Re: [CoTyroneMailingList] Marriage Customs

2020-06-23 Thread Linda Nimer via CoTyroneList
What is YSTOR?
Linda  

On Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 03:11:42 PM PDT, Marion via CoTyroneList 
 wrote:  
 
 Elwyn
Thanks again for all your explanations and insight which have helped me 
understand this topic more clearly. The journals I mentioned cover similar 
topics to the book you described and I have been able to access them through 
YSTOR which is free at the moment. I have already downloaded ‘Bob was a 
Protestant horse’ onto my kindle and am looking forward to reading it. I always 
expect an interesting response to my queries from you and am never disappointed.

Ron
Thanks to you too for your perspective on illegitimacy and the way people tend 
to be supportive in these circumstances. Its strange that no one in my family 
knew that my grandfather was illegitimate till I started delving into the past!

I am grateful to everyone who has contributed to this discussion and really 
appreciate the forum the mailing list provides.
Regards Marion

Sent from Mail for Windows 10





___
CoTyroneList Mailing List
Mailing List Email Address: CoTyroneList@cotyroneireland.com
Change Your Preferences: 
http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com
Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY
  
___
CoTyroneList Mailing List
Mailing List Email Address: CoTyroneList@cotyroneireland.com
Change Your Preferences: 
http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com
Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY


Re: [CoTyroneMailingList] Marriage Customs

2020-06-23 Thread Gordon Wilkinson via CoTyroneList
I've just downloaded "Bob was a Protestant Horse" and I notice a few 
similarities to my early days:


 * It's set near Cookstown, just north of Dungannon where my ancestors
   came from (or is it 'from whence my ancestors came'? :)  )
 * There's a Wilkinson farm just up the road. That's my name, but not
   my farm. There are many Wilkinsons in that general area. Mine moved
   to Belfast in the late 19thC.
 * I too spent several summers, in the '40s up to 1948 when we
   emigrated, on family friend Robinson's Farm in Hillsborough, Co.
   Down, as a child. Dad was works manager of Patrick & Wilkinson, an
   agricultural machinery manufacturer in Belfast, and I'd often
   accompany him on trips where he'd try to sell tractors to farmers.
   Sometimes successfully, but draught horses were common then.
 * The farm's description brings back fond memories of those farming
   days. I do remember the cold mornings, running barefoot all the
   time, collecting eggs, keeping away from the geese, and harvesting
   time in the fields when the 'ladies' would ply us 'workers' with
   ploughmens lunches.

What a lovely whimsical story I have yet to read in full.

Gordon


On 24/06/2020 10:02 am, Gordon Wilkinson via CoTyroneList wrote:

Elwyn,

Don't for one moment think Handfasting is obsolete. My Irish cousin 
(of mature years) 'Handfasted' a few years ago in true Druid fashion 
to his 3rd wife. Although married in Oz they traveled to the UK to 
visit Liverpool relatives (from Armagh) and for their Handfasting. I 
have the video and it was a moving ceremony. Some of these Druid 
traditions still persist. In this case I think the Handfasting came 
after the marriage. ;-)


Gordon


On 24/06/2020 4:45 am, elwyn soutter via CoTyroneList wrote:

Peter,



I have come across “buckle the beggar” but not buckleberry.  It looks 
to be
a term that must have come to Ulster with the Scots, as many of our 
local
words did. I have never heard it used in Ulster but it seems as 
though it

was at one time because I can see a couple of references on the net.



In the Scottish National Dictionary it says: *buckle-beggar*,
*buckle-the-beggars*, “one who marries others in a clandestine and
disorderly manner” (Sc. 1808 Jam.)



It reminds me a little of another form of marriage known as 
“handfasting.”
This was particularly common in the Scottish Borders in the 1500s & 
early

1600s, where there were very few Priests or Ministers due to the whole
place being basically lawless. Such clerics as there were usually had to
have a peel tower (similar to a bawn in Ulster) to retreat to if 
attacked.

So it was hard to get a Priest or a Minister to marry you. Quoting from
Godfrey Watsons’ book ”The Border Reivers[1] <#_ftn1>” (publ 1974) p 
180:




  “..if a priest was perhaps available only once a year, a problem
inevitably arose for those who wished to get married out of season, 
as it

were. The answer was ‘handfasting.’ This was a custom whereby a couple
would live together till the book-a-bosom man could bless their 
union. The
arrangement was for a trial period of one year (unless the parson 
appeared

earlier), after which it became permanent. If, before then, one or other
wanted to bring the arrangement to an end, he or she must accept
responsibility for any children of the union, in which case they were 
still
regarded as legitimate. There is still in existence an old genealogy 
of the
Elliots of Lariston, which refers to “Simon of Benks who handfasted 
or took
for a trial a bastard daughter of the said Gibbie with the Golden 
Garters
on condition he should pay her a considerable tocher[2] <#_ftn2> in 
case he
was not pleased with her.” Normally handfasting required no dowry, 
and this

idea of making second hand goods more marriageable may well have been
restricted to the gentry, who appear to have handfasted in the same 
way as

anyone else.  John, Lord Maxwell, for instance was contracted thus to a
sister of the Earl of Angus.



