[courier-users] Re: IMAP account sharing
Mitch (WebCob) writes: Hey Sam. What makes FreeBSD miss the preferred list? FAM. I'm behind in the versions, and have to look into this FAM thing - but is it possible? There's some conflicting documentation whether or not FAM supports FreeBSD's native kqueue kernel interface. If not, FAM will still run on FreeBSD, but in fallback polling mode. In the worst case, clients will not receive changes made by other clients in real time, but after some delay. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [courier-users] Re: Courier-IMAP 2.1.2 uses tons of bandwidth
--On Sunday, October 05, 2003 9:12 PM -0400 Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeff Tucker writes: In fact, I've done just that. This machine is now running 1.6 and I've verified that UIDL returns the same UIDL as the other 1.6 clients. All three machines return the same UIDL. What do I have to do to upgrade to 2.1 and make it return the same UIDLs as the 1.6 clients? It appears to me that make install-strip, make install-configure doesn't do it as that's exactly what I did before. A normal upgrade should do that. If this is not happening for you, there must be something else that's going on. Make sure that you are indeed upgrading to 2.1, not 2.0. 2.0.x will not work. OK, I'll be glad to try again. In fact, I've just downloaded the latest 20031005 snapshot and I'll try installing that. FTR, the version I'm currently running is courier-imap-1.6.0.20021025. The original courier-imap was installed in the default /usr/lib/courier-imap location on a Linux system. I have a test account with one email in it. Checking the UIDL of that message, I see: UIDL +OK 1 1065192807.4477000609.blade6 This matches the filename of the email file, stored on an external NFS server. Building the new software was simple: (as jeff) ./configure make (as root) make install In this case, I didn't run make install-configure since I had previously done that with 2.1.2. I didn't undo those changes when I went back to 1.6 as it didn't seem like extra options would hurt anything. Now, from /usr/lib/courier-imap/libexec: ./pop3d.rc start And now the UIDL for that same message is: 1 UID1-1065239015 Looking at the new courierpop3dsizelist file, it has two lines. This file didn't exist before, but now is: /2 2 1065495459 1065192807.4477000609.blade6:2,S 1498 1:1065495459 So, it looks like the old UIDL was based on the filename. The new UIDL is based on this field in the courierpop3dsizelist, maybe. Looking at the code, the important line is this: if (msglist_a[i]-uid.n != 0) If this is true, then the UIDL is a version 1 or 2 UIDL and the pattern can't possibly match the old version 0 UIDL. Again in the code, uid.n appears to be assigned reading out of this courierpop3dsizelist file. I haven't studied the code in great detail, but I don't see how the system will ever end up with the filename as a modern UIDL. Sam, what am I missing? Or what were you expecting that isn't here? My old 1.6 pop3dserver.c simply prints the filename for the UIDL. What do I need to do to make 2.1.2 do the same? Jeff --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] showing sent files
--On Montag, 6. Oktober 2003 10:06 + Jeff Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 06 October 2003 08:54, Peer Oliver Schmidt wrote: That is controlled by the client, not the server. Unfortunately not all clients support this. Outlook cannot do this, for instance, while Outlook Express can. Outlook can do it. You have to define a rule. This rule has to be configured as to be applied to all outgoing eMails. True. My experience with it is that it only works for one email account. We often have multiple imap accounts open and I'd like it to store the proper Sent items with the proper account. But it's an all or nothing thing as far as I can see. There's no way (that I've found) for the rule to know which account it has sent the mail and so sort it correctly. Mulberry handles this (and everything else related to multiple imap accounts or identities) just fine, no need for Outbreak. Roland --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Re: IMAP account sharing
Sam Varshavchik wrote: For best results, you should be running Linux or IRIX on the server, with FAM enabled, and using an IMAP client that supports the IDLE IMAP extension. speaking of FAM - has anybody ever used FAM together with courier-imap (on linux) in a larger environment? - we have never been successful in deploying it on our production system (~60k mailboxes) due to lots of crashes. Stefan --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Spamassassin ... configuration by domain (Virtualhost?)
Hello, I exlpain the situation, I have 2 linux server. On the first one, I have web site, dbase, qmail 1.03, vpopmail. On the second one, qmail 1.03, qmail-queue, qmail-scanner, clamav and spamassassin On the first server, for one domaine (for the moment) I changed the Bind configuration (MX) to send mail to the second server to check (spam/virus). The mail arrived one the second server are send back to the first one by smtproutes. that's work fine. Now, I'd like a specific configuration (blacklist, whitelist, scoring, ...) for each domain. I don't know at all how to do that. Do you have an idea ? Thanks, Christian, --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
RE: [courier-users] Re: IMAP account sharing
Certainly. Multiple logins to the same account are allowed. For best results, you should be running Linux or IRIX on the server, with FAM enabled, and using an IMAP client that supports the IDLE IMAP extension. When these requirements are met, changes made to the folder's contents by one login are immediately shown by the other login, in realtime. cool, thanks. Does Outlook (2000) support IDLE IMAP? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: Courier-IMAP 2.1.2 uses tons of bandwidth
Jeff Tucker writes:
I haven't studied the code in great detail, but I don't see how the system
will ever end up with the filename as a modern UIDL. Sam, what am I
missing? Or what were you expecting that isn't here? My old 1.6
pop3dserver.c simply prints the filename for the UIDL. What do I need to do
to make 2.1.2 do the same?
