On 3/1/22 18:17, Sean Mullan wrote:
Can you explain in a little more detail as to what the compatibility
issues are with preventing threads in thread pools from calling System.exit?
It is possible, I suppose, that some rather odd programmer is using
a task in a thread pool to exit their
On 01/03/2022 18:17, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 3/1/22 8:01 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 3/1/22 11:45, Andrew Haley wrote:
Sure, you wouldn't
be able to use the default thread pool, but that's no big deal, I
would have
thought.
I'm sorry, I'll say that again. :-)
I meant to say "you
On 3/1/22 8:01 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 3/1/22 11:45, Andrew Haley wrote:
Sure, you wouldn't
be able to use the default thread pool, but that's no big deal, I would have
thought.
I'm sorry, I'll say that again. :-)
I meant to say "you wouldn't be able to use the default thread pool if
On 3/1/22 11:45, Andrew Haley wrote:
Sure, you wouldn't
be able to use the default thread pool, but that's no big deal, I would have
thought.
I'm sorry, I'll say that again. :-)
I meant to say "you wouldn't be able to use the default thread pool if
you wanted to use threads with some
On 2/28/22 15:32, Andrew Haley wrote:
I think all we'd need is a set of capabilities bound to a scope local
at thread startup, and I guess it'd default to "all capabilities".
Trusted code could then override any of those capabilities.
We'd have to make sure that capabilities were inherited by
Von: core-libs-dev im Auftrag von Kasper
Nielsen
Gesendet: Monday, February 28, 2022 9:23:11 PM
An: Ethan McCue
Cc: core-libs-dev
Betreff: Re: Should System.exit be controlled by a Scope Local?
Is there really a need to make this so complicated?
In all the examples I've
Is there really a need to make this so complicated?
In all the examples I've seen so far it would be fine to set
system-exit restrictions up from the program's main class.
So why not just restrict it to the main class by default?
I assume this class is under the control of the user or
an
On 2/28/22 15:12, Sean Mullan wrote:
>
> On 2/27/22 1:47 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> I'd like to explore the use of scope locals as a lightweight means to
>> implement a system of permissions and capabilities for things such as
>> this.
>
> Now you have piqued my curiosity, as I have explored a
On 2/27/22 1:47 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
I'd like to explore the use of scope locals as a lightweight means to
implement a system of permissions and capabilities for things such as
this.
Now you have piqued my curiosity, as I have explored a capability based
model for intercepting
Where would be a good place to do that sort of surveying? The mechanism
does not seem to be that popular in open source software ( though that does
make a degree of sense ), or at least the software grep.app scans
https://grep.app/search?q=permission.getName%28%29.startsWith%28%22exitVM%22%29
On 26/02/2022 22:14, Ethan McCue wrote:
I have a feeling this has been considered and I might just be articulating
the obvious - but:
As called out in JEP 411, one of the remaining legitimate uses of the
Security Manager is to intercept calls to System.exit. This seems like a
decent use case
better to have a solution for these
> > >> situations.
> > >> (`Continuation` might help us?)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 11:07 PM Ethan McCue > <mailto:et...@mccu
>>> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 8:01 AM Remi Forax mailto:fo...@univ-mlv.fr>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ethan,
>>>> there is a far simpler solution, call org.apache.ivy.run(args,
true)
>>>> instead of org.apache.ivy.main(args) in yo
11:07 PM Ethan McCue wrote:
> >>
> >>> That undermines my point some, but I think the overall shape of the use
> >>> case still makes sense
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 8:01 AM Remi Forax wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi
26, 2022 11:14:19 PM
Subject: Should System.exit be controlled by a Scope Local?
I have a feeling this has been considered and I might just be
articulating
the obvious - but:
As called out in JEP 411, one of the remaining legitimate uses of the
Security Manager is to intercept calls to System.
On 2/26/22 22:14, Ethan McCue wrote:
As called out in JEP 411, one of the remaining legitimate uses of the
Security Manager is to intercept calls to System.exit. This seems like a
decent use case for the Scope Local mechanism.
It could well be. One problem, at least in the preview version of
gt;> > regards,
>> > Rémi
>> >
>> > - Original Message -
>> > > From: "Ethan McCue"
>> > > To: "core-libs-dev"
>> > > Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2022 11:14:19 PM
>> > > Subject: S
an McCue"
> > > To: "core-libs-dev"
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2022 11:14:19 PM
> > > Subject: Should System.exit be controlled by a Scope Local?
> >
> > > I have a feeling this has been considered and I might just be
> >
provider.
>
> regards,
> Rémi
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Ethan McCue"
> > To: "core-libs-dev"
> > Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2022 11:14:19 PM
> > Subject: Should System.exit be controlled by a Scope Local?
>
> >
11:14:19 PM
> Subject: Should System.exit be controlled by a Scope Local?
> I have a feeling this has been considered and I might just be articulating
> the obvious - but:
>
> As called out in JEP 411, one of the remaining legitimate uses of the
> Security Manager is to intercept c
I have a feeling this has been considered and I might just be articulating
the obvious - but:
As called out in JEP 411, one of the remaining legitimate uses of the
Security Manager is to intercept calls to System.exit. This seems like a
decent use case for the Scope Local mechanism.
public
21 matches
Mail list logo
