Re: [courier-users] Poll: C++11 compiler support

Bowie Bailey writes: On 3/5/2017 5:10 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Ok, so squeeze should be taken care of, and most likely CentOS 5 and > 6. Thanks for testing it. CentOS 6 is using gcc 4.4.7 and works fine with the '-std=c++0x' flag. CentOS 5 is using gcc 4.1.2 and does not work. $ g++

Re: [courier-users] Poll: C++11 compiler support

On 3/5/2017 5:10 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Ok, so squeeze should be taken care of, and most likely CentOS 5 and > 6. Thanks for testing it. CentOS 6 is using gcc 4.4.7 and works fine with the '-std=c++0x' flag. CentOS 5 is using gcc 4.1.2 and does not work. $ g++ -std=c++0x -o utest

Re: [courier-users] Poll: C++11 compiler support

SZÉPE Viktor writes: Idézem/Quoting Freddie Witherden : > Hi, > > On 05/03/2017 13:03, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >>> $ g++ -o utest u.c >>> u.c: In function ‘int main()’: >>> u.c:5: error: ‘char32_t’ was not declared in this scope >>> u.c:5: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘c’

Re: [courier-users] Poll: C++11 compiler support

Idézem/Quoting Freddie Witherden : > Hi, > > On 05/03/2017 13:03, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >>> $ g++ -o utest u.c >>> u.c: In function ‘int main()’: >>> u.c:5: error: ‘char32_t’ was not declared in this scope >>> u.c:5: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘c’ >>> u.c:6: error:

Re: [courier-users] Poll: C++11 compiler support

Hi, On 05/03/2017 13:03, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >> $ g++ -o utest u.c >> u.c: In function ‘int main()’: >> u.c:5: error: ‘char32_t’ was not declared in this scope >> u.c:5: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘c’ >> u.c:6: error: ‘u32string’ is not a member of ‘std’ >> u.c:6: error: expected ‘;’ before

Re: [courier-users] Poll: C++11 compiler support

SZÉPE Viktor writes: This is the case in Debian releases: squeeze with gcc-4.4 $ g++ -o utest u.c u.c: In function ‘int main()’: u.c:5: error: ‘char32_t’ was not declared in this scope u.c:5: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘c’ u.c:6: error: ‘u32string’ is not a member of ‘std’ u.c:6: error:

Re: [courier-users] Poll: C++11 compiler support

Idézem/Quoting Sam Varshavchik : > The forward match of progress is requiring a clean break from the > pre-c++11 days. Under consideration is migrating the courier-unicode > library, used by both Courier and Cone, to use C++11's unicode > support only. > > I am taking

[courier-users] Poll: C++11 compiler support

The forward match of progress is requiring a clean break from the pre-c++11 days. Under consideration is migrating the courier-unicode library, used by both Courier and Cone, to use C++11's unicode support only. I am taking a poll whether there's still any notable platforms where Courier