[coreboot] Could coreboot work on my laptop?

2009-05-02 Thread Lionel Broche
Hi, First of all, congratulations for your work! I wish you a great success with coreboot, it really is an interesting and useful project. I have a laptop with the following material. Do you think I can install Coreboot? Motherboard: Manufacturer: Intel Corporation Product

Re: [coreboot] [v2] r4250 - in trunk/coreboot-v2: ...

2009-05-02 Thread Peter Stuge
s...@coreboot.org wrote: Log: Run dos2unix on all files: Thanks! Please watch out for line endings when committing. Thanks! //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] [v2] r4248 - in trunk/coreboot-v2/src/ma inboard: rca/rm4100 thomson/ip1000

2009-05-02 Thread Joseph Smith
On Sat, 02 May 2009 13:46:25 +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net wrote: Hi Joe, there is a small problem with your commit. Both files has their line endings (newlines) changed from LF (Unix style) to CR+LF (DOS style). On 02.05.2009 02:50, s...@coreboot.org

Re: [coreboot] [v2] r4250 - in trunk/coreboot-v2: ...

2009-05-02 Thread Joseph Smith
On Sat, 2 May 2009 15:26:50 +0200, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: s...@coreboot.org wrote: Log: Run dos2unix on all files: Thanks! Please watch out for line endings when committing. Thanks! Thanks Peter, I will store that command in my memory bank :-) -- Thanks, Joseph Smith

[coreboot] [PATCH] i82801xx assign PIRQs in mainboard Config.lb or use default

2009-05-02 Thread Joseph Smith
This patch lets you assign PIRQs in mainboard Config.lb or use the default ones listed in i82801xx_lpc.c. Once and if everyone converts to the better way of assign PIRQs in mainboard Config.lb the option of using the defaults can be removed. The patch enables a margin of time to do so. --

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] i82801xx assign PIRQs in mainboard Config.lb or use default

2009-05-02 Thread Joseph Smith
On Sat, 02 May 2009 11:15:32 -0400, Joseph Smith j...@settoplinux.org wrote: This patch lets you assign PIRQs in mainboard Config.lb or use the default ones listed in i82801xx_lpc.c. Once and if everyone converts to the better way of assign PIRQs in mainboard Config.lb the option of using

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] i82801xx assign PIRQs in mainboard Config.lb or use default

2009-05-02 Thread ron minnich
Very nice. Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich rminn...@gmail.com -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] r4233/4234 broke h8dme (serial corruption + hang)

2009-05-02 Thread ron minnich
It does look like an SMP machine in which both CPUs are trying to run as the BSP. Possible? ron -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] [v2] r4251 - trunk/coreboot-v2/src/southbridge/intel/i82801xx

2009-05-02 Thread svn
Author: linux_junkie Date: 2009-05-02 23:30:57 +0200 (Sat, 02 May 2009) New Revision: 4251 Modified: trunk/coreboot-v2/src/southbridge/intel/i82801xx/chip.h trunk/coreboot-v2/src/southbridge/intel/i82801xx/i82801xx_lpc.c Log: Assign PIRQs in mainboard Config.lb or use the default ones

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] i82801xx assign PIRQs in mainboard Config.lb or use default

2009-05-02 Thread Joseph Smith
On Sat, 2 May 2009 13:39:53 -0700, ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote: Very nice. Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich rminn...@gmail.com Thanks r4251 -- Thanks, Joseph Smith Set-Top-Linux www.settoplinux.org -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org

[coreboot] [PATCH] fix the XIP size and fallback computations for M2V-MX SE

2009-05-02 Thread Rudolf Marek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, It seems I'm quite tired to formulate the description of the patch accurately I hope it is understandable somehow. Following patch fixes the XIP computation issue. I removed the normal image because it was not working anyway (it was

Re: [coreboot] r4233/4234 broke h8dme (serial corruption + hang)

2009-05-02 Thread Ward Vandewege
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 01:42:34PM -0700, ron minnich wrote: It does look like an SMP machine in which both CPUs are trying to run as the BSP. Possible? It's definitely an SMP machine, two dual-core CPUs. Thanks, Ward. -- Ward Vandewege w...@fsf.org Free Software Foundation - Senior

Re: [coreboot] LinuxTag 2009 in Berlin, June 24-27

2009-05-02 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 01.05.2009 13:26, Joseph Smith wrote: (Or my top hat flash for these boards if that works out.) What is this? http://www.coreboot.org/Top_Hat_Flash I hope to build something similar for M2A-VM boards. The pinout and my multimeter measurements certainly look favourable. Ah yes. A

Re: [coreboot] r4233/4234 broke h8dme (serial corruption + hang)

2009-05-02 Thread ron minnich
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Ward Vandewege w...@gnu.org wrote: On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 01:42:34PM -0700, ron minnich wrote: It does look like an SMP machine in which both CPUs are trying to run as the BSP. Possible? It's definitely an SMP machine, two dual-core CPUs. So can you see

Re: [coreboot] r4233/4234 broke h8dme (serial corruption + hang)

2009-05-02 Thread Ward Vandewege
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 04:38:12PM -0700, ron minnich wrote: On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Ward Vandewege w...@gnu.org wrote: On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 01:42:34PM -0700, ron minnich wrote: It does look like an SMP machine in which both CPUs are trying to run as the BSP. Possible?