On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 02:25:19PM +0100, Leah Rowe wrote:
> If you've got a D16 to submit reports on, that'd also be great.
I just pushed one on the D16.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
GPG Key: 25F774AB
Do you use free software? Donate to join the FSF and support freedom at
known issue?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
GPG Key: 25F774AB
Do you use free software? Donate to join the FSF and support freedom at
http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=859
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
; My 4.6.3 Xen tree is hacked up right now with stuff copied from old
> versions of the tree, so I'll clean it up and see if they are interested
> in accepting patches.
Oh, wow, thank you! Sorry that I didn't spend time tracking that down
properly back in 2008. I'd be intereste
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:46:29PM +0100, The Gluglug wrote:
> You should crowd-fund the $35,000 figure, there are lots of people who
> will be interested in this. I personally will chip in, and I'd ask
> others to as well.
I would chip in too.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
GPG
I tested those on the Asus F2A85-M/CSM board.
You can also omit the optional xhci blob (no usb3 support) as well as the VGA
BIOS.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
GPG Key: 25F774AB
Do you use free software? Donate to join the FSF and support freedom at
http://www.fsf.org/register_f
oard entirely (and let it sit a few seconds to
allow the caps to drain) when switching between proprietary bios and
coreboot.
For me this port works out of the box with the default settings. If you like
I can send you a link to a known-good image that we use here, so that you can
verify your hard
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:18:46AM -0400, Ward Vandewege wrote:
> However, hd/strings suggest that the AGESA version is v1.1.0.7:
>
> 206209:007acd40 00 00 00 00 30 30 30 30 41 47 45 53 41 00 00 00
> |AGESA...|
> 206210-007acd50 56 31 2e 31 2e 30 2e 37 20 20 20
00 30 30 30 30 41 47 45 53 41 00 00 00
|AGESA...|
206210-007acd50 56 31 2e 31 2e 30 2e 37 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 00 |V1.1.0.7
|
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege | CTO, Free Software Foundation
GPG Key: 25F774AB | http://status.fsf.org/ward
http://fsf.org/blogs/RSS
speed issue with AGESA
1.0.3.
Anyone else interested in working on a port of H8DGi-F or a similar board?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege | CTO, Free Software Foundation
GPG Key: 25F774AB | http://identi.ca/cure | http://fsf.org/blogs/RSS
Do you use free software? Donate to join the FSF and su
; Thanks,
> >
> > Paul
>
> I have the same problem
This is now fixed.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege | CTO, Free Software Foundation
GPG Key: 25F774AB | http://identi.ca/cure | http://fsf.org/blogs/RSS
Do you use free software? Donate to join the FSF and support freedom a
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:29:01PM +0100, Xavi Drudis Ferran wrote:
> For now secure boot only restricts what we boot (and the booted OS restricts
> the rest
> of what we run). But in the end the purpuse is to stablish a DRM scheme so
> that
> if a server can't prove that we're running software
visions from the old SVN tree; you can grep the git log for the
svn revision number (it is listed); you'll see these are revisions from 2006.
I do have an s2881 that I booted succesfully about 5 or 6 weeks ago, with
coreboot head. It's a very similar board.
Have you tried with less ram?
ate lists. I hope you all agree.
I very much agree.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege | CTO, Free Software Foundation
GPG Key: 25F774AB | http://identi.ca/cure | http://fsf.org/blogs/RSS
Do you use free software? Donate to join the FSF and support freedom at
http://www.fsf.org/register_
t; Two; I have two identical M-Audio Delta 1010s.
Finding a modern board with two 'old' PCI slots may be difficult, regardless
of coreboot... Have you seen any at all?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege | CTO, Free Software Foundation
GPG Key: 25F774AB | http://identi.ca/cure | http://fs
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:19:41PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> I'd prefer if they were on a separate email list.
Me, too.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege | CTO, Free Software Foundation
GPG Key: 25F774AB | http://identi.ca/cure | http://fsf.org/blogs/RSS
Do you use free sof
ou bring too much hardware, but we've never had any (real)
> trouble with that approach when trying this in Brussels, Denver or
> Hamburg. :-)
Well, in Hamburg they were a bit upset about this after about three
consecutive evenings of hacking in the hotel lobby. Ah, well.