Nobody in the Borders seems to have worried very much about children 
being
born out of wedlock, and there are countless examples of natural[3] 
<#_ftn3>

children figuring openly in men’s wills.”



Isn’t “Gibbie with the Golden Garters” a wonderful name?




___
CoTyroneList Mailing List
Mailing List Email Address: CoTyroneList@cotyroneireland.com
Change Your Preferences: 
http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com

Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY


--
_
Nereda & Gordon Wilkinson, Hyde Park, South Australia.
Web: www.ozemail.com.au/~neredon   Skype id: neredon
Emails: gordon.wilkin...@ozemail.com.aunereda.wilkin...@ozemail.com.au

___
CoTyroneList Mailing List
Mailing List Email Address: CoTyroneList@cotyroneireland.com
Change Your Preferences: 
http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com

Re: [CoTyroneMailingList] Marriage Customs

2020-06-23 Thread Gordon Wilkinson via CoTyroneList

Elwyn,

Don't for one moment think Handfasting is obsolete. My Irish cousin (of 
mature years) 'Handfasted' a few years ago in true Druid fashion to his 
3rd wife. Although married in Oz they traveled to the UK to visit 
Liverpool relatives (from Armagh) and for their Handfasting. I have the 
video and it was a moving ceremony. Some of these Druid traditions still 
persist. In this case I think the Handfasting came after the marriage. ;-)


Gordon


On 24/06/2020 4:45 am, elwyn soutter via CoTyroneList wrote:

Peter,



I have come across “buckle the beggar” but not buckleberry.  It looks to be
a term that must have come to Ulster with the Scots, as many of our local
words did. I have never heard it used in Ulster but it seems as though it
was at one time because I can see a couple of references on the net.



In the Scottish National Dictionary it says: *buckle-beggar*,
*buckle-the-beggars*, “one who marries others in a clandestine and
disorderly manner” (Sc. 1808 Jam.)



It reminds me a little of another form of marriage known as “handfasting.”
This was particularly common in the Scottish Borders in the 1500s & early
1600s, where there were very few Priests or Ministers due to the whole
place being basically lawless. Such clerics as there were usually had to
have a peel tower (similar to a bawn in Ulster) to retreat to if attacked.
So it was hard to get a Priest or a Minister to marry you. Quoting from
Godfrey Watsons’ book ”The Border Reivers[1] <#_ftn1>” (publ 1974) p 180:



  “..if a priest was perhaps available only once a year, a problem
inevitably arose for those who wished to get married out of season, as it
were. The answer was ‘handfasting.’ This was a custom whereby a couple
would live together till the book-a-bosom man could bless their union. The
arrangement was for a trial period of one year (unless the parson appeared
earlier), after which it became permanent. If, before then, one or other
wanted to bring the arrangement to an end, he or she must accept
responsibility for any children of the union, in which case they were still
regarded as legitimate. There is still in existence an old genealogy of the
Elliots of Lariston, which refers to “Simon of Benks who handfasted or took
for a trial a bastard daughter of the said Gibbie with the Golden Garters
on condition he should pay her a considerable tocher[2] <#_ftn2> in case he
was not pleased with her.” Normally handfasting required no dowry, and this
idea of making second hand goods more marriageable may well have been
restricted to the gentry, who appear to have handfasted in the same way as
anyone else.  John, Lord Maxwell, for instance was contracted thus to a
sister of the Earl of Angus.



Nobody in the Borders seems to have worried very much about children being
born out of wedlock, and there are countless examples of natural[3] <#_ftn3>
children figuring openly in men’s wills.”



Isn’t “Gibbie with the Golden Garters” a wonderful name?




___
CoTyroneList Mailing List
Mailing List Email Address: CoTyroneList@cotyroneireland.com
Change Your Preferences: 
http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com
Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY


Re: [CoTyroneMailingList] Marriage Customs

2020-06-23 Thread Marion via CoTyroneList
Elwyn
Thanks again for all your explanations and insight which have helped me 
understand this topic more clearly. The journals I mentioned cover similar 
topics to the book you described and I have been able to access them through 
YSTOR which is free at the moment. I have already downloaded ‘Bob was a 
Protestant horse’ onto my kindle and am looking forward to reading it. I always 
expect an interesting response to my queries from you and am never disappointed.

Ron
Thanks to you too for your perspective on illegitimacy and the way people tend 
to be supportive in these circumstances. Its strange that no one in my family 
knew that my grandfather was illegitimate till I started delving into the past!

