On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:30:11 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Kim Barrett has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional
>> commits
> Please review this change that eliminates the use of Reference.isEnqueued by
> tests. There were three tests using it:
>
> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/ReferencesGC/ReferencesGC.java
> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/WeakReferenceGC/WeakReferenceGC.java
> jdk/java/lang/ref/ReferenceEnqueue.java
>
> In each of
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:56:25 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> I understand that the test code previously just forwarded the
>> `InterruptedException` if it happened in the `Thread.sleep()` call too. So
>> this may only be an exiting issue and please ignore this comment.
>> Not catching
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:01:54 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> Please review this change that eliminates the use of Reference.isEnqueued by
>> tests. There were three tests using it:
>>
>> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/ReferencesGC/ReferencesGC.java
>>
> Please review this change that eliminates the use of Reference.isEnqueued by
> tests. There were three tests using it:
>
> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/ReferencesGC/ReferencesGC.java
> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/WeakReferenceGC/WeakReferenceGC.java
> jdk/java/lang/ref/ReferenceEnqueue.java
>
> In each of
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:59:09 GMT, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/lang/ref/ReferenceEnqueue.java line 58:
>>
>>> 56: for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
>>> 57: System.gc();
>>> 58: enqueued = (queue.remove(100) == ref);
>>
>> The code does
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:26:04 GMT, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>> Please review this change that eliminates the use of Reference.isEnqueued by
>> tests. There were three tests using it:
>>
>> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/ReferencesGC/ReferencesGC.java
>>
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:28:44 GMT, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>> Please review this change that eliminates the use of Reference.isEnqueued by
>> tests. There were three tests using it:
>>
>> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/ReferencesGC/ReferencesGC.java
>>
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:23:47 GMT, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>> Please review this change that eliminates the use of Reference.isEnqueued by
>> tests. There were three tests using it:
>>
>> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/ReferencesGC/ReferencesGC.java
>>
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:52:51 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that eliminates the use of Reference.isEnqueued by
> tests. There were three tests using it:
>
> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/ReferencesGC/ReferencesGC.java
> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/WeakReferenceGC/WeakReferenceGC.java
>
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:30:11 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Please review this change that eliminates the use of Reference.isEnqueued by
>> tests. There were three tests using it:
>>
>> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/ReferencesGC/ReferencesGC.java
>>
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:52:51 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that eliminates the use of Reference.isEnqueued by
> tests. There were three tests using it:
>
> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/ReferencesGC/ReferencesGC.java
> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/WeakReferenceGC/WeakReferenceGC.java
>
Please review this change that eliminates the use of Reference.isEnqueued by
tests. There were three tests using it:
vmTestbase/gc/gctests/ReferencesGC/ReferencesGC.java
vmTestbase/gc/gctests/WeakReferenceGC/WeakReferenceGC.java
jdk/java/lang/ref/ReferenceEnqueue.java
In each of them, some
13 matches
Mail list logo
