Hi,
in thread [1] I mention a clean room implementation of
Double.toString(double) and my willingness to contribute it to the
OpenJDK project to fix [2].
As of today, my code resides in a module that exports a package simply
named "math". The reason I do not alter the original OpenJDK
Hi,
Also, the new constructor should be public so it can be used in other
places.
It seems in some cases the error message is a literal in the VM code (
typeArrayKlass.cpp:149).
That would seem to be a duplication and not really a good idea.
Roger
On 4/18/18 10:30 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi,
The message can be simpler and more efficiently convey the information.
It should be more consistent with existing uses of
ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException as
throw by: Objects.checkIndex(index, length).
Which roughly reads as:
Index %d out-of-bounds for length %d
Regards, Roger
On
On 04/18/2018 03:58 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 04/18/2018 02:55 PM, raffaello.giulie...@gmail.com wrote:
>> So, how can I best proceed with this initial delivery?
>
> Once you have an OpenJDK id you can get an account on cr.openjdk.java.net.
> That's where you should put your changes.
...and
On 2018-04-18 16:35, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 04/18/2018 03:58 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 04/18/2018 02:55 PM, raffaello.giulie...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> So, how can I best proceed with this initial delivery?
>>
>> Once you have an OpenJDK id you can get an account on cr.openjdk.java.net.
>>
Hi,
please review this change that moves the use of SALT to iterator
creation, which would allow for certain startup
optimizations in the future.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201650
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8201650/open.00/
This does make the randomness
Hi,
The requirements to become an OpenJDK Author[1] are fairly modest but follow
from a couple of sponsored contributions after which you can request to
become
an author.
Regards, Roger
[1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#project-author
On 4/18/18 10:49 AM, raffaello.giulie...@gmail.com
Hi,
Please review the changes to the following issue:
Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193877
The proposed fix is located at:
Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8193877/webrev.00/
When padding is used in a pattern where there are unpadded values adjacent to
2018/4/18 10:27:36 -0700, e...@zusammenkunft.net:
> Hello, I would put it on a standalone Git repo on one of the public
> hosting sites lile.Github, especially for a first discussion
> (especially good if added JMH comparisions). I would not expect a id
> quickly/easily and a in-tree webrev could
Hello, I would put it on a standalone Git repo on one of the public hosting
sites lile.Github, especially for a first discussion (especially good if added
JMH comparisions). I would not expect a id quickly/easily and a in-tree webrev
could be created by sponsor for final ok.
Bernd
Von:
On 04/18/2018 02:55 PM, raffaello.giulie...@gmail.com wrote:
> So, how can I best proceed with this initial delivery?
Once you have an OpenJDK id you can get an account on cr.openjdk.java.net.
That's where you should put your changes.
--
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd.
+1 from me, thanks!
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
> Alan, David,
>
> Any more update/comment/suggestion on this one? I have updated
> DeInflate.java with
> some new test cases to cover the newly added methods. Good to go?
>
> -Sherman
>
> On
Hi Pallavi,
The fix here seems to make padding to a fixed width incompatible with
adjacent value parsing.
That's not intuitive, since adjacent value parsing is intended to allow
more flexible parsing
of a combination leading fixed-width fields and subsequent variable
length fields.
The
Alan, David,
Any more update/comment/suggestion on this one? I have updated DeInflate.java
with
some new test cases to cover the newly added methods. Good to go?
-Sherman
On 04/10/2018 08:49 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/6341887.David.Lloyd/webrev/
Thanks,
Hi,
Minor improvement in readability (and probably perf) for Pattern. Switch is
more consistent with the rest of the impl and the resulting tableswitch
avoids a comparison for possessives.
-Isaac
--- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/regex/Pattern.java
+++
+1
There is one extra space in Optional.java: line 163: "is__not".
Thanks, Roger
On 4/18/18 2:06 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
OK, looks good! +1 from me.
s'marks
On 4/17/18 10:34 PM, Vivek Theeyarath wrote:
Hi Stuart,
Done with the changes
Adding core-libs-dev as you're changing
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException.
I appreciate the intent here but I find the messages excessively
verbose. The basic error is:
index N is outside range [0, length-1]
David
On 18/04/2018 6:09 PM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
Hi,
I would like
Hello Volker.
(I'm sorry for duplicate posting, I did bad operation)
What's actually the difference between "ibm-942C" and "ibm-942"?
They have two differences on single byte part:
1. Control Character rotation for 0x1A and 0x1C, 0x7F [2]
2. Character replacement for 0x5C and 0x7E (0xFE, 0xFF)
OK, looks good! +1 from me.
s'marks
On 4/17/18 10:34 PM, Vivek Theeyarath wrote:
Hi Stuart,
Done with the changes
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vtheeyarath/8184693/webrev.05/ .
Regards
Vivek
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Marks
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 8:56 AM
To: Vivek
> 17 apr. 2018 kl. 00:52 skrev mark.reinh...@oracle.com:
>
> 2018/4/12 1:12:36 -0700, raffaello.giulie...@gmail.com:
>> my code is now ready to be uploaded to the OpenJDK reps. Currently it
>> resides on GitHub and is under the "GPLv2 + Classpath Exception"
>> license, with myself as the
Hi Claes,
Moving the use of SALT to iterator creation is a great idea! You change looks
really good.
Thanks for making the change!
Jiangli
> On Apr 18, 2018, at 8:20 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> please review this change that moves the use of SALT to
Adding back hotspot-runtime-dev - please reply-all
On 19/04/2018 1:26 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi,
Also, the new constructor should be public so it can be used in other
places.
That takes this from being a simple change that adds more info to the
exception message, to an API addition that
22 matches
Mail list logo