Sam Varshavchik writes:
> Alessandro Vesely writes:
> [...]
> > [...] Since the patch also modifies libfilter.h, it allows
> > a sysv filter to call lf_sysv_accept directly and get 0 to exit,
> > or -1 for error, as documented therein.
>
> Your patch makes no difference as far as the rest of the
Alessandro Vesely writes:
> Sam Varshavchik writes:
>> Your patch does not make any sense. Instead of returning -1, you're
>> returning 0, and changing it to -1 in a wrapper function.
>
> Exactly: that way existing filters don't get broken.
>
>> In other words, your patch does absolutely no
Sam Varshavchik writes:
> Alessandro Vesely writes:
>
> > Sam,
> > I have troubles using lf_accept in my filter. That's
> > because I to catch a HUP signal by getting out of select
> > with errno set to EINTR (the so-called SysV signal semantics.)
> > Since lf_accept returns -1 in that case and
Alessandro Vesely writes:
> Sam,
> I have troubles using lf_accept in my filter. That's
> because I to catch a HUP signal by getting out of select
> with errno set to EINTR (the so-called SysV signal semantics.)
> Since lf_accept returns -1 in that case and trusting errno is
> not very reliable,