Thanks,
War
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 08:16:10AM +0100, Rudolf Marek wrote:
> Would someone be interrested if I write something about microcoded
> CPUs controllers? Like the classic uCode ROM + ALU + Regs + IO unit?
Please go for it!
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: co
if around the call. Those
> files are
> src/cpu/amd/model_10xxx/init-cpus.c
> src/mainboard/*/*/romstage.c
> (and by */* I mean all or some of the fam 10 boards, not all boards).
This is the option that Stepan and Peter prefer, so this seems like the best
way forward? I'd test a
Hi Xavi,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:45:02PM +0100, Xavi Drudis Ferran wrote:
> Should I send a patch making a Kconfig option to not upgrade microcode for
> fam10? Is there any interest in that ?
Yes, please. I would test and ack that.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free So
appear to be used anywhere
but in the checks in h3finit.c.
What's the best way to fix this?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 11:01:41PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Ward Vandewege wrote:
> > See attached. Perhaps we should also print a post code if the SMBus
> > controller can't be found - suggestions for a value?
>
> 0x5B ?
Let's do that as part of the die modific
lable:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH&Description=ddr3+quad+rank&x=0&y=0
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
hat is that it would clobber
any previous post codes, which might be a better indicator for what's going
wrong.
Perhaps a good way to deal with fatal runtime error conditions would be
a) set a unique post code
b) call die
in the assumption that die does not clobber the post code.
What
See attached. Perhaps we should also print a post code if the SMBus
controller can't be found - suggestions for a value?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
We can't print this early.
This patch fixes a hang on
superm
ng
the short.
See
http://www.coreboot.org/GIGABYTE_GA-MA785GMT-UD2H
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
ain bios).
> signed-off-by Wang Qing Pei
Thank you! I have a few of these boards arriving next week and will be
testing this.
Thanks!
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
gt; > http://ward.vandewege.net/coreboot/s2881/20100621-myles/
>
> Thanks for testing Ward! As far as I can see, both worked, but 1+2+3+4 is
> cleaner. It doesn't look like there is an ADM1027 on your board.
>
> Is there something missing before an Ack & commit
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 07:36:39AM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Myles Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Ward Vandewege wrote:
> >> Hi Myles,
> >>
> >> Everything seems fine with either patch - but there a
r why the temperature values look right in all cases. Does it
> need to be cold booted in order for the initialization to be needed?
All boots were cold.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
changeset), r5635 + patch 1 and r5635 + patch 2.
Let me know if you need anything else...
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
Ward?
Yep, I've got (the guts) of an s2881 lying on my desk here, and can test any
patches you throw at me :)
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
gt;
> Another data point: It _does_ continue after the hang, but it takes about
> an hour.
Oh! That's interesting. I never tried to leave the board alone for that long.
> I image each memory write is timing out so a bunch of writes via
> memset drags the total timeout to an hour
i-dev
since Intrepid, and they dropped the virtual pciutils-dev package that refers
to libpci-dev in Lucid.
I've put a note to that effect on the wiki, too.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
0x13d00 stage 43730
> > fallback/payload 0x1e840 payload 34069
> > pci1002,515e.rom 0x26dc0 optionrom 45056
>
> > pci8086,1076.rom 0x31e00 unknown 72704
> Doesn't this need to be of type opti
rom image, or loaded via gpxe or some other means.
I can't imagine the use case where you would *not* want to have the mode set
to make the drive bootable. Unless there is some downside to doing so that
I'm totally missing?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Founda
Acked-by: Ward Vandewege
Thanks!
Ward.
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 12:33:50AM +0200, Rudolf Marek wrote:
> The sil3114 chip has a class code set to something else then IDE by strap
> resistor. It took me long time to figure out that this chip is otherwise IDE
> compatible ;)
>
> Tr
h are of the fam10 line, with a pair of model #
> CPUs, which are of the K8 line.
The port for that board was done on a pair of 2216 HE CPUs.
You may be hard pressed to find those for sale these days...
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administr
m10. I think it would be more fruitful for you to look at one of the
> boards that has both fam10 and k8 support, and try to put together an
> h8dme_fam10 port.
