrick Concanno
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 15:40:12 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8269124: Added missing brace; fixed build issue
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/j
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
> package to make use of switch expressions?
>
> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Patrick
Patrick Concanno
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 17:54:30 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> I'd personally replace all the applicable locations, as otherwise, it would
>> confuse why there are two idioms. But it is outside of this PR so probably
>> for another day.
>
> I agree with Naoto that it's a bit strange.
OK. If you
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
> package to make use of switch expressions?
>
> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Patrick
Patrick Concanno
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 15:41:59 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.time`
> packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
This pull request has now been integrated.
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.time`
> packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. T
Hi,
Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.util`
package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
Kind regards,
Patrick
-
Commit messages:
- 8267110: Update java.util to use instanceof pattern variable
Changes:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.util`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a re
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.util`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit si
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.util`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a re
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
> `java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
> `java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
ad
On Wed, 26 May 2021 09:05:34 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
>> `java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
> `java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
ad
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
> `java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
On Tue, 25 May 2021 15:18:46 GMT, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contain
Hi,
Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
`java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the switch expressions?
Kind regards,
Patrick
-
Commit messages:
- 8267670: Update java.io, java.math, and java.text to use switch expressions
On Tue, 18 May 2021 10:37:21 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.util`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
This pull request has now been i
On Tue, 25 May 2021 06:01:49 GMT, Tagir F. Valeev wrote:
>> Inspired by PR#4088. Most of the changes are done automatically using
>> IntelliJ IDEA refactoring. Some manual adjustments are also performed,
>> including indentations, moving comments, extracting common cast out of
>> switch
On Tue, 25 May 2021 12:43:00 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contain
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
> `java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
On Tue, 25 May 2021 13:16:00 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contain
On Tue, 25 May 2021 12:31:38 GMT, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contain
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
> `java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
> `java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
Hi,
Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
packages to make use of the switch expressions?
Kind regards,
Patrick
-
Commit messages:
- 8268124: Update java.lang to use switch expressions
Changes:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
> `java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
> packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. T
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:43:25 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8268124: small refactoring; fixed misplaced comment and added missing
>> lambda op
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
> packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:06:42 GMT, Rémi Forax wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8268124: small refactoring; fixed misplaced comment and added missing
>> lambda op
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 11:35:13 GMT, Rémi Forax wrote:
>> My mistake. I've replaced the colon now with the lambda operator. See a8706b0
>
>> My mistake. I've replaced the colon now with the lambda operator.
>
> Drive by comment, in term of name, `->` is the arrow operator not the lambda
>
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.util`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a re
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
> `java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
ad
On Tue, 25 May 2021 09:37:58 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
> `java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
This pull
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:50:17 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
> package to make use of switch expressions?
>
> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.time`
> packages to make use of the switch expressions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. T
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
> package to make use of switch expressions?
>
> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Patrick
Patrick Concanno
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:44:30 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:29:36 GMT, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contain
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.time`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a re
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:02:06 GMT, Andrey Turbanov
wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request cont
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:56:16 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.time`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
This pull request has now been i
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Patrick
Hi,
Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.time`
package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
Kind regards,
Patrick
-
Commit messages:
- Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into JDK-8263668
- 8263668: Update java.time to use
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:59:18 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
This pull request has now been i
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.time`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a re
gt; ??? && Arrays.equals(ptypes, that.ptypes);
>
> The use of "if it's not, return false" is a holdover from when we
> couldn't express this as a single expression (which is almost always
> preferable), which means we had to fall back to control flow.? Now we
> d
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit si
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:56:00 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8263358: Refactored equals methods
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/mod
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a re
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:38:30 GMT, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8263358: Refactored equals methods
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/P
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit si
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a re
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:46:09 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my changeset for JDK-8252399: 'Update mapMulti
> documentation to use type test pattern instead of instanceof once JEP 375
> exits preview' ?
>
> This change updates the e
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 18:48:30 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
> `java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the `instanceof` pattern
> variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
T
Hi,
Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
Kind regards,
Patrick
-
Commit messages:
- 8263358: Update java.lang to use instanceof pattern variable
Changes:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a re
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit si
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.lang`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a re
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:49:56 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> yes,
>> javac should emit a warning in that case, that also the answer of Brian.
>>
>> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/amber-spec-experts/2021-March/002925.html
>
> Then we should use an unbounded wildcard here and in similar
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 19:26:35 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> `declaringClass` is a string representing the class name (not the `Class`
>> object). The variable name indeed causes confusion.
>
> Doh. My mistake. Was thinking about `StackFrame`. Thanks Mandy!
I've reordered the checks as suggested
lti to use the type test pattern introduced in
> [JEP375](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/375).
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brou
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:26:02 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8252399: Converted JavadocExamples to test
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/ut
lti to use the type test pattern introduced in
> [JEP375](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/375).
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
8252399: Added note for keeping example in syn
Hi,
Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
`java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the `instanceof` pattern
variable?
Kind regards,
Patrick
-
Commit messages:
- 8263190: Update java.io, java.math, and java.text to use instanceof
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.time`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a re
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.time`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a re
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
