[coreboot] Abandoning ~250 coreboot patches older than 18 months

It's patch cleanup time again. This cleanup was last done almost 2 years ago, so there are a lot of old patches that haven't been touched in a while. Next week I'm going to abandon all of the open patches that haven't been touched in over 18 months. The list of roughly 250 patches to be

[coreboot] Re: Unresolved comments on Gerrit

For anyone who doesn't understand what Patrick is referring to, any comments made in for a file need to be marked as resolved before the patches can be submitted now. Top level comments made with the "Reply" button and saying something nice, do not need to be resolved To see what comments need

[coreboot] Re: Atom C2000 processor FSP 1.0 initialization process fail if read SMBus0 before.

I'd check the smbus base address right before the FSP starts with and without your change. If it's only set with your change, then try clearing it before calling the FSP. See what the BAR is after the FSP runs, and make sure that the address coreboot is using is the same. The early FSPs had a

[coreboot] coreboot leadership meeting minutes for June 5

Attendees: == Patrick, Matt, Stefan, Arthur, David, Felix, Ron, Philipp, Martin, Michal (3mdeb) Topics: === ### New feature enablement with gerrit 3.0? * [https://twitter.com/GerritReview/status/1128687067217768448](https://twitter.com/GerritReview/status/1128687067217768448)

[coreboot] Re: coreboot leadership meeting minutes for May 8 & May 22

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 7:13 PM Julius Werner wrote: > > ... > In general I think it's fine if you discuss things on the call as they > come up, but if you notice that it's something that would interest the > community at large (e.g. proposed style changes) it would be nice if > you could

[coreboot] coreboot leadership meeting minutes for May 8 & May 22

coreboot leadership meeting notes are now public: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NRXqXcLBp5pFkHiJbrLdv3Spqh1Hu086HYkKrgKjeDQ/edit#heading=h.j7tqwova2640 Anyone interested in joining the leadership meetings in the future can check the calendar on the coreboot website for call-in information.

[coreboot] Re: Gpg keys for coreboot distribution

Hi Chris, I'll get my public key uploaded to the website shortly. Thanks for pointing out the issue. Martin On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 12:34 PM Chris Laprise wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm about to embark on a coreboot build+flash per Mike Banon's G505s > page, but before building I want to verify

[coreboot] Re: What maintenance is expected from coreboot developers & companies

require bugfixes, or would adding new features to the chip be expected? Or even just reviews of code affecting their chip? Martin On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 10:01 AM Peter Stuge wrote: > > Martin Roth wrote: > > I'd like to discuss the issue of what's expected from developers after >

[coreboot] What maintenance is expected from coreboot developers & companies

I'd like to discuss the issue of what's expected from developers after code is added to the coreboot tree. It seems like there's a feeling that if a company pushes code to coreboot, or hires someone to push code to coreboot that there's an obligation to help maintain that code going forward.

[coreboot] April 10 and April 24 coreboot leadership meeting minutes

-- 24 April 2019 meeting minutes -- Attendees: StefanR, WernerZ, PatrickG, MartinR, MattD, Dhendricks, FelixH, PhilippD, Jay Trivedi, Aheymans

[coreboot] Self-Nominations for coreboot leadership role

Hello all, In recent months, Marc Jones, a longtime contributor and leader in the coreboot community, hasn't been able to participate as much as he has wanted to, and is opening up his leadership position for someone who is better able to focus on it. The coreboot leadership is looking for a

[coreboot] Re: GSoC 2019 - HW bringup

Hi Alex, I think that porting the gigabyte platform could be at least part of a GSOC project. The port by itself probably wouldn't be enough to be considered a full project, since much of the work can already be done automatically by autoport. I'd probably discourage the HP port due to the age

[coreboot] coreboot leadership meeting minutes for 27 March 2019

Attendees: Julius Werner, Patrick Georgi, Martin Roth, Stefan Reinauer, Werner Zeh, Philipp Deppenwiese Make the coreboot leadership process more open - We need to start posting the meeting minutes to the mailing list again. - Discussed whether to make the coreboot leadership meeting public

Re: [coreboot] Initializing the VBIOS in coreboot does not currently work. VBIOS initialized in SeaBios works correctly