For the record, I've been trying to get that going for a while, but have not
had much success - very early hangs in the fam10
nux
kernel anymore.
There appear to be public datasheets for Sil3114, referenced here
https://ata.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Sata_sil
And the kernel driver also knows how to bring it up, since using a linux
kernel as a payload has worked for me in the past.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
s? And the hardware is identical?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
t; >
> since this is a C file that is included in exactly one file,
> "raminit_f.c" you could as well just mark the function "static".
Done.
> btw, for function prototypes the extern in not really needed. I keep
> removing them from the tree, but if people thi
If there are better ways to kill the warnings, please let me know!
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
This fixes a number of warnings when building m57sli (and other boards with mcp55).
This patch is boot tested on m57sli.
What appears to
and
> not rv610. I just added the ID and it does work it seems.
But that Gigabyte board is DDR3 - didn't Zheng say that was not supported
with fam10 CPUs yet?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
Join us in Cambridge for LibrePlane
oggle between
your 2 chips. If the second one has a good image, this should work.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
Join us in Cambridge for LibrePlanet, March 19th-21st!
http://groups.fsf.org/wiki/LibrePlanet2010
--
coreboot mailing
ones :)
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
Join us in Cambridge for LibrePlanet, March 19th-21st!
http://groups.fsf.org/wiki/LibrePlanet2010
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
ase
docs (and code?) for the SR56x0/SP5100 chipset. With that, supporting any of
the boards listed above might be possible. This chipset is likely to be
around for a while (5 years?).
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
arious brands, so far I like
Raritan's Dominion series the best). That works, 100% of the time.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:14:30AM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> On 23.02.2010 21:14, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > Ward Vandewege wrote:
> >
> >> The automatic testing framework Stepan built a few years ago - I'd
> >> love to get a few boards set
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:47:21AM -0700, Myles Watson wrote:
> > Could we have some tag to svn commit like:
>
> > And then add:
> >
> > current->works
> And also the "haha this is broken" tag and maybe the "will fry your
> mainboard" tag. :)
>
> One problem is that commits that are board-specif
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:00:25PM +0100, Patrick Georgi wrote:
> Am 03.02.2010 18:50, schrieb Ward Vandewege:
> > This fixes breakage introduced in r5051.
> Sorry for that. I assumed newconfig would be fine:
>
> (Options.lb)
> #make the SB HT chain on bus 0, default
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:52:57PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> On 2/3/10 6:50 PM, Ward Vandewege wrote:
> > This fixes breakage introduced in r5051.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ward.
> >
> >
> Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> Acked-by: Stefan
This fixes breakage introduced in r5051.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
Revision 5051 broke Kconfig booting for the Tyan s2881 board. Up to 5050, there
were two SB_HT_CHAIN_ON_BUS0 sections in the mainboard Kconfig file - one
setting
Hi all,
I thought I'd point out this little gem from the linux-poweredge list
http://lists.us.dell.com/pipermail/linux-poweredge/2010-January/041170.html
Apparently several lines of Dell servers have a BIOS setting called
"Cores-per-processor".
It seems they ship these machines with the set
to the list?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
y good:
0xf870
which is
1111
So the default link is 0, and the Routing Table Disable bit is set to zero.
You mentioned bit 11 - that seems to be marked as 'reserved' in the BKDG for
fam10?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Admi
FN(CONFIG_CDB, 0)); //0x00
OK - with that patch it builds and boots, and the output looks similar (but
not identical. See
http://ward.vandewege.net/coreboot/h8dme/fam10/minicom-20091222af-ram-on-both-cpus.cap
The only difference is this
-MMIO(b8)00-31a4f2, ->(0,1), , , CPU disab
gt; If inl and outl are hanging, I would dump the routing registers and read the
> device's IDs to see what's going wrong. I'm not very familiar with how the
> fam10 code works, but dumping the routing registers should be mostly cut and
> paste from the k8/util.c code.
