On Sat, 24 May 2014 22:52:49 -0400
Mingyi Zhao rvl...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. The compilation now succeeded! Thank you!
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Sam Varshavchik
mr...@courier-mta.comwrote:
Mingyi Zhao writes:
During compilation, I got the following error:
clang++
On 25/05/14 11:04, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Leaving off MAXPERC should not be a factor. It defaults to, internally,
to MAXDAEMONS – effectively a no-op.
Right, thanks.
I presume that you've eliminated the low hanging fruit of actually reaching
the maximum number of connections.
Yes, barely
On Sun 25/May/2014 02:55:45 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Lindsay Haisley writes:
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 09:00 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
kb2...@kb2ear.net writes:
With the recent DMARC implementation from AOL and Yahoo I
have a very broken mailing list. Is there any way using MLM
to
In the .courier-list file you could put something that adds or replaces the
Reply-To: header. Then, use the headerdel and headeradd configuration
settings, as documented in the couriermlm man page, to remove the existing
From: header, and replace it with a new one.
But, after doing that,
Mark Constable writes:
That is not the case in this situation. Here's a imap log dump from
Thunderbird
in case something is obvious... at the point below I clicked on my Junk
folder...
1759508352[7fa967a50370]: proposed url = INBOX.Junk folder for connection
INBOX has To Wait = FALSE can
On 26/05/14 00:00, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Need to set IMAPDEBUGFILE on the server side, and collect the actual
IMAP traffic.
Got it, thanks, doing that now.
Even better yet would be to find the server process, and strace it.
It'll be tricky to find the right imapd process to attach to but I
On 26/05/14 00:00, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Or, turn off IMAPENHANCEDIDLE, to see if that makes a difference.
Ah right, I see, it's IMAP_ENHANCEDIDLE. It was 0 so I just flipped it to 1
with IMAP_USELOCKS=1 and see what happens. Then I'll set them both to 0 as
I rarely if ever use shared
Mark Constable writes:
On 26/05/14 00:00, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Or, turn off IMAPENHANCEDIDLE, to see if that makes a difference.
Ah right, I see, it's IMAP_ENHANCEDIDLE. It was 0 so I just flipped it to 1
with IMAP_USELOCKS=1 and see what happens. Then I'll set them both to 0 as
Well,
