Re: [core-workflow] Presentation on Rust's GitHub based automation tools

2016-02-10 Thread Brett Cannon
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 at 23:21 Nick Coghlan wrote: > I was at linux.conf.au 2016 last week, and one of the presentations > was from Mozilla's Emily Dunham on some of the infrastructure > automation they use with Rust and other GitHub based projects: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIageYT0Vgg I

Re: [core-workflow] Presentation on Rust's GitHub based automation tools

2016-02-10 Thread Brett Cannon
See https://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/2016-February/000469.html and Ezio's follow-up (and yes, you can help :) . On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 at 04:29 Maciej Szulik wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 at 13:11 Maciej Szulik wrote: >

Re: [core-workflow] Presentation on Rust's GitHub based automation tools

2016-02-10 Thread Maciej Szulik
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 at 13:11 Maciej Szulik wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> > On 7 February 2016 at 20:23, Maciej Szulik wrote: >> >> Talking from the position of owning a similar bot in OpenShift, I qui

Re: [core-workflow] Presentation on Rust's GitHub based automation tools

2016-02-09 Thread Brett Cannon
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 at 13:11 Maciej Szulik wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > On 7 February 2016 at 20:23, Maciej Szulik wrote: > >> Talking from the position of owning a similar bot in OpenShift, I quite > >> certain that it's really hard to have common base. Since

Re: [core-workflow] Presentation on Rust's GitHub based automation tools

2016-02-08 Thread Maciej Szulik
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 7 February 2016 at 20:23, Maciej Szulik wrote: >> Talking from the position of owning a similar bot in OpenShift, I quite >> certain that it's really hard to have common base. Since these bots >> address specific project and there are not t

Re: [core-workflow] Presentation on Rust's GitHub based automation tools

2016-02-07 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 7 February 2016 at 20:23, Maciej Szulik wrote: > Talking from the position of owning a similar bot in OpenShift, I quite > certain that it's really hard to have common base. Since these bots > address specific project and there are not two exactly the same projects > with exactly the same work

Re: [core-workflow] Presentation on Rust's GitHub based automation tools

2016-02-07 Thread Brett Cannon
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 at 02:23 Maciej Szulik wrote: > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Berker Peksağ > wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> I was at linux.conf.au 2016 last week, and one of the presentations > >> was from Mozilla's Emily Dunham on some of the infrast

Re: [core-workflow] Presentation on Rust's GitHub based automation tools

2016-02-07 Thread Maciej Szulik
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Berker Peksağ wrote: > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> I was at linux.conf.au 2016 last week, and one of the presentations >> was from Mozilla's Emily Dunham on some of the infrastructure >> automation they use with Rust and other GitHub bas

Re: [core-workflow] Presentation on Rust's GitHub based automation tools

2016-02-07 Thread Berker Peksağ
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > I was at linux.conf.au 2016 last week, and one of the presentations > was from Mozilla's Emily Dunham on some of the infrastructure > automation they use with Rust and other GitHub based projects: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIageYT0Vgg

[core-workflow] Presentation on Rust's GitHub based automation tools

2016-02-06 Thread Nick Coghlan
I was at linux.conf.au 2016 last week, and one of the presentations was from Mozilla's Emily Dunham on some of the infrastructure automation they use with Rust and other GitHub based projects: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIageYT0Vgg In addition to their merge bot project homu (which we've talk