I don't think the issue was ever fully debugged. On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:05 AM Jorge Fernandez Monteagudo wrote: > > Hi, > > > Anybody could give me more info about this message I've seen in: > > > https://www.coreboot.org/Board:amd/parmer > > > at the end you can see: > > > Other issues > >

[coreboot] coreboot static analysis - coverity & scan-build

coreboot now has nightly static analysis using scan-build: https://www.coreboot.org/scan-build/ We aren't currently keeping any sort of metrics or making a global list of all errors, we're just publishing the output for the individual boards. coreboot also runs bi-weekly scans using coverity's

Re: [coreboot] wiki backup

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:35 PM Leah Rowe wrote: > On 14/06/18 19:01, Martin Roth wrote: > > * The wiki requires a separate login from everything else, which > > has to be created manually. > Not only that, but it wasn't clear how to get an account in the first > pla

Re: [coreboot] wiki backup

I feel like we've discussed this a number of times, but maybe it hasn't happened completely in open forums where everyone involved can see it. If that's the case, I apologize. This isn't really a decision that can just be voted upon and if enough people want to keep the wiki, the direction would

[coreboot] coreboot release 4.8 - Please help with release notes and testing

Just a reminder that we're going to do the release in on May 15, 8 days from now, and we need help with the release notes. I've started them at https://pads.ccc.de/yGXyCFe7g7 and have added a list of commits to the bottom of the document for reference. If you have a favorite commit, or feel that

[coreboot] coreboot release 4.8 - Targeting May 15.

The coreboot 4.8 release is planned for May 15. That's the day that we'll choose the commit to base the release on and create the release tag in git. The tarballs will be available on the website shortly afterwards. For anyone who feels like contributing to the release notes, you can work on

Re: [coreboot] [URGENT] Full List of AMD-based boards that are going to be removed from coreboot unless people cough up a board status update

Release notes for 4.7 are published in the download section of coreboot, alongside the releases [1]. If you mean a blog post, I agree, I didn't do one of those for 4.7. As far as the panic about boards getting removed, while it would be good to remove UNUSED boards from the current master

Re: [coreboot] coreboot-checkpath ?

Hi T.mike, You're correct that this check is installed as part of 'make gitconfig'. The code that's installed is in util/gitconfig/precommit. For time reasons, not all of the tests that are run on the server are run in this script To run all of the checks that are run on the server locally,

Re: [coreboot] Has anyone built the memtest86+ payload recently?

the normal/production payload is a > Linux kernel. > > > > Thanks, > > > > - Jay > > > > *From:* coreboot [mailto:coreboot-boun...@coreboot.org] *On Behalf Of *Martin > Roth > *Sent:* Monday, March 12, 2018 10:18 AM > *To:* Jay Talbott > *Cc:* corebo

Re: [coreboot] Has anyone built the memtest86+ payload recently?

Hi Jay, Are they using the coreboot version of memtest86plus? What commit is being built? What version of GCC? Building with GCC 7.3.0 from the latest commit at review.coreboot.org/memtest86plus, I do get one warning that should be cleaned up, but it builds fine. The errors you posted look

Re: [coreboot] Does the coreboot build system support external patches?

coreboot uses the site-local directory to allow users to extend the coreboot build outside of the regular coreboot coreboot files. Create the coreboot/site-local directory, and add Makefile.inc and Kconfig files. Both of these files will get picked up by coreboot. To run steps at the start of

Re: [coreboot] What’s the release plan for coreboot 4.7?

r cancelled ? If delayed, what's the > blocking issue ? > > Thanks, > Youness. > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Martin Roth <gauml...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The release will happen towards the end of the month. Generally I >> try to have the release sched

Re: [coreboot] AGESA fam15 code removals

I've got a supermicro H8SCM board, although I don't think I've ever tried to boot it, so I don't know its state. I also suspect that it's got a family 10h processor, not a fam15. I can try to get it set up this weekend, and I can bring it to the conference with me if that would help. Here's the

Re: [coreboot] What’s the release plan for coreboot 4.7?