I am grateful to everyone who has contributed to this discussion and really 
appreciate the forum the mailing list provides.
Regards Marion

Sent from Mail for Windows 10





___
CoTyroneList Mailing List
Mailing List Email Address: CoTyroneList@cotyroneireland.com
Change Your Preferences: 
http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com
Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY


Re: [CoTyroneMailingList] Marriage Customs

2020-06-23 Thread elwyn soutter via CoTyroneList
Peter,



I have come across “buckle the beggar” but not buckleberry.  It looks to be
a term that must have come to Ulster with the Scots, as many of our local
words did. I have never heard it used in Ulster but it seems as though it
was at one time because I can see a couple of references on the net.



In the Scottish National Dictionary it says: *buckle-beggar*,
*buckle-the-beggars*, “one who marries others in a clandestine and
disorderly manner” (Sc. 1808 Jam.)



It reminds me a little of another form of marriage known as “handfasting.”
This was particularly common in the Scottish Borders in the 1500s & early
1600s, where there were very few Priests or Ministers due to the whole
place being basically lawless. Such clerics as there were usually had to
have a peel tower (similar to a bawn in Ulster) to retreat to if attacked.
So it was hard to get a Priest or a Minister to marry you. Quoting from
Godfrey Watsons’ book ”The Border Reivers[1] <#_ftn1>” (publ 1974) p 180:



 “..if a priest was perhaps available only once a year, a problem
inevitably arose for those who wished to get married out of season, as it
were. The answer was ‘handfasting.’ This was a custom whereby a couple
would live together till the book-a-bosom man could bless their union. The
arrangement was for a trial period of one year (unless the parson appeared
earlier), after which it became permanent. If, before then, one or other
wanted to bring the arrangement to an end, he or she must accept
responsibility for any children of the union, in which case they were still
regarded as legitimate. There is still in existence an old genealogy of the
Elliots of Lariston, which refers to “Simon of Benks who handfasted or took
for a trial a bastard daughter of the said Gibbie with the Golden Garters
on condition he should pay her a considerable tocher[2] <#_ftn2> in case he
was not pleased with her.” Normally handfasting required no dowry, and this
idea of making second hand goods more marriageable may well have been
restricted to the gentry, who appear to have handfasted in the same way as
anyone else.  John, Lord Maxwell, for instance was contracted thus to a
sister of the Earl of Angus.



Nobody in the Borders seems to have worried very much about children being
born out of wedlock, and there are countless examples of natural[3] <#_ftn3>
children figuring openly in men’s wills.”



Isn’t “Gibbie with the Golden Garters” a wonderful name?





Elwyn

--

[1] <#_ftnref1> Reiver = thief (robber)

[2] <#_ftnref2> dowry

[3] <#_ftnref3> illegitimate

On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 13:39, Peter Sinclair 
wrote:

> I must thank Elwyn for his very interesting texts about marriage and
> children born out of wedlock (lovely term 'wedlock', with all it implies!).
> There is another term I have come across during my research into the
> Sinclair families in Cos. Armagh, Tyrone and Monaghan: 'buckle-the-beggar'
> or 'buckleberry' marriage. Apparently this was marrying after the birth of
> children and was accepted by the Presbyterian and Roman Catholic churches,
> but not by the Church of Ireland (presumably before 1845). If Elwyn has any
> more information about this I know I would be interested.
>
> Peter
>
>  please don't print this email unless you really need to
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CoTyroneList  On Behalf
> Of elwyn soutter via CoTyroneList
> Sent: 22 June 2020 22:49
> To: CoTyroneIreland.com Mailing List 
> Cc: elwyn soutter 
> Subject: Re: [CoTyroneMailingList] Marriage Customs
>
> Marion,
>
>
>
> Sorry you can’t find Connell’s book. It is fairly old (1950) and may not
> be on-line anywhere. I think I found a copy in the Linenhall Library in
> Belfast and photocopied a couple of dozen pages. The book looks at Ireland
> as a whole and I am not sure if every custom reported there was necessarily
> represented in Tyrone, and especially by Ulster-Scots, but it’s obviously a
> useful background on marriage practices in Ireland in general.
>
>
>
> There are detailed references to arranged marriages but it is also clear
> that many were not arranged. (Connell distinguishes between what he called
> arranged and customary marriages).  Not every bride had a dowry. And there
> were some that were perhaps half way between. “John Kerrigan, a Mayo
> farmer, told the Poor Inquiry Commission that: “It is not always the
> father’s fault that his children get married too soon; sometimes the father
> suffers more than the child. I was a comfortable man, and had 4 cows and a
> heifer, till my daughter got married, and played me a trick that a good
> many girls have done before: she ran off with a young man and, after a
> week’s sport, he sent her back without having married her. She never
> stopped at me, saying that he wouldn’t take her without a fortune, until I
> was forced to give her three of my cows, and money besides; moreover I had
> to pay the priest.’” (Page 56).
>
>
>
> My own view is that arranged marriages were 

