On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:07:54AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Johannes Erdfelt writes:
>
> > I had been thinking about writing an ICAP server for courier in my
>
> You mean ACAP, or ICAL?
I think he means ICAP. From a quick look ACAP doesn't propose to treat a
calendar as client config
Johannes Erdfelt writes:
> I had been thinking about writing an ICAP server for courier in my
You mean ACAP, or ICAL?
> copious spare time. But as the lack of any code shows, that isn't very
> often as of late :)
Well, whether it's ACAP or ICAL, my initial impression is that either one is
a
Peter C. Norton writes:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 11:45:35PM -0500, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
>> Integrating calendering with outlook isn't as easy as integrating mail
>> with outlook because of the lack of a standard network protocol like
>> IMAP however.
>
> There is a standard: icalendar. It'
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001, Juha Saarinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> > While I'm sure there will be a significant number of people who would
> > use the web version, most people will probably prefer using a client
> > such as outlook.
>
> Hmmm... I do
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 11:45:35PM -0500, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> Integrating calendering with outlook isn't as easy as integrating mail
> with outlook because of the lack of a standard network protocol like
> IMAP however.
There is a standard: icalendar. It's kind of a bear. Sam has said on
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> While I'm sure there will be a significant number of people who would
> use the web version, most people will probably prefer using a client
> such as outlook.
Hmmm... I don't know about that. Outlook sucks as an IMAP client,
especially if you ha
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001, Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter C. Norton writes:
>
> > Ditto. Webmail+calendering isn't as attractive as group calendering by
> > itself.
>
> It's probably a force-of-habit thing. If you take someone who's never used
> a calendar before, and they get
Peter C. Norton writes:
> Ditto. Webmail+calendering isn't as attractive as group calendering by
> itself.
It's probably a force-of-habit thing. If you take someone who's never used
a calendar before, and they get used to opening and updating their calendar
from any browser anywhere in the
David M . Stowell writes:
> Point. :) I've attached the courierd and authdaemonrc files. Is there
> anything else I should be examining at this point?
authdaemonrc indicates that you've installed all three LDAP, MySQL, and
PostgreSQL authentication drivers. I suspect that none of them are pr
On 2001.12.29 19:03 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, David M . Stowell wrote:
>
> > On 2001.12.29 09:22 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > > David M . Stowell writes:
> > >> When I run the perftest1 test during installation, all the
> messages I send are being
> > >> returned with the above
Ditto. Webmail+calendering isn't as attractive as group calendering by
itself.
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 01:24:43PM -0800, Sysop wrote:
> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> > Download: http://www.courier-mta.org/download.php
> > Fixes memory corruption in groupware calendaring. I found this one,
> > wh
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 02:12:39AM +, Michael Carmack wrote:
>
> Late reply, but the problem here _might_ be the way you're logging in.
> If you have a user named 'test' in your userdb or a user named 'test'
> listed in the 'aliases' file, and you log in under user 'test', you
> will log in
smoerk writes:
> i really tried to get a virtual domain configured, but i gave up. maybe
> i'm too stupid...
>
> - i put "example.com" in hosteddomains
> - i put "@example.com: user" in aliases/virtual
>> 513 relaying denied
The same domain cannot appear both in aliases and hosteddomains.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:52:20PM -0600, Jonathan Hall wrote:
> I've set up a test machine with two IP addresses, each resolving to a
> different hostname:
>
> host1.domain.com= 123.123.123.1
> host2.domain.com= 123.123.123.2
>
> I have configured postfix to successf
smoerk writes:
> - i put "example.com" in hosteddomains
> - i put "@example.com: user" in aliases/virtual
>> 513 relaying denied
> some mails from the mailing list archive says that i should put
> example.com also in esmtpacceptmailfor, but this also does not work
Yes, make all these changes.
i really tried to get a virtual domain configured, but i gave up. maybe
i'm too stupid...
- i put "example.com" in hosteddomains
- i put "@example.com: user" in aliases/virtual
> 513 relaying denied
some mails from the mailing list archive says that i should put
example.com also in esmtpacceptm
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Download: http://www.courier-mta.org/download.php
> Fixes memory corruption in groupware calendaring. I found this one,
> which means that there aren't too many people who are checking out the
> groupware calendaring mode. So, I'll just sit on the code for a
> little
Download: http://www.courier-mta.org/download.php
Fixes memory corruption in groupware calendaring. I found this one, which
means that there aren't too many people who are checking out the groupware
calendaring mode. So, I'll just sit on the code for a little while longer.
--
Sam
--Nick Riemondi wrote on 30.12.2001 11:35 -0600:
> Two quick questions,
> 1) I've noticed the server bounces mail bases on case sensitivity, ie. a
> message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will fail even though there is a valid user
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I force it to lowercase all addresses before
>
Nick Riemondi writes:
> Two quick questions,
> 1) I've noticed the server bounces mail bases on case sensitivity, ie. a
> message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will fail even though there is a valid user
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I force it to lowercase all addresses before
> checking them?
See locall
Two quick questions,
1) I've noticed the server bounces mail bases on case sensitivity, ie. a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will fail even though there is a valid user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I force it to lowercase all addresses before
checking them?
2) Is there any way to make the server send
--Mike Baker wrote on 30.12.2001 08:52 +:
> Does anyone have a way of accurately logging the bytes transferred by
> courier-imap to a particular user? If courier-imap itself cannot log this
> information, any suggestions of alternative methods of how to do this would
> be appreciated. I'm su
Hello,I'm
new to this list so first of all a great hello to everybody, followed bymy
first question.I compilied and installed courier-imap from sources. (without
any options toconfigure or any other script).Quoted from the
README:authpam - configure attempts to detect if the PAM library is
Does anyone have a way of accurately logging the bytes transferred by
courier-imap to a particular user? If courier-imap itself cannot log this
information, any suggestions of alternative methods of how to do this would
be appreciated.
I'm surprised i cannot find any information on this. That
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 08:18:08AM +, Michael Carmack wrote:
>
> IMAP doesn't seem to be working...IMAP starts up fine, I can telnet
> to port 143, but...apparently the server breaks the connection.
> There isn't much being output to the logs; here's the result of an
> attempt:
>
> Dec 28 07
25 matches
Mail list logo