Hi Chris,
Looks fine to me; thanks,
-Joe
On 11/5/2015 11:12 AM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Joe,
Here's the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8141489/webrev.01
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8141489
These are all the repos that have been updated:
>$ grep requiredV
On 11/5/15 10:16 AM, joe darcy wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 11/5/2015 9:26 AM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Joe,
Is there a reason to upgrade them if the tests don't actually require
b12? BTW, there are more than just those two repos. The following all
have TEST.ROOT:
bash-4.1$ find . -name TEST.ROOT
./
Hi Chris,
On 11/5/2015 9:26 AM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Joe,
Is there a reason to upgrade them if the tests don't actually require
b12? BTW, there are more than just those two repos. The following all
have TEST.ROOT:
bash-4.1$ find . -name TEST.ROOT
./hotspot/agent/test/jdi/TEST.ROOT
./hots
Hi Joe,
Is there a reason to upgrade them if the tests don't actually require
b12? BTW, there are more than just those two repos. The following all
have TEST.ROOT:
bash-4.1$ find . -name TEST.ROOT
./hotspot/agent/test/jdi/TEST.ROOT
./hotspot/test/TEST.ROOT
./deploy/test/TEST.ROOT
./nashorn/te
Hi Chris,
The langtools and jaxp repos also have TEST.ROOT files with a
requiredVersion clause. I'd prefer if the files in those repos were
updated at the same to b12.
Thanks,
-Joe
On 11/4/2015 6:25 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Please review the following changes:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~
Hi Joe,
Here's the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8141489/webrev.01
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8141489
These are all the repos that have been updated:
>$ grep requiredVersion `find . -name TEST.ROOT`
./hotspot/test/TEST.ROOT:requiredVersion=4.1 b12
./deploy
Thanks David and Staffan!
Chris
On 11/4/15 11:25 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
Looks good!
Thanks,
/Staffan
On 5 nov. 2015, at 03:25, Chris Plummer wrote:
Please review the following changes:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8141489/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8141489
The
Looks good!
Thanks,
/Staffan
> On 5 nov. 2015, at 03:25, Chris Plummer wrote:
>
> Please review the following changes:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8141489/
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8141489
>
> The changes I did for 8140189 require that version 4.1 b12 of jtreg
Looks good to me Chris!
Thanks,
David
On 5/11/2015 12:25 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Please review the following changes:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8141489/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8141489
The changes I did for 8140189 require that version 4.1 b12 of jtreg be
used, s
Please review the following changes:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8141489/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8141489
The changes I did for 8140189 require that version 4.1 b12 of jtreg be
used, so TEST.ROOT has been updated to reflect this.
Testing with JPRT right now. I also
10 matches
Mail list logo