The release will happen towards the end of the month. Generally I try to have the release scheduled a bit before the month ends so there's a little room to slip. I'll sit down this weekend and start sorting out where we are and send out another email with release plans. If there are any bugs in

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Successful build with GCC 7.2 and IASL 20170831 for coreboot 4.7

I'd say that it doesn't make sense to require that coreboot builds with anything other than the coreboot toolchain. Additionally, It isn't reasonable to introduce a new requirement this close to the release. Martin On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Paul Menzel

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot support for atom c3000

Hi Tirumalesh, The patch for the main code is here: https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/20861/ SOC code: https://review.coreboot.org/cgit/coreboot.git/tree/src/soc/intel/denverton_ns The only board that uses it right now is the CRB: https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/20862/ Mainboard code:

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot support for atom c3000

Hi Tirumalesh, Coreboot does support c2000 - "Rangeley", and there are patches in review for c3000 currently. Martin On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Tirumalesh wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to coreboot, could someone help me understand > > 1. Does coreboot support atom

[coreboot] coreboot community meeting: August 17, 2017

Last week's meeting was another quick meeting, so the suggestion was made to switch from bi-weekly to monthly (every 4 weeks). The next meeting will bee Thursday, September 14. Check the calendar to find the meeting in your timezone:. https://coreboot.org/calendar We'd also like to see if we

[coreboot] Abandoning patches older than 18 months

It's patch cleanup time again. Next week I'm going to abandon all of the open patches that haven't been touched in over 18 months. The list of 35 patches to be abandoned is here: https://review.coreboot.org/#/q/status:open+before:2016-02-15 As always, if there's anything that is still useful and

Re: [coreboot] Bay Trail uCode headers out of date

You can also find the microcode in the older FSP packages: https://downloadmirror.intel.com/25063/eng/Baytrail_FSP_Gold4.tgz M013067222D, M0130673321, M0130678815, M0130679901 Unfortunately, these files didn't make the transition into the new github site. The debug version of the FSP that's

[coreboot] Volunteer needed to host the North American coreboot conference 2018

We are currently looking for a volunteer to host the 2018 North American coreboot conference. The only real requirements for the location is that it's relatively close to a major airport and that it can hold 30-50 people comfortably. From the feedback we got after the Denver conference, it

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot make script do not use custom, seabiosconfig file.

There are numerous places in shell scripts where '~' doesn't expand to match $HOME. I'd recommend putting the config in the coreboot directory and setting the config file to './.seabiosconfig'. If you really want it in your home directory, you can use '$$HOME/.seabiosconfig'. Martin On Thu, Jun

[coreboot] Adding test configurations for jenkins builds

We recently added the ability for anyone to submit a configuration for the jenkins test builds. This will help us to build-test currently untested configurations. To add a new test configuration for jenkins, add a miniconfig for the platform into the coreboot/configs directory. The

Re: [coreboot] soc/amd/stoneyridge

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 4:33 AM, Paul Menzel wrote: ... > Seeing the lack of manpower for AMD systems, I am concerned about > two(?) solutions that need to be maintained. If the current experiment > succeeds, there should be a roadmap how the current boards

Re: [coreboot] Can you please send me your Intel ME firmware dump?

Also, IIRC, the network drivers communicate with the ME (on some, if not all versions of the ME) so there can be personal data (network SSIDs) saved in your BIOS ROM. If you don't want these to be public, maybe you don't want to post your ME binary. Martin On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 5:27 AM,

[coreboot] coreboot community meeting minutes for June 8, 2017

These are the minutes from yesterday's coreboot community meeting. Information about the next meeting is at the bottom. Today's meeting was very short again, with not much news due to a focus on the Denver conference for the past couple of weeks. We had a total of 7 people attending.

Re: [coreboot] Denver conference

We *DO* have coreboot lanyards this year! https://drive.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/10_xsPK6JpZx8mRXtP3xkKz8TcfezW-m4SQ/view?usp=sharing We will be able to register people at the door if they show up, but they're going to be on their own for lunch, and they get no swag. So hopefully everyone

[coreboot] Denver conference

Everyone who is attending the Denver conference should have gotten an invoice from the Software Freedom Conservancy, and an email about the conference from me. If you are planning on attending and have not received these emails, please let me know immediately so we can get you accounted for.

