On 04/01/2017 05:24 AM, Nico Huber wrote:
> On 01.04.2017 00:49, Todd Weaver wrote:
>> On a related topic, but not related to vbios gfx; I met with
>> Matthew Garrett while at LibrePlanet, and he mentioned that we needn't
>> worry about graphics within coreboot or
On 04/01/2017 04:55 PM, Trammell Hudson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:43:40PM +, ron minnich wrote:
>> Annnd with the linux payload we're back to linuxbios :-)
> It was a good idea in 1999, and it is still a good idea.
We *may* party like it's 1999 in 2017 then...
>> For a payload c
On Sat, 2017-12-23 at 11:39 +0100, Nico Huber wrote:
> If you get the i.MX8 for it (and it turns out to be as good
> documented), all you have to do is to ask for a board with the most
> powerful version that physically fits a Librem 13 [1]. Then you can
> offer trustworthy hardware vs. performance
On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 22:06 -0500, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Timothy Pearson
> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for the detailed explanation. I guess this is an area in
> > which experience matters; it is absolutely unacceptable (and not
> > unexpected) that Intel misled y
On Sat, 2017-12-23 at 23:32 -0500, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> You will never have that type of leverage, if google can't pull it
> off then no one can.
There are a lot of assumptions you are making.
First off, having leverage doesn't only mean with Intel, it also means
with competitors or alternati
On Sun, 2017-12-24 at 01:30 -0500, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> I think people buying a TALOS 2 and people buying a Librem are two
> very distinct types of people. I very much doubt that someone has
> ever had to decide between buying a Librem and a TALOS.
I think this is correct as well.
> > > > > A
aking sure it is possible (a), a rough idea of how long (b), and
if we can hire somebody to develop it (c).
I appreciate any replies to any parts of the above, and I am hopeful
somebody would be able to have the time needed to get paid to get
coreboot onto this board.
Thank you!
Todd Weaver
Wonderful writeup Paul, thank you. see below…
On Aug 28, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Paul Wilcox-Baker wrote:
> Dear Todd,
>
>> It appears (from following the instructions) that I have a new board
>> with unsupported cpu, chipset, and superIO.
>
>> 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/
On Aug 28, 2014, at 10:36 AM, David Hubbard
wrote:
> > The truth here is that we NEED to have a blob-free version (libreboot), so
> > I have a lot of work ahead of me :)
>
> The reality is that Intel has no plans to release code for Xeon E3-1200 v3
> and HM86 Express. Coreboot's progress so fa
On Aug 28, 2014, at 10:59 AM, ron minnich wrote:
>> The truth here is that we NEED to have a blob-free version (libreboot), so I
>> have a lot of work ahead of me :)
>
> How much time and money for the RE effort did you have again? It needs
> to be a lot. Were I you I would not expect much help
On Aug 28, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Todd Weaver wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2014, at 10:59 AM, ron minnich wrote:
>>> The truth here is that we NEED to have a blob-free version (libreboot), so
>>> I have a lot of work ahead of me :)
>> If you NEED blob-free, you may need to go
On Aug 28, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
wrote:
> Am 28.08.2014 23:16 schrieb Todd Weaver:
>> On Aug 28, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Todd Weaver wrote:
>>> On Aug 28, 2014, at 10:59 AM, ron minnich wrote:
>>>>> The truth here is that we NEED to have a blob-fr
> Am 2014-08-28 23:38, schrieb Todd Weaver:
>> Comparing the blob-free versions from Intel (which are apparently
>> signed, so according to http://www.coreboot.org/Binary_situation are
>> at a 9000+ panic level), would it be possible to have blob-free
>> (probably
13 matches
Mail list logo