Try the following patch. The upgrade logic may not be working correctly.
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- imap/pop3dserver.c 5 Oct 2003 04:47:50 - 1.25
+++ imap/pop3dserver.c 7 Oct 2003 12:37:14 -
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@
if (ch != '\n')
{
- if (n sizeof(linebuf)-3)
+ if (n sizeof(linebuf)-5)
linebuf[n++]=ch;
continue;
}
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@
n=0;
if (vernum == 0)
- strcat(linebuf, 0);
+ strcat(linebuf, 0 0);
/* Convert version 0 to version 1 format - PRESTO! */
if ((p=strrchr(linebuf, ' ')) == NULL)
@@ -238,6 +238,9 @@
case 3:
m-size=sz;
m-next=list;
+
+ if (m-size == 0 m-uid.uidv == 0)
+ calcsize(m); /* VERSION 0 */
list=m;
++mcnt;
break;
pgp1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [courier-users] POP-SSL some Mails are doubled
Markus, This is probably a problem caused by Outlook. I had the same problem some time ago. http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=317945 Your users will need to install Ofice service pack 2. Regards Miguel - Original Message - From: Markus Schabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 11:22 AM Subject: [courier-users] POP-SSL some Mails are doubled Hello! We have a setup with imap, pop, imap-ssl and pop-ssl running. In IMAP there are no problems (with and without ssl), POP works also fine, but with POP-SSL user's report to get mails more than one time (e.g. 2-3 times). Any idea what could cause this problem? regards Markus --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Migrating from Cyrus to Courier
Hello, I use Cyrus on my email server. Cyrus includes and IMAP server as well as a 'deliver' agent. That deliver program is called by the MTA (postfix in my case) to deliver the mail in the proper mailbox. I understand that courier uses Maildir. I am looking for a way to convert my Cyrus mailboxes to Maildirs. Once I get that done, I don't think I will have a problem using Courier as my IMAP server (and I will be HAPPY about that) Has anybody here done that before? Any documents I should read? Haim. -- poetry - cooking - eating - talking - singing - acting - working - enjoying. Because tapping on a glass sounds better than honking a horn. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] bofhbadmime=accept pre/contra
I'm thinking of turning on 'accept' for badmime mail by creating the 'bofh' control file w/ opt BOFHBADMIME=accept My wife complains many times that she has to save some msgs first (as html files if she remembers to change the default 'message.txt'), than start her fileviewer to finally read the html mail. To me that sounds OK if it is safer to receive the mail like this. -(Safety is more important than some extra work..)- BUT: how true exactly is this? I mean: does it really matter that much to just let the mail get through? Is it much more unsafe? Or what? I like some kind of feedback on this, if possible from a viewpoint to receiving email (not just a courier view ;-)) -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.8 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody) + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilya --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Migrating from Cyrus to Courier
Haim Dimer wrote: I understand that courier uses Maildir. I am looking for a way to convert my Cyrus mailboxes to Maildirs. Once I get that done, I don't think I will have a problem using Courier as my IMAP server (and I will be HAPPY about that) Has anybody here done that before? Any documents I should read? http://www.madness.at/projects/ written by a friend of mine (with some bugs ähm help from myself) - an earlier version of this has been used to convert some 25000 mailboxes from cyrus 1.6 to Maildir/courier-imap. Stefan --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Migrating from Cyrus to Courier
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Haim Dimer wrote: Hello, I use Cyrus on my email server. Cyrus includes and IMAP server as well as a 'deliver' agent. That deliver program is called by the MTA (postfix in my case) to deliver the mail in the proper mailbox. I understand that courier uses Maildir. I am looking for a way to convert my Cyrus mailboxes to Maildirs. Once I get that done, I don't think I will have a problem using Courier as my IMAP server (and I will be HAPPY about that) Has anybody here done that before? Any documents I should read? Look on freshmeat for a conversion program that converts from Cyrus to courier. How much are you converting? What do you use as the MTA? If the MTA can deliver to maildirs directly, do that. Otherwise, maildrop (and that is a more complicated answer). I've never used it, so (as with all things) back up your data, etc... -- Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is two wolves attempting to have a sheep for dinner and finding a well-informed, well-armed sheep. Jon Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] C and Python Code Gardener --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Migrating from Cyrus to Courier
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 10:42, Haim Dimer wrote: Hello, I use Cyrus on my email server. Cyrus includes and IMAP server as well as a 'deliver' agent. That deliver program is called by the MTA (postfix in my case) to deliver the mail in the proper mailbox. I understand that courier uses Maildir. I am looking for a way to convert my Cyrus mailboxes to Maildirs. Once I get that done, I don't think I will have a problem using Courier as my IMAP server (and I will be HAPPY about that) Here's one way: http://batleth.sapienti-sat.org/projects/mb2md/ Steve -- Stephen Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] ENSCO, Inc. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] bofhbadmime=accept pre/contra