[coreboot] coreboot community meeting minutes for May 25, 2017

These are the minutes from yesterday's coreboot community meeting. Information about the next meeting is at the bottom. The meeting yesterday was very short, with only 5 people attending. ### Thursday May 25, 2017 General

Re: [coreboot] ASUS KGPE-D16 Automated Test Failure [master]

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Timothy Pearson wrote: ... >> It's this a false positive? i.e. it's a problem with the test or >> actually coreboot doesn't boot? ... > I've been wondering if I should lower the debug level on the test stand > for this particular

Re: [coreboot] 2017 North American coreboot Conference

, May 25, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Juliana Rodrigues <juliana.o...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey, > > It is a shame that I've learned about the conference just now. > Plane tickets to Denver are too expensive atm. > > Juliana > > 2017-05-25 23:43 GMT-03:00 Martin Roth <gauml...@gmai

Re: [coreboot] 2017 North American coreboot Conference

t; > > > From: coreboot [mailto:coreboot-boun...@coreboot.org] On Behalf Of Martin > Roth > Sent: Friday, 3 February 2017 1:32 AM > To: coreboot > Subject: [coreboot] 2017 North American coreboot Conference > > > > We are happy to announce that the 2017 North Ame

Re: [coreboot] ATOM processor E3845

Hi Benjamin, Yes, coreboot does support the E3845 via the Intel FSP. Among other boards, it's used in the Minnowboard turbot, which is supported in src/mainboards/intel/minnowmax Information about the Baytrail FSP can be found here:

Re: [coreboot] Platform / Chip removals after upcoming releases

northbridge/intel/i440bx Here's an example of Arthur Heymans fixing intel/pineview: https://review.coreboot.org/19414 Here's Damien Zammit updating intel/x4x: https://review.coreboot.org/13131 Martin On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote: > Martin Roth wrot

[coreboot] coreboot community meeting minutes for May 11, 2017

These are the minutes from today's coreboot community meeting. Information about the next meeting is at the bottom. ### Thursday, May 11, 2017 General coreboot news & discussions * The coreboot 4.6 release is done. -

[coreboot] Platform / Chip removals after upcoming releases

Along with the latest coreboot release, coreboot announced some standards for removing platforms after upcoming releases. Summary: * After the 4.7 release platforms that do not support cbmem in romstage will be removed. Please see the list of platforms to be removed if no work is done to update

[coreboot] coreboot community meeting minutes for April 27th, 2017

These are the minutes from today's coreboot community meeting. Information about the next meeting is at the bottom. ### Thursday, April 27, 2017 General coreboot news & discussions * 4.6 release delayed? - It will happen this

Re: [coreboot] Unable to run QEMU for Intel Rangeley Mohon Peak

Hi Dhanasekar, You built a BIOS for Mohon Peak, and it's not running on QEMU? I wouldn't expect that to work. That's why we have the coreboot builds that are specifically for QEMU. You wouldn't expect to be able to pull the BIOS off of one board, drop it onto another board and have it work,

[coreboot] Reminder: The North American coreboot conference is June 5 - 7, 2017

https://www.coreboot.org/Denver2017 The North American coreboot conference is in Denver Colorado, USA this year on June 5 - 6, with an extra day on the 7th for hacking and to work on upstream coreboot. That's just under two months from now. Registration --- The prices are: -

[coreboot] coreboot community meeting minutes for March 30th, 2017

Here are the meeting minutes from yesterday's coreboot community meeting. Info about the next meeting (Thursday, April 13) is at the bottom. ### Thursday, March 30th, 2017 General coreboot news & discussions * AGESA updates by

Re: [coreboot] How to update the repository and avoid dirty tree with submodules?

nd add SMU firmware to > be consumed by fanless OPNs. > > Change-Id: I1c9b5ded6b494fac1553cc2ec7756a7a47386ecf > Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson...@gmail.com> > Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18988 > Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) >

Re: [coreboot] Maintain boot order for multiple EFI based OS

d not find fast boot cache area > FSP MRC cache not present. > > Thanks, > Sibi > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Roth [mailto:gauml...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 9:13 PM > To: Rajasekaran, Sibi <sibi_rajaseka...@dell.com> > Cc: Ma

Re: [coreboot] Can we please stop hiding semantic changes behind "found by checkpatch" (Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for coreboot)

Hi Nico, I think that's a great idea, and I'll see what I can set up. We can search the commit message for "no functional changes" or "binary-stable" and then run a build of the previous commit as well as the current commit, then compare the checksums for each build to make sure they match.

