Re: [coreboot] KGPE-D16 BMC port

On 08/29/2017 02:24 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote: Let me know what you think of the OpenBMC system. We're considering allowing bugs to be tracked on GitHub; is this something the community wants to see or would a separate Bugzilla type install be preferred? We want to provide the infrastructure

Re: [coreboot] Libre KCMA-D8's are going for around $260 on newegg

NOTE: I have no idea as to how trustworthy these companies are. http://www.officespecialties.com/asus_computer_international_kcma_d8_server_motherboard_217195_prd1.htm?pSearchQueryId=420212 Ah even better, $250 and now one doesn't have to support a chinese owned newegg.

Re: [coreboot] Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode

On 08/30/2017 12:58 AM, Philipp Stanner wrote: Am 29.08.2017 um 20:15 schrieb Timothy Pearson: On 08/29/2017 06:10 AM, Rene Shuster wrote: Wow. My favorite part is where the NSA itself basically admits that the ME can't be trusted! I wonder if they are looking at other architectures or if

Re: [coreboot] Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode

Am 29.08.2017 um 20:15 schrieb Timothy Pearson: > On 08/29/2017 06:10 AM, Rene Shuster wrote: > > Wow. > > My favorite part is where the NSA itself basically admits that the ME > can't be trusted! I wonder if they are looking at other architectures > or if this HAP bit was enough for their needs?

Re: [coreboot] Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode

I can't download the .pdf file for some reason (maybe the tla's got to it?) http://fm.csl.sri.com/LAW/2009/dobry-law09-HAP-Challenges.pdf can someone send it to me? Thanks Thoughts: Sad this is still not an actual method of disablement, but it doesn't really matter as anyone who buys *new* x86

Re: [coreboot] Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode

OK, thanks for the clarification. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Timothy Pearson < tpear...@raptorengineering.com> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/29/2017 02:57 PM, Leah Rowe wrote: > > > > > > On 29/08/17 19:15, Timothy Pearson wrote: > >> On 08/29/2017

Re: [coreboot] Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/29/2017 02:57 PM, Leah Rowe wrote: > > > On 29/08/17 19:15, Timothy Pearson wrote: >> On 08/29/2017 06:10 AM, Rene Shuster wrote: >>> Wow. > >> My favorite part is where the NSA itself basically admits that the >> ME can't be trusted! I

Re: [coreboot] Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode

http://fm.csl.sri.com/LAW/2009/dobry-law09-HAP-Challenges.pdf (linked in PTSecurity's blogpost) might have the answer to your question, but it's not accessible for me. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Leah Rowe wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > >

Re: [coreboot] Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 29/08/17 19:15, Timothy Pearson wrote: > On 08/29/2017 06:10 AM, Rene Shuster wrote: >> Wow. > > My favorite part is where the NSA itself basically admits that the > ME can't be trusted! I wonder if they are looking at other > architectures

[coreboot] KGPE-D16 BMC port

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 We are pleased to announce that the OpenBMC port for the KGPE-D16 has reached the first release stage! https://www.raptorengineering.com/coreboot/kgpe-d16-bmc-port-status.php While it has inherited some of the rough edges of its Facebook predecessor

Re: [coreboot] Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/29/2017 06:10 AM, Rene Shuster wrote: > Wow. My favorite part is where the NSA itself basically admits that the ME can't be trusted! I wonder if they are looking at other architectures or if this HAP bit was enough for their needs? - --

[coreboot] New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for coreboot

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found with Coverity Scan. 1 new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found with Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) ** CID 1380036: Control flow issues (NO_EFFECT)

Re: [coreboot] Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode

Wow. On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Matthias Gliwka wrote: > Some new development on disabling Intel ME 11: http://blog.ptsecurity. > com/2017/08/disabling-intel-me.html > > Kind regards, > Matthias Gliwka > > -- > coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org >

[coreboot] REPLY: INT 13H

Hello Vincenzo, Since you replied only to me, I would like to write my reply also to the whole list, in order to draw some more experienced people with INT 13H knowledge. Explicitly, I do not know with 100% certainty if OSes direct via INT 13H some data to be written to the USB and/or SATA. It