Right
/mcp55/mcp55_early_setup_car.c
Log attached. Anything else I should try?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
minicom-20091222aa-all-ram-on-cpu1.cap
Description: application/cap
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/m
ment out that if/endif lines and have
CONFIG_LOGICAL_CPUS set to zero.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
se you're interested:
http://ward.vandewege.net/coreboot/h8dme/fam10/src-mainboard-supermicro-h8dme_fam10.tgz
http://ward.vandewege.net/coreboot/h8dme/fam10/targets-supermicro-h8dme_fam10.tgz
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot maili
solve this. Does that help?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
place. What's our current thinking on
that? I'd be happy to svn move them...
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
lar box is in production.
What toolchain are you using?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
do some more testing on this hardware, but it's in
production so that's a little hard right now. I'm going to work on a
supermicro h8dme fam10 port now, which is a very similar board, so hopefully
I'll be able to try the suggestions in this thread on that.
Thanks!
Ward.
--
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 03:29:05PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Ward Vandewege wrote:
> > Add supermicro h8dmr fam10 target. This is largely a mashup of the tyan
> > s2912
> > fam10 and h8dmr k8 targets.
> >
> > Many, many thanks to Marc, Myles, Patrick and Stepan
gt; $39 for those boards is pretty attractive, do you have a link?
> >
> http://www.pacificgeek.com/product.asp?id=847374
Argh, can not resist. Ordered :) Good for spare parts, too - I've still got a
couple of those out in the field...
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Found
sy to fix. If it is
> > below 0x1000 it is almost trivial.
>
> It's at 6000 something, and I don't like to. I would much prefer the
> driver not make assumptions for no da^Wreason.
I think the driver assumes
CS5536_BASE = 0x06100
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Va
up the
msr and then do the right thing, but it does not.
I think Peter Stuge may have a patch for the LED driver...
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/li
g this week, so I should be able to
test this in a couple days. Will do as soon as we get the hardware.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
on multiple cores, from my
> understanding.
Not to complicate matters even further, but since we are talking about
locking - will any of this improve the 'many cores talking to serial at once'
problem?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior
m-20090902-with-64G-samsung-on-cpu1-kingston-on-cpu2-after-533MHz-limit.cap
This is with all samsung ram on CPU1 and all kingston ram on CPU2, as you
suggested on irc.
Anything else I should try?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
c
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 04:12:21PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Bernie Innocenti
>
> Build fix: add a fallback for systems where tempfile is missing
Acked-by: Ward Vandewege
Committed in r271.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senio
he patch changes is
> 0x10efff. This value appears if the result of the cpuid call (or NB
> probe) is 0xff (the highest 8 bits aren't counted in, it might be
> 0x, too)'
I've seen this occasionally, too. I suspected compiler issues again...
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward V
> Do you want me to file a bug for this? Or is adding a cmdline option
> considered a good solution?
I think that should be considered a bug.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
nths or so ago iirc, but it highly depended on
the version I tried. I think, maybe, that 3.4 was working for me but I'm not
sure.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.o
4.
Also, are you sure your CONFIG_HT_* settings are correct? I found that
CONFIG_HT_CHAIN_UNITID_BASE really has to be 1 to get a bootable system with
mcp55 on fam10.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
coreboot mailing list: core
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 09:46:22AM +, Zheng Bao wrote:
> Oh, by the way, please add a 780 entry in the
> http://www.coreboot.org/Datasheets.
Done.
Many thanks!
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 10:26:38AM +0800, Bao, Zheng wrote:
> I am trying to port the ddr3 feature. I will submit a full patch to
> replace this one.
Sounds good, thanks. I won't be able to test until the end of August though,
but perhaps someone else can ack before then.
Thanks,
Ward
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 08:49:22PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:32:16PM -0400, Ward Vandewege wrote:
> > Hi Kevin et al,
> >
> > I just tried seabios head on my h8dmr fam10 system, and got rather odd
> > results - suddenly I am se
-gf.cap
OK:
http://ward.vandewege.net/coreboot/h8dmr/fam10/h8dmr-gg.cap
I'm not sure if this could be caused by seabios, or if perhaps it's yet
another toolchain problem. When reverting to the older seabios, the irq
problems went away again.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
corebo
witched back to gcc-3.4 (GCC) 3.4.6 (Ubuntu 3.4.6-8ubuntu2) on 32 bit,
and it's gone altogether, every time.
