On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 14:55:32 GMT, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> can I have reviews for this change that adds dedicated filler objects to
>> the VM?
>>
>> Currently, when formatting areas of dead objects all gcs use instances of
>> j.l.Object and int-arrays.
>>
>> This has the
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:45:01 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
>> Thomas Schatzl has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix test
>
> The latest version looks good to me.
Thanks @iklam @walulyai for your reviews
-
PR:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 14:55:32 GMT, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> can I have reviews for this change that adds dedicated filler objects to
>> the VM?
>>
>> Currently, when formatting areas of dead objects all gcs use instances of
>> j.l.Object and int-arrays.
>>
>> This has the
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 14:55:32 GMT, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> can I have reviews for this change that adds dedicated filler objects to
>> the VM?
>>
>> Currently, when formatting areas of dead objects all gcs use instances of
>> j.l.Object and int-arrays.
>>
>> This has the
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 21:51:32 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Do you really need to define a real `FillerObject.java` class? Can't you use
> an internal-only variant of a hidden class to represent this?
I am not sure I understand this request, but of course I am open to try
different approaches. An
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 14:55:32 GMT, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> can I have reviews for this change that adds dedicated filler objects to
>> the VM?
>>
>> Currently, when formatting areas of dead objects all gcs use instances of
>> j.l.Object and int-arrays.
>>
>> This has the
> Hi all,
>
> can I have reviews for this change that adds dedicated filler objects to
> the VM?
>
> Currently, when formatting areas of dead objects all gcs use instances of
> j.l.Object and int-arrays.
>
> This has the drawback of not being easily able to discern whether a given
> object
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 16:45:54 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
>> Thomas Schatzl has updated the pull request incrementally with two
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - iklam review
>> - Test case
>
> src/hotspot/share/classfile/systemDictionaryShared.cpp line 1727:
>
>> 1725:
> Hi all,
>
> can I have reviews for this change that adds dedicated filler objects to
> the VM?
>
> Currently, when formatting areas of dead objects all gcs use instances of
> j.l.Object and int-arrays.
>
> This has the drawback of not being easily able to discern whether a given
> object
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 08:13:33 GMT, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can I have reviews for this change that adds dedicated filler objects to
> the VM?
>
> Currently, when formatting areas of dead objects all gcs use instances of
> j.l.Object and int-arrays.
>
> This has the drawback of
Hi all,
can I have reviews for this change that adds dedicated filler objects to the
VM?
Currently, when formatting areas of dead objects all gcs use instances of
j.l.Object and int-arrays.
This has the drawback of not being easily able to discern whether a given
object is actually dead
11 matches
Mail list logo