Re: [CoTyroneMailingList] Marriage Customs

2020-06-23 Thread Peter Sinclair via CoTyroneList
I must thank Elwyn for his very interesting texts about marriage and children 
born out of wedlock (lovely term 'wedlock', with all it implies!). There is 
another term I have come across during my research into the Sinclair families 
in Cos. Armagh, Tyrone and Monaghan: 'buckle-the-beggar' or 'buckleberry' 
marriage. Apparently this was marrying after the birth of children and was 
accepted by the Presbyterian and Roman Catholic churches, but not by the Church 
of Ireland (presumably before 1845). If Elwyn has any more information about 
this I know I would be interested. 

Peter

 please don't print this email unless you really need to

-Original Message-
From: CoTyroneList  On Behalf Of 
elwyn soutter via CoTyroneList
Sent: 22 June 2020 22:49
To: CoTyroneIreland.com Mailing List 
Cc: elwyn soutter 
Subject: Re: [CoTyroneMailingList] Marriage Customs

Marion,



Sorry you can’t find Connell’s book. It is fairly old (1950) and may not be 
on-line anywhere. I think I found a copy in the Linenhall Library in Belfast 
and photocopied a couple of dozen pages. The book looks at Ireland as a whole 
and I am not sure if every custom reported there was necessarily represented in 
Tyrone, and especially by Ulster-Scots, but it’s obviously a useful background 
on marriage practices in Ireland in general.



There are detailed references to arranged marriages but it is also clear that 
many were not arranged. (Connell distinguishes between what he called arranged 
and customary marriages).  Not every bride had a dowry. And there were some 
that were perhaps half way between. “John Kerrigan, a Mayo farmer, told the 
Poor Inquiry Commission that: “It is not always the father’s fault that his 
children get married too soon; sometimes the father suffers more than the 
child. I was a comfortable man, and had 4 cows and a heifer, till my daughter 
got married, and played me a trick that a good many girls have done before: she 
ran off with a young man and, after a week’s sport, he sent her back without 
having married her. She never stopped at me, saying that he wouldn’t take her 
without a fortune, until I was forced to give her three of my cows, and money 
besides; moreover I had to pay the priest.’” (Page 56).



My own view is that arranged marriages were mostly linked to retaining 
property, and so were of great relevance to farmers but largely irrelevant to 
labourers and others with few assets (ie the greater part of the population).



What you say about your Urney relatives marrying other local farmers was I 
think fairly common.  Until the arrival of the bicycle in rural Ireland in the 
1860s most travel, and consequently most courtship, was done on foot.
Whilst they were much fitter than most of us today, and could easily travel
15 or 20 miles a day, at the same time they were needed on the farm most of the 
time and so courting someone who lived say 30 miles away was almost impossible 
(save for folk whose occupations involved a bit of travel eg soldiers, 
policemen, stonemasons etc). My wife comes from Co. Fermanagh.
Her ancestors all married locally and in a history of her parish (Galloon) a 
local author said that that in the 1800s it was normal to marry within an “an 
asses bark of where you lived.” I suppose an asses bark can be heard for about 
half a mile or so. So you often married someone close to you. The girl next 
door perhaps?  Just as today, family pressures in many households would be to 
marry someone deemed suitable. So a farmer would want his children to marry 
another farmer’s children and not a labourer’s. A Church of Ireland – 
Presbyterian marriage wouldn't raise any eyebrows. A Church of Ireland – RC 
marriage could do so. Some couples just ignored the difficulties. For others it 
was a factor in their decision to emigrate.



In the 1800s there wasn’t a lot of subdivision of farms. They were mostly 
pretty small and just wouldn’t be viable if divided out amongst several sons, 
generation after generation.  So the farm usually went to the eldest son, and 
the other sons were expected to make their own way in the world.
(Some did stay as labourers on bigger farms but many had to leave. There was 
often no other work for them locally). The daughters were hopefully going to be 
disposed of by marriage with perhaps one – often the youngest – being retained 
to look after her parents in their old age (lucky her). See
*Note* below.



I have touched on Ireland’s problems in the 1800s. There were many. (One wit 
has said that Ireland has too much history and should be given a break.). Most 
contributed to emigration. I mentioned previously the massive population 
explosion between 1741 and 1841. In addition, Ireland has very few natural 
resources (no oil, coal, iron ore etc) and so did not benefit from the 
industrial revolution in the 1800s, the way Scotland, England, the US, Canada & 
Australia did, which created hundreds of thousands of comparatively well-paid 
new jobs in new