Re: RFR: 8325485: IncrementInstructions.of(int, int) is not storing the args [v2]

2024-04-09 Thread Jan Lahoda
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:47:08 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote: >> ClassFile API provides two sets of instructions implementations (bound and >> unbound). >> Unbound implementation of `IncrementInstruction::constant` returns invalid >> value. >> This bug discovered a hole in the ClassFile API test

Re: RFR: 8325485: IncrementInstructions.of(int, int) is not storing the args [v2]

2024-02-26 Thread Chen Liang
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:47:08 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote: >> ClassFile API provides two sets of instructions implementations (bound and >> unbound). >> Unbound implementation of `IncrementInstruction::constant` returns invalid >> value. >> This bug discovered a hole in the ClassFile API test

Re: RFR: 8325485: IncrementInstructions.of(int, int) is not storing the args [v2]

2024-02-09 Thread Adam Sotona
> ClassFile API provides two sets of instructions implementations (bound and > unbound). > Unbound implementation of `IncrementInstruction::constant` returns invalid > value. > This bug discovered a hole in the ClassFile API test coverage. > > This patch provides very simple fix of

Re: RFR: 8325485: IncrementInstructions.of(int, int) is not storing the args

2024-02-09 Thread Andrey Turbanov
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 13:18:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote: > ClassFile API provides two sets of instructions implementations (bound and > unbound). > Unbound implementation of `IncrementInstruction::constant` returns invalid > value. > This bug discovered a hole in the ClassFile API test coverage. >

RFR: 8325485: IncrementInstructions.of(int, int) is not storing the args

2024-02-08 Thread Adam Sotona
ClassFile API provides two sets of instructions implementations (bound and unbound). Unbound implementation of `IncrementInstruction::constant` returns invalid value. This bug discovered a hole in the ClassFile API test coverage. This patch provides very simple fix of `IncrementInstruction`