Re: [coreboot] Maintain boot order for multiple EFI based OS

As I recall, the rangeley FSP actually *REQUIRES* the mrc cache. Not having it would be a definite problem. Did you select "Use MRC Cache in FMAP"? If you did, that puts it outside of cbfs, so it wouldn't show up in that list. Are you working from upstream coreboot, or a tree from somewhere

Re: [coreboot] tool to rearrange firmware volumes

I think you want ifdtool -n -n | --newlayout update regions using a flashrom layout file Martin On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:03 PM, ron minnich wrote: > the minnowmax has nested firmware volumes. We'd like to rearrange things now > that the wonderful mecleaner has

Re: [coreboot] Flash error - Board information not found

Hi Kory, I'm not sure what the proprietary software is, but you're going to want to use flashrom or a hardware flash tool instead of the proprietary software to flash the ROM. https://www.flashrom.org/Flashrom And just since it always needs to be said: You need to make sure you have a backup

Re: [coreboot] Add me_cleaner to automated tests?

> P.S. I notice you replied to me individually rather than to the list. > If that was not intentional, please feel free to CC the list in your > reply :) > > > On 21/03/2017, Martin Roth <gauml...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Well, ultimately, we'd like to have every board in the

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

So from the start, I just want to say that I'm not arguing just to argue - I want to make sure we pick the correct license here. I'm not really opposed to BY-SA, but I'm not sure I see the benefit to saying that coreboot's documentation can only be shared under that particular version of that

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

Hey Sam. You're absolutely right, and I appreciate you pointing this out. We need to get this fixed. Actually, as part of coreboot joining the Software Freedom Conservancy, our documentation NEEDS an open license of one sort or another. Is there a reason we shouldn't switch to CC BY 4.0? - Do

Re: [coreboot] Add me_cleaner to automated tests?

Most of our current automated testing is just build testing, although we're working to expand that. The boot testing we DO have doesn't currently include any boards with an ME - they're currently all boards that don't require any blobs. Martin On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Sam Kuper

Re: [coreboot] iPXE as payload?

Hi Gert, Yes, it's possible. In the coreboot payload menu, select "[ ] Add a PXE ROM" This opens up a new menu "PXE Options --->" In that menu, the top option is: "PXE ROM to use (Add an existing PXE ROM image) --->" select that, and switch to "( ) Build and add an iPXE ROM" Select the

Re: [coreboot] How come the community meeting is hosted by proprietary software?

Additionally, the meeting software needs to work well for everyone, pretty much anywhere in the world. The coreboot community is an amazingly diverse group. So the meeting method needs to have a way to work well in pretty much any OS you can think of, or there needs to be an alternate method of

[coreboot] coreboot community meeting minutes for March 16th, 2017

Here are the meeting minutes of yesterday's coreboot community meeting. Info about the next meeting (March 31) is at the bottom. ## # Thursday, March 16, 2017 General coreboot news & discussions * Next coreboot release - 4.6 -

Re: [coreboot] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Please join today’s CCM

The meeting is happening in 20 minutes. https://bluejeans.com/616384323 Phone bridge call in numbers: https://www.bluejeans.com/numbers Meeting ID: 616384323 Current agenda & history: https://coreboot-meeting.pads.ccc.de/CommunityMeetingTopics Martin On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Paul

Re: [coreboot] New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for coreboot

Hey, I'm not sure if people pay much attention to these, but you can safely ignore these issues. I'm not even seeing them show up as issues inside coverity, so I'm not sure why they are presented here. 1) These issues are in the chromeec codebase, not the coreboot codebase. We've marked them as

Re: [coreboot] How come the community meeting is hosted by proprietary software?

Mainly we're using proprietary software because it works better than the open source alternatives we tried. We wanted to use the open source solutions, and tried a number of options in the months since the CCM started. They all had serious issues with people not being able to hear one another.

Re: [coreboot] Reminder: The maiing list vs forum poll closes in just under 24 hours.

that's easy to work with. Would that work for you? Martin On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:03 AM, taii...@gmx.com <taii...@gmx.com> wrote: > On 03/03/2017 01:45 AM, Martin Roth wrote: > > As brought up in the previous coreboot community meeting, the coreboot >> project >

Re: [coreboot] Reminder: The maiing list vs forum poll closes in just under 24 hours.

sking for too much, don't I? ;-) > > (anyway, it is too late) > > Zoran > ___ > > On 3/3/17, Martin Roth <gauml...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As brought up in the previous coreboot community meeting, the coreboot > > project > > is discussing the idea of

[coreboot] Reminder: The maiing list vs forum poll closes in just under 24 hours.

