Hello,
While trying to find out the first version with the 'seq' bug
(my previous email), I realized it has become quite hard to build
old coreutils version on newer glibc system.
In particular:
1. At some point 'gets' was removed from glibc, but old sources refer it.
2. Older gnulib used interna
Hello,
Prompted by the recent 'seq' thread, I spotted a bug in seq.
Fix attached.
I think it does not introduce any regressions, but review and comments
are very welcomed.
-assaf
>From 52505fe73fb00a30435009895d03fa3bba1297a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Assaf Gordon
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 17:0
2019-08-01 14:35:32 -0600, Assaf Gordon:
[...]
> FORMAT must be suitable for printing one argument of type 'double';
> it defaults to %.PRECf if FIRST, INCREMENT, and LAST are all fixed
> point decimal numbers with maximum precision PREC, and to %g
> otherwise.
>
> This makes it clear that
Hello,
On 2019-08-01 2:07 p.m., Peng Yu wrote:
I only find %.0f to print integers. But it is just a float with no
digits after the point. Is there a real integer format in seq? Thanks.
Please read the manual, or at least the "--help" screen:
$ seq --help
[...]
-f, --format=FORMAT
Hi,
I only find %.0f to print integers. But it is just a float with no
digits after the point. Is there a real integer format in seq? Thanks.
$ seq -f '%.0f minutes' 2563199 2563200
2563199 minutes
2563200 minutes
$ seq -f '%g minutes' 2563199 2563200
2.5632e+06 minutes
2.5632e+06 minutes
2.5632e
On 2019-07-31 20:36, Peng Yu wrote:
Hi,
Suppose that I know a md5sum that is derived one of the timestamps
computed below. Is there a way to quickly derive what the original
timestamp is? I could make a database of all the timestamps and their
md5sums. But as the total number of entries increase
Use unix time instead of md5sum
В Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:36:18 -0500
Peng Yu писал:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose that I know a md5sum that is derived one of the timestamps
> computed below. Is there a way to quickly derive what the original
> timestamp is? I could make a database of all the timestamps and th
2019-08-01 03:24:29 -0600, Assaf Gordon:
[...]
> > > I like this, and think it's useful functionality.
> > > It's equivalent to -f in date(1) on FreeBSD,
> > > so we should probably support that short option
> > [...]
> >
> > Note that busybox date has -D for that.
>
> In gnu date(1), -f is alrea
2019-08-01 02:08:59 -0600, Assaf Gordon:
[...]
> Three notes:
> 1.
> I would recommend using "-%7.0f minutes" format in "seq"
> instead of "%g", as the latter will result in a scientific notation
> for large values:
>
>$ seq -f '-%7g minutes' 2563200 | tail -n1
>-2.5632e+06 minutes
>
>
Hello,
Thank you for the review.
(replying to both emails together)
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:27:20PM +0100, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> 2019-07-31 14:59:42 +0100, Pádraig Brady:
> > On 26/07/19 08:29, Assaf Gordon wrote:
> [...]
> > > The first patch adds '--date-format=FORMAT', where FORMAT is
Hello,
On 2019-08-01 12:50 a.m., Stephane Chazelas wrote:
2019-07-31 22:36:18 -0500, Peng Yu:
Suppose that I know a md5sum that is derived one of the timestamps
computed below. Is there a way to quickly derive what the original
timestamp is? I could make a database of all the timestamps and t
11 matches
Mail list logo
