[coreboot] Re: Lenovo T60p: Regression in master branch (resource allocator changes?)

2020-06-28 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Nico, Am 28.06.20 um 13:21 schrieb Nico Huber: On 28.06.20 11:35, Paul Menzel wrote: The only remarkable difference in the logs is:     -PCI: 06:00.0 bridge ctrl <- 016b this seems very suspicious. Bit 3 enables VGA decoding. It shouldn't matter because it's behind another bridge

[coreboot] Re: Lenovo T60p: Regression in master branch (resource allocator changes?)

2020-06-28 Thread Nico Huber
Hi Paul, On 28.06.20 11:35, Paul Menzel wrote: > The only remarkable difference in the logs is: > >     -PCI: 06:00.0 bridge ctrl <- 016b this seems very suspicious. Bit 3 enables VGA decoding. It shouldn't matter because it's behind another bridge that hasn't the bit set, but still, WTF? I have

[coreboot] Lenovo T60p: Regression in master branch (resource allocator changes?)

2020-06-28 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear coreboot folks, On the Lenovo T60p (with external AMD/ATI graphics) there was unfortunately a regression in the master branch. As it is bricked now, I am only able to provide logs, and won’t be able to test or bisect for quite some time. I successfully tested 4.11-1593-g49111cd2ba [1]