Hi Pádraig! Happy new year (belatedly ;-). Hope you're well.
I'd like our generated announcements to be able to include
base64-encoded checksums without having to recommend verifying them
using openbsd's cksum, so...
I've begun writing the code to add --base64/-b support for GNU cksum,
prompted
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jim Meyering wrote:
...
> - I'm inclined to work like the openbsd cksum and accept invocations
> like "cksum -a sha1x" and "cksum -a sha1b". Any objection?
Actually, I am now **disinclined** to implement this part. It'd make
sense only if we were able to compute
On 2023-01-29 03:06, Kamil Dudka wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 11:01:45 PM CET Paul Eggert wrote:
On 2023-01-25 13:56, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
But it's not the same meaning. What I am trying to explain here is that
Cp -p (or cp --preserve=mode) also retains ACLs. This fact is not
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 11:04:22 PM CET Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 2023-01-29 03:06, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 11:01:45 PM CET Paul Eggert wrote:
> >> On 2023-01-25 13:56, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> >>> But it's not the same meaning. What I am trying to explain here is
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 11:01:45 PM CET Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 2023-01-25 13:56, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> > But it's not the same meaning. What I am trying to explain here is that
> >
> > Cp -p (or cp --preserve=mode) also retains ACLs. This fact is not obvious,
> > but yet it's
