AMD kept their promise.
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/hardware/amd-releases-spectre-v2-microcode-updates-for-cpus-going-back-to-2011/
0xDF372A17.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
Hey Raymond,
you can now start to ship coreboot with LinuxBoot easily
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/coreboot/+/23071/.
Which gives you a whole Linux environment instead of TFTP. See
www.linuxboot.org for more details.
Regarding my work, I have implemented measured boot support into
At this point, on this platform, I think your fastest bet to mostly open
sourcing it all is linuxboot. We recently had an experience where we
installed a linux kernel in FLASH on two new boards in two days and most
of that was just figuring out how to rearrange the UEFI bits, (i.e. move
the
> AMD kept their promise.
Are you sure? I cannot find any download links except for the Windows 10.
Yes, theoretically it should be possible to unpack those monstrous .cab files
aimed for Win10 and extract a microcode hidden somewhere, but this is stupid.
Do you have the download links for the
taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> > 3. Support for Secure Boot - would one approach be simpler than another?
>
> SB was invented by MS for DRM, it serves no real security purpose IMO
I'd like to ask you to reconsider that opinion.
Secure Boot is mandated by Microsoft to provide Microsoft and
Hi,
On 11 April 2018 at 16:39, Raymond Yeung wrote:
>
> I currently have a board that uses Intel Xeon D (previously codenamed
> Broadwell DE). It boots up with BIOS/UEFI. I 'm exploring other oot-up
> options here.
>
>
> I'm not familiar with this early stage of system
> Is it possible to go from BIOS/UEFI to UBOOT (on-board)? How?
Actually, since you are using, after all, YOCTO Project to build your
BDX-DE BSP, you can freely use U-Boot, if Bin Meng (U-Boot BSP
maintainer) already integrated BDX-DE/Camelback CRB's FSP into U-Boot.
If?
Bin,
Did you integrate
- Mail d'origine -
De: Peter Stuge
À: coreboot@coreboot.org
Envoyé: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 17:43:48 +0200 (CEST)
Objet: Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT
...
> Most people who buy computers are happy, because controlling the computer
> isn't as important as using the desktop,
It is the "IS FINE" that shocked (and saddened...) me
- Mail d'origine -
De: David Hendricks
À: Florentin Demetrescu
Cc: Peter Stuge , Coreboot
Envoyé: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:09:54 +0200 (CEST)
Objet: Re:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Or Intel, or AMD, or Qualcomm, or Samsung, or Lenovo, or anyone else
involved in the firmware stack really. It's a scary world out there
these days!
On 04/12/2018 04:18 PM, eche...@free.fr wrote:
>
> - Mail d'origine -
> De: Peter Stuge
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:18 PM, wrote:
>
> - Mail d'origine -
> De: Peter Stuge
> À: coreboot@coreboot.org
> Envoyé: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 17:43:48 +0200 (CEST)
> Objet: Re: [coreboot] BIOS/CoreBoot/UBOOT
>
> ...
> > Most people who buy computers are happy,
But I respect the opinions of Peter..
Florentin
- Mail d'origine -
De: eche...@free.fr
À: David Hendricks
Cc: Peter Stuge , Coreboot
Envoyé: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:18:00 +0200 (CEST)
Objet: [coreboot] Re : Re: Re : Re:
On 04/12/2018 11:43 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> taii...@gmx.com wrote:
>>> 3. Support for Secure Boot - would one approach be simpler than another?
>> SB was invented by MS for DRM, it serves no real security purpose IMO
> I'd like to ask you to reconsider that opinion.
>
It is a fact not an
On 04/12/2018 09:06 AM, Mike Banon wrote:
>> AMD kept their promise.
> Are you sure? I cannot find any download links except for the Windows 10.
> Yes, theoretically it should be possible to unpack those monstrous .cab files
> aimed for Win10 and extract a microcode hidden somewhere, but this is
14 matches
Mail list logo