As brought up in the previous coreboot community meeting, the coreboot project is discussing the idea of switching from the mailing list to a forum. This idea did not originate with the coreboot leadership, but from a request by members of the community. I know many people have some strong

[coreboot] coreboot community meeting minutes for March 2, 2017

Here are the meeting minutes of today's coreboot community meeting. Info about the next meeting (March 16) is at the bottom. ## # Thursday, March 2nd, 2017 General coreboot news & discussions * coreboot was not accepted for GSoC

Re: [coreboot] Crowdfunding Status for KGPE-D16 BMC Port Offer

ere: >> >> https://www.raptorengineering.com/coreboot/kgpe-d16-bmc-port-offer.php >> >> If you would like to see this happen, please contact Martin Roth at >> gauml...@gmail.com to make a pledge to this community-driven >> crowdfunding campaign. >> >> Thanks

[coreboot] Mailing List vs Forum poll

As brought up in the last coreboot community meeting, the coreboot project is discussing the idea of switching from the mailing list to a forum. This idea did not originate with the coreboot leadership, but from a request by members of the community. I know many people have some strong feelings

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Always include coreboot banner in console independent of log level

that on > some platforms even LOG_ERROR spews uninteresting spam right now, but we > should probably consider that a bug with the code that does so instead.) > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Martin Roth <gauml...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Paul, >> I agree

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Always include coreboot banner in console independent of log level

Hi Paul, I agree that it seems reasonable to always print the banner to the console. My recommendation is that we don't even add it as an option. If there's a console set up, write the banner to it. As I recall from Sage's version of coreboot, they made this same change, and printed it at

Re: [coreboot] QA: Properly relay results of `checkpatch.pl` check

Hi Paul, checkpatch is currently not a gating item in jenkins and should always pass right now. The checkpatch build was added to jenkins to allow people to see at the results of the console output for the patch without having to download and run checkpatch themselves. Unfortunately,

Re: [coreboot] The fastest possible intel free-as-in-freedom pattform not supported now?

I believe that the only Xeon chips that are supported by coreboot are using the FSP. These are the Broadwell-DE (Xeon D family) & Ivy Bridge Gladden (E3-1125C / E3-1105C v2). Not that they're high power, but the C2000 (Rangeley/Avaton) chips also use the FSP, but don't have an ME. These are

Re: [coreboot] Libreboot X220 pre-order from Minifree - libre firmware preinstalled

Please, let's keep things calm and civil. There's no call for personal attacks of this nature. Let's not create drama. Thanks. Martin On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:24 PM, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > This is a product that doesn't exist yet and that may not ever exist at > all. > >

[coreboot] coreboot community meeting minutes for February 16, 2017

Here are the meeting minutes of today's coreboot community meeting. Info about the next meeting (March 2) is at the bottom. ## General coreboot news * coreboot is working on joining the Software Freedom Conservancy in a fiscal

[coreboot] 2017 North American coreboot Conference

We are happy to announce that the 2017 North American coreboot Conference will be held in Denver, Colorado on June 5th & 6th, with an optional hacking day on June 7th. Register here: https://goo.gl/o2j4gX The cost will be $250 for corporate attendees, $100 for individuals, and $25 for

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot binary for ASUS F2A85-M

I'm not really sure what's going on, and without a debug console, it's kind of hard to tell. Here are some random thoughts to give you ideas for what you might want to try next: Does the system boot up otherwise? Is it possible to ssh into it to get the log out with the cbmem utility? That

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot binary for ASUS F2A85-M

Using your ROM, I'm getting USB keyboard in both grub and linux. You might try setting SeaBIOS's usb-time-sigatt to something higher than 100: https://www.seabios.org/Runtime_config "The USB2 specification requires devices to signal that they are attached within 100ms of the USB port being

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot binary for ASUS F2A85-M

Hi Maxim, Try this: Remove all of the memory in the board except for one DIMM in the slot furthest away from the processor. AGESA on this chip has a requirement (that some vendors apparently worked around) that DIMMs be populated from the furthest slot to the closest. It looks like the code

Re: [coreboot] Quad core CPU overheat?

