Re: [coreboot] When does AMD release the fam15 spectre microcode updates?

2018-04-12 Thread taii...@gmx.com
AMD kept their promise. https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/hardware/amd-releases-spectre-v2-microcode-updates-for-cpus-going-back-to-2011/ 0xDF372A17.asc Description: application/pgp-keys -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

2018-04-12 Thread Zaolin
Hey Raymond, you can now start to ship coreboot with LinuxBoot easily https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/coreboot/+/23071/. Which gives you a whole Linux environment instead of TFTP. See www.linuxboot.org for more details. Regarding my work, I have implemented measured boot support into

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

2018-04-12 Thread ron minnich
At this point, on this platform, I think your fastest bet to mostly open sourcing it all is linuxboot. We recently had an experience where we installed a linux kernel in FLASH on two new boards in two days and most of that was just figuring out how to rearrange the UEFI bits, (i.e. move the

Re: [coreboot] When does AMD release the fam15 spectre microcode updates?

2018-04-12 Thread Mike Banon
> AMD kept their promise. Are you sure? I cannot find any download links except for the Windows 10. Yes, theoretically it should be possible to unpack those monstrous .cab files aimed for Win10 and extract a microcode hidden somewhere, but this is stupid. Do you have the download links for the

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

2018-04-12 Thread Peter Stuge
taii...@gmx.com wrote: > > 3. Support for Secure Boot - would one approach be simpler than another? > > SB was invented by MS for DRM, it serves no real security purpose IMO I'd like to ask you to reconsider that opinion. Secure Boot is mandated by Microsoft to provide Microsoft and

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

2018-04-12 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On 11 April 2018 at 16:39, Raymond Yeung wrote: > > I currently have a board that uses Intel Xeon D (previously codenamed > Broadwell DE). It boots up with BIOS/UEFI. I 'm exploring other oot-up > options here. > > > I'm not familiar with this early stage of system

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

2018-04-12 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
> Is it possible to go from BIOS/UEFI to UBOOT (on-board)? How? Actually, since you are using, after all, YOCTO Project to build your BDX-DE BSP, you can freely use U-Boot, if Bin Meng (U-Boot BSP maintainer) already integrated BDX-DE/Camelback CRB's FSP into U-Boot. If? Bin, Did you integrate

[coreboot] Re : Re: BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

2018-04-12 Thread echelon
- Mail d'origine - De: Peter Stuge À: coreboot@coreboot.org Envoyé: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 17:43:48 +0200 (CEST) Objet: Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT ... > Most people who buy computers are happy, because controlling the computer > isn't as important as using the desktop,

[coreboot] Re : Re: Re : Re: BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

2018-04-12 Thread echelon
It is the "IS FINE" that shocked (and saddened...) me - Mail d'origine - De: David Hendricks À: Florentin Demetrescu Cc: Peter Stuge , Coreboot Envoyé: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:09:54 +0200 (CEST) Objet: Re:

Re: [coreboot] Re : Re: BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

2018-04-12 Thread Timothy Pearson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Or Intel, or AMD, or Qualcomm, or Samsung, or Lenovo, or anyone else involved in the firmware stack really. It's a scary world out there these days! On 04/12/2018 04:18 PM, eche...@free.fr wrote: > > - Mail d'origine - > De: Peter Stuge

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

2018-04-12 Thread David Hendricks
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:18 PM, wrote: > > - Mail d'origine - > De: Peter Stuge > À: coreboot@coreboot.org > Envoyé: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 17:43:48 +0200 (CEST) > Objet: Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT > > ... > > Most people who buy computers are happy,

[coreboot] Re : Re: Re : Re: BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

2018-04-12 Thread echelon
But I respect the opinions of Peter.. Florentin - Mail d'origine - De: eche...@free.fr À: David Hendricks Cc: Peter Stuge , Coreboot Envoyé: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:18:00 +0200 (CEST) Objet: [coreboot] Re : Re: Re : Re:

Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT

2018-04-12 Thread taii...@gmx.com
On 04/12/2018 11:43 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: > taii...@gmx.com wrote: >>> 3. Support for Secure Boot - would one approach be simpler than another? >> SB was invented by MS for DRM, it serves no real security purpose IMO > I'd like to ask you to reconsider that opinion. > It is a fact not an

Re: [coreboot] When does AMD release the fam15 spectre microcode updates?

2018-04-12 Thread taii...@gmx.com
On 04/12/2018 09:06 AM, Mike Banon wrote: >> AMD kept their promise. > Are you sure? I cannot find any download links except for the Windows 10. > Yes, theoretically it should be possible to unpack those monstrous .cab files > aimed for Win10 and extract a microcode hidden somewhere, but this is