Is anyone else using gcc 4.3 (32 bit) to compile coreboot?
Thanks!
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
s what I am not doing or not doing correctly?
See
http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2009-June/049363.html
where Patrick explained how to convert a board to CBFS. I've used those
instructions with success before.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior
d go even slower.
>
> Sorry that's not much help, but I don't have a fam10 box to try things on.
Thanks - will see if I can try some of these things.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
size= 512MB: uncachable, count=1
Any thoughts on something else I should look at to debug this?
Thanks,
Ward.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 09:23:21PM -0400, Ward Vandewege wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on a fam10 tree for supermicro h8dmr. I'm using CBFS.
>
> It boots
md.com/documentation/guides/Pages/default.aspx
to the Fam10 revision guide is wrong, the correct link is
http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/41322.pdf
> The actual socket type
> should be read from CPUID_8001_EBX. Right?
I think so, according to the revision guide...
Thanks,
War
s public.
> 3. I haven't made coreboot go thoroughly on this RB-C2. This patch is
> just half tested.
>I am not confident it is 100% correct.
>
> Zheng
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao
With this patch, I can still boot my system with 00100F42h (RB-C2) CPUs -
Opteron
Rs - looking at the logs
it seems MTRRs are not set up until well after CBFS has dealt with
coreboot_ram.
This box has 32GB of ram, in case that makes a difference.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/m
e most certainly talking about Socket F. I have a few Opteron 2372 HE
CPUs that are 0x100F42.
> You can contact tim.per...@amd.com about the patch releasing.
Thank you, I have done so.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman
s/Processor_TechDocs/33610_PUB_Rev3%2042v3.pdf
> >
> > This patch takes its data from Table 9.
> >
> > Build tested.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ward Vandewege
>
> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer
r4434.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
d.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/33610_PUB_Rev3%2042v3.pdf
> >
> > This patch takes its data from Table 7.
> >
> > Build tested.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ward Vandewege
> >
> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer
r4433.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 05:07:31PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> Ward Vandewege wrote:
> > See attached...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ward.
> >
> >
> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer
r4432.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: cor
See attached...
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Bring S1g1 cpu names up to date with the official
Revision Guide for AMD NPT Family 0Fh Processors
Rev. 3.42 March 2009, found at
http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/33610_PUB_Rev3%2042v3.pdf
This patch takes its data from
See attached...
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Bring Socket F cpu names up to date with the official
Revision Guide for AMD NPT Family 0Fh Processors
Rev. 3.42 March 2009, found at
http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/33610_PUB_Rev3%2042v3.pdf
This patch takes its data
See attached...
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Bring AM2 cpu names up to date with the official
Revision Guide for AMD NPT Family 0Fh Processors
Rev. 3.42 March 2009, found at
http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/33610_PUB_Rev3%2042v3.pdf
This patch takes its data from
See attached. I'm not sure if I could predict the IDs for the
4050e/4450e/4850e - anyone know? I only have a 5050e.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
Add pretty name for AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5050e.
Boot tested.
S
ng up. I hope to get that ready soon so I can submit
the patch to the list.
>I am not confident it is 100% correct.
I'll test tonight or tomorrow and let you know how it goes.
Thanks!
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 05:07:23PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> any comments on this one?
> http://microcontrollershop.com/product_info.php?cPath=180&products_id=3406
Meh, requires Windows...
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
--
IG_ROM_SIZE is the total number of bytes allocated for coreboot use
## (normal AND fallback images and payloads). Leave 36k for VSA.
option CONFIG_ROM_SIZE = (512 * 1024) - (36 * 1024)
So, CONFIG_ROM_SIZE is the place to do that.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege
Free Software Foundation -
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:51:56PM -0400, Ward Vandewege wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 12:53:02AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > Ward Vandewege wrote:
> > > I'm trying to do a GPXE boot from seabios with coreboot on m57sli,
> > ..
> > > With 2.6.30, I g
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 12:53:02AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Ward Vandewege wrote:
> > I'm trying to do a GPXE boot from seabios with coreboot on m57sli,
> ..
> > With 2.6.30, I get absolutely nothing, the kernel just hangs
> > without output. That's with the m
1 - 100 of 394 matches
Mail list logo