On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:15:32AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
There is no coreboot gdb support
There is some gdb support in coreboot, but maybe not for ARM?
What I tried to say is that it happens to early to connect to coreboot
using gdb support, but maybe I'm wrong.
so I used qemu '-s
So, if you comment that one line out, do things work for you? Just
double checking.
ron
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Piotr Król pietrush...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:15:32AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
There is no coreboot gdb support
There is some gdb support in
got accepted. See you there.
ron
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
There's lots of really nice work going on with clang and other tools.
I just want to put out a word of caution, based on what I'm seeing.
A number of these tests are going in with global changes, no testing,
and in some examples, no clear improvement or bug fix, e.g. remove
all blank lines at the
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 07:36:42AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
So, if you comment that one line out, do things work for you? Just
double checking.
Comment is not enough to make it work. VE_NORFLASHALIAS has to be -1, then it
works for me. So patch for QEMU is:
diff --git a/hw/arm/vexpress.c
I can't recall for ARM, it's been more than a year since I used qemu
on that platform. That said, ... on the platforms we use ROM is in low
memory. What's your coreboot system.map say?
ron
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Piotr Król pietrush...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 01:51:16PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
I can't recall for ARM, it's been more than a year since I used qemu
on that platform. That said, ... on the platforms we use ROM is in low
memory. What's your coreboot system.map say?
I'm not sure what 'coreboot system.map' is but
So what this is saying is that we expect the ROM for coreboot to start
at 64K. I hope this makes sense to you. Does this conflict with some
qemu expectation, do you know?
ron
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Piotr Król pietrush...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 01:51:16PM -0700, ron
Sorry, in other words, how much ROM are you setting up on that qemu
board? The 'execute outside ram or rom' is usually a jump to an IP
that qemu does not recognize as ROM/RAM.
I suspect our emulator is assuming SRAM in there somewhere, can you
check? Certainly we depend on SRAM on the real
Hi,
It seems that the status-to-wiki.sh script is broken, apart from being
non-portable, it appears that the board model/manufacturer is being
used as the date on Linux when run in a bash shell
date: invalid date `yangtze'
date: invalid date `yabel'
date: invalid date `xe7501devkit'
date:
Am 12.08.2014 um 00:37 schrieb Piotr Król:
Anyone know how to load bootblock debug symbols to gdb when debugging
using '-s -S' option ?
add-symbol-file $filename $loadaddr
Patrick
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
Am 12.08.2014 um 03:27 schrieb Sevan / Venture37:
It seems that the status-to-wiki.sh script is broken, apart from being
non-portable, it appears that the board model/manufacturer is being
used as the date on Linux when run in a bash shell
The status-to-wiki script is run hourly on the server,
I know why it didn't work. For GPIO8 it should be:
'Method(_L18, 0, NotSerialized)'
instead of:
'Method(_L08, 0, NotSerialized)'
I don't know why but I heard that gpio in acpi have to be with offset 0x10. Now
it works.
Chris
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
Hi Martin, Wen.
Sorry.. Reading my post I did not make it clear.
SD / USB Boot works well under a full UEFI Bios on Baytrail - I.
As Martin says it's not in Seabios yet for Baytrail - I.
But I am sure an updated patch will be coming very soon.
Regards
Julien Snell
Cocom
www.cc-e.co.uk
Tel :-
Wen,
SD Card , SD Card Boot work. We have designed several Boards with SD Card Boot.
Although I would recommend USB3 Boot as it's a magnitude faster.
Regards
Julien Snell
Cocom
www.cc-e.co.uk
Cocom design and manufacture internet connected devices (IoT) Introducing two
new brands
* ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com [140809 05:24]:
Some of furquan's very fine work from -- yegads! -- a year ago is just
now coming upstream. Take a look.
Ron! If you have a link for us, that would be great!
I want to endorse Furquan's great work, however. Not only did it open up
new ways of
16 matches
Mail list logo
