Mandy Chung wrote:
:
It'd be good to write a regression test for this bug to be included
in the jdk fix. I can help writing it if you want.
I looked at the changes in the jdk repository and they look good to me too.
Adding the bit to the jdk_version_info structure is a neat way to deal
with
On 9/7/2011 9:32 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Mandy Chung wrote:
:
It'd be good to write a regression test for this bug to be included
in the jdk fix. I can help writing it if you want.
I looked at the changes in the jdk repository and they look good to me
too.
Thanks for the review, Alan.
Just so that there is no confusion. These changes by themselves
are not intended to fix 4243978 and 4268317. They just fix 4965777 --
that is make GC and the ReferenceHandler thread use the discovered
field for linking the elements of the pending list.
I am assuming that 4243978 and 4268317
[i left the embedded inlines below for the cores-lib folk
who may have missed part of the exchange because of non-membership of
the posters.]
Hi Stefan --
On 09/05/11 10:49, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
Hi Ramki,
On 09/05/2011 07:29 PM, Ramki Ramakrishna wrote:
Hi Stefan --
Thanks for your
Hi Ramki,
I reviewed the JDK webrev:
JDK webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysr/4965777/jdk/webrev/
The change looks good. I ran the JCK tests on solaris-i586
that I can reproduce the bug with JDK 7 and verify that they pass
with your fix.
It'd be good to write a regression test for this
Hi Mandy --
On 09/06/11 17:49, Mandy Chung wrote:
Hi Ramki,
I reviewed the JDK webrev:
JDK webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysr/4965777/jdk/webrev/
The change looks good. I ran the JCK tests on solaris-i586
that I can reproduce the bug with JDK 7 and verify that they pass
with your