Hey, I have this problem even on my W530 and W541 systems with the vendor BIOS, so I don't think this is really coreboot related. I've taken two steps to fix it : 1) I use thinkfan to max out the fan speed early and keep it there longer. 2) I limit the processor speed to its maximum normal speed

Re: [coreboot] Flash ROM access during boot

Adding onto what others have said: The additional accesses you're seeing are the cbfs searches for additional ROMS and configuration data. I don't think that it would save much time if we cached the cbfs locations and filenames, but it's possible that it might save a very small amount. I doubt

Re: [coreboot] Fund a TALOS Secure Workstation as coreboot build system

Hey Merlin, I was taking and keeping track of the pledges for Talos, so I'd be happy to continue. Martin On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Merlin Büge wrote: > Everyone, > > >> We would like to see $20k USD from the community; we'll match (and >> actually slightly exceed)

Re: [coreboot] Fund a TALOS Secure Workstation as coreboot build system

what happens with that. Martin On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Martin Roth <gauml...@gmail.com> wrote: > Update: > I've added coreboot's commitment to purchase a board and a processor > to the crowdsupply site. > > Board: 3700 > Processor: 1240 > > We've got $6,200

[coreboot] New toolchain coming - Please test your boards with it

coreboot intends to update our toolchain soon, and we'd like to get it thoroughly tested before we do, so we need everyone's help. Please download the toolchain patch, build the new toolchain, then build and test any boards you're working on with it. You can either reply to this thread with your

Re: [coreboot] Fund a TALOS Secure Workstation as coreboot build system

processor. Thanks to everyone who committed to supporting the purchase. Martin On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Martin Roth <gauml...@gmail.com> wrote: > Update: > We've got $4400 promised, with 7 contributors. > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Martin Roth <gauml...@gmail.com

Re: [coreboot] using overlayfs to have several coreboot dev envs

I've been working on adding configs (miniconfigs) for abuild as well. The plan is to have a coreboot/configs directory with all of the configs there. Two alternatives that were discussed were coreboot/configs/VENDOR/MAINBOARD and just putting the configs in the existing

[coreboot] Gerrit cleanup: Abandoning patches older than 18 months

I've just completed another round of gerrit cleanup, abandoning a bunch of patches that are older than 18 months. Here's a link to what was just abandoned: https://review.coreboot.org/#/q/status:abandoned+comment:%22Cleanup:+Abandoning+patches%22 I plan to do this again in another month,

Re: [coreboot] Fund a TALOS Secure Workstation as coreboot build system

Update: We've got $4400 promised, with 7 contributors. On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Martin Roth <gauml...@gmail.com> wrote: > Update: > After the weekend, we're up to $3700 with 5 contributors. > > Martin > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 1:01 PM, David Hendricks &l

Re: [coreboot] Fund a TALOS Secure Workstation as coreboot build system

one ? > > > Thanks > > > Pierre > -- > *From:* coreboot <coreboot-boun...@coreboot.org> on behalf of Martin Roth > <gauml...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, November 7, 2016 10:22:26 PM > *To:* David Hendricks > *Cc:* Paul Menzel; co

Re: [coreboot] Fund a TALOS Secure Workstation as coreboot build system

Update: After the weekend, we're up to $3700 with 5 contributors. Martin On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 1:01 PM, David Hendricks <david.hendri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Martin Roth <gauml...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is getting a Talos

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Finding a conference call solution for the CCC

gle Hangouts? It's got a web interface and native clients for > Android and iOS. (I'm not sure if you still need a binary plug-in for > Firefox, but at least Chromium can run it natively via WebRTC.) > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Martin Roth <gauml...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Finding a conference call solution for the CCC

We were thinking of switching to the mumble server that Chris Ching has set up, but it doesn't seem to have any web client or way to work around that. After looking at a number of solutions, I think the solution we'd like to try at this point is Blue Jeans - bluejeans.com. It's actually a paid

Re: [coreboot] Fund a TALOS Secure Workstation as coreboot build system

Is getting a Talos workstation as a build server something that people are interested in contributing money for? So far, we've got $2500 pledged from two contributors out of the $7500 needed to get a server. Please email me privately with your contributions, unless you really want to make it

Re: [coreboot] Microcode.bin question ?

Hi Riko, Make sure you have "Allow use of binary-only repository" (CONFIG_USE_BLOBS) selected in kconfig. This is disabled by default for people who don't want any blobs in their builds. I've verified that the file exists in that location. Martin On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Riko Ho

<    1   2   3   4   >