On Wed 20/Jun/2012 01:36:32 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Jun 11 20:57:34 north courierlocal: [...] size=5061
Jun 11 20:53:18 north courierlocal: [...] size=4921
The supposedly lost message was just 140 bytes longer than the second
(size should have increased by 1k at
Alessandro Vesely writes:
On Tue 19/Jun/2012 05:53:35 +0200 Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/14/2012 03:30 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
It should wind up in the Return-Path: header, if everything is set up
properly.
Actually, I searched for the from address. It matches Return-Path
except if
On 06/14/2012 03:30 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
It should wind up in the Return-Path: header, if everything is set up
properly.
Thanks, Sam. You're right, but I'm still pretty sure there's at least
one log entry that Alessandro missed and searching the Mailbox and log
file for the message ID
On Tue 12/Jun/2012 14:37:43 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
I apparently lost a message. I found it in the log:
[...]
But it wasn't in the folder it should have gone to. It isn't
anywhere.
The Maildrop recipe consists of if (...) { ...; to ./...; }
and terminates
On 06/12/2012 05:15 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
But it wasn't in the folder it should have gone to. It isn't
anywhere. I only have seven (other) messages from that guy,
so I run a
find ./Maildir -type f | xargs grep -li @
search, but it only found the same seven messages as the
Gordon Messmer writes:
On 06/12/2012 05:15 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
But it wasn't in the folder it should have gone to. It isn't
anywhere. I only have seven (other) messages from that guy,
so I run a
find ./Maildir -type f | xargs grep -li @
search, but it only found the
