On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 1:43 PM Pádraig Brady wrote:
> s/accepted/supports/ in NEWS
Thanks. Good catch.
I prefer to use "accepts", matching the entry just below.
Will push soon.
s/accepted/supports/ in NEWS
Otherwise good to push.
thanks!
Pádraig
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 5:00 AM Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 31/01/2023 06:48, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:29 AM Pádraig Brady wrote:
> >> ...
> >
> > Thanks for the speedy feedback.
> >
> >> "If must be followed by white space." comment has a typo
> >> and also not enforced
On 31/01/2023 06:48, Jim Meyering wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:29 AM Pádraig Brady wrote:
...
Thanks for the speedy feedback.
"If must be followed by white space." comment has a typo
and also not enforced explicitly, so could be removed.
Thanks. Removed.
valid_digits() may check
On 31/01/2023 06:07, Jim Meyering wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:17 AM Pádraig Brady wrote:
BTW I noted the following possible option when I recently refactored cksum:
--digest_format={int, hex, base64, binary}
/* cksum output formats:
int (sum, and cksum default),
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:29 AM Pádraig Brady wrote:
> ...
Thanks for the speedy feedback.
> "If must be followed by white space." comment has a typo
> and also not enforced explicitly, so could be removed.
Thanks. Removed.
> valid_digits() may check beyond the end of the buffer
> in the
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:17 AM Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 29/01/2023 20:40, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Hi Pádraig! Happy new year (belatedly ;-). Hope you're well.
> >
> > I'd like our generated announcements to be able to include
> > base64-encoded checksums without having to recommend verifying
On 30/01/2023 17:52, Jim Meyering wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 1:10 PM Jim Meyering wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jim Meyering wrote:
...
- I'm inclined to work like the openbsd cksum and accept invocations
like "cksum -a sha1x" and "cksum -a sha1b". Any objection?
Actually, I
On 29/01/2023 20:40, Jim Meyering wrote:
Hi Pádraig! Happy new year (belatedly ;-). Hope you're well.
I'd like our generated announcements to be able to include
base64-encoded checksums without having to recommend verifying them
using openbsd's cksum, so...
This is so the checksums are
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 1:10 PM Jim Meyering wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jim Meyering wrote:
> ...
> > - I'm inclined to work like the openbsd cksum and accept invocations
> > like "cksum -a sha1x" and "cksum -a sha1b". Any objection?
>
> Actually, I am now **disinclined** to
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jim Meyering wrote:
...
> - I'm inclined to work like the openbsd cksum and accept invocations
> like "cksum -a sha1x" and "cksum -a sha1b". Any objection?
Actually, I am now **disinclined** to implement this part. It'd make
sense only if we were able to compute
11 matches
Mail list logo