On 07 10 2003 at 2:38 pm -0400, dick hoogendijk wrote: To me that sounds OK if it is safer to receive the mail like this. -(Safety is more important than some extra work..)- BUT: how true exactly is this? I mean: does it really matter that much to just let the mail get through? Is it much more unsafe? Or what? I can't see any issue of safety, unless you don't trust your mail client. (Bet you're an Outlook user, eh?) -ben -- Ben Kennedy, chief magician zygoat creative technical services 613-228-3392 | 1-866-466-4628 http://www.zygoat.ca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Re: IMAP account sharing
Carey Jung wrote: Certainly. Multiple logins to the same account are allowed. For best results, you should be running Linux or IRIX on the server, with FAM enabled, and using an IMAP client that supports the IDLE IMAP extension. When these requirements are met, changes made to the folder's contents by one login are immediately shown by the other login, in realtime. cool, thanks. Does Outlook (2000) support IDLE IMAP? Yes. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] rpm weirdness
Howdy: I've been having trouble building courier rpms on RedHat 7.3 (which worked fine on another machine a few months ago). On this machine, I started with the latest source package (0.43.2) which had rpm build errors. I couldn't find any answers by googling or asking in #courier, so I tried a slightly older package (0.39.3) and then an older one (0.37.3) just to see if it was an issue with the oldness of RedHat 7.3, even though I have all the current updates for it. Both of the above also had build problems, but with different errors, so I decided to see if it was the make check part failing. After commenting out that one line in the spec file, 0.37.3 built successfully. My rpm command line is: rpm -ba --define 'xflags --enable-https --enable-workarounds-for-imap-client-bugs' courier.spec Now, I read the INSTALL doc and other stuff, and it did say that make check would fail with the above options, and to do the check part first without the options, then configure again and build with these options. How does this help when building rpms? It seems to me it's impossible to build an rpm (with the above options) if make check always fails. What is the work-around I'm missing? I don't remember what I did last time (on the other machine) but I didn't run into this issue. Can somebody please enlighten me? Thanks in advance, Steve -- Stephen Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] ENSCO, Inc. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Connection closed
Hi I have done a complete installation of Courier-IMAP. I have tested it and from the beginning everything seemed alright. The mails where downloaded from the server just as it should. But after a while the problems came... I have several accounts on the server that shall be checked by one mail-client, this time MS Outlook Express. After checking some of the accounts I got the message The server has terminated the connection or something like that. When I tried to do telnet mail 143, It connects and immediately disconnects. To fix the problem I had to logout my user (windows) and login again. Then I could check the other accounts. This keeps happening all the time. I have no idea what is wrong. Thanks in advance /J Lindroos _ Last ned nye MSN Messenger 6.0 gratis http://www.msn.no/computing/messenger - Den raskeste veien mellom deg og dine venner --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Connection closed
Do what Jeff said in this message that he posted yesterday. MAXPERIP is usually set to 4 (I think) and your client is likely opening more than 4 connections from the same IP. So crank that up to 16 or something, and you should be good to go. From: Jeff Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [courier-users] number of connections Date: October 6, 2003 9:20:29 AM PDT To: Courier Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Monday 06 October 2003 12:08, Jesper Goos wrote: Hi I need to know how I change the number of allowed connections in my IMAP installation... /etc/courier/imapd for rpm builds or /usr/lib/courier/etc/imapd otherwise MAXPERIP = the max number of connections from one IP address MAXDAEMONS = the max number of connections total from all users Jeff Jansen --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users On Oct 7, 2003, at 2:39 AM, Jörgen Lindroos wrote: Hi I have done a complete installation of Courier-IMAP. I have tested it and from the beginning everything seemed alright. The mails where downloaded from the server just as it should. But after a while the problems came... I have several accounts on the server that shall be checked by one mail-client, this time MS Outlook Express. After checking some of the accounts I got the message The server has terminated the connection or something like that. When I tried to do telnet mail 143, It connects and immediately disconnects. To fix the problem I had to logout my user (windows) and login again. Then I could check the other accounts. This keeps happening all the time. I have no idea what is wrong. Thanks in advance /J Lindroos _ Last ned nye MSN Messenger 6.0 gratis http://www.msn.no/computing/messenger - Den raskeste veien mellom deg og dine venner --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] couriermlm archive access
I'm trying to use couriermlm to administer some mailing lists. Everything is working fine expect for the archive function. I have the lists set to only allow subscribed members to access the archive. However, every time anyone tries, they get a DSN stating that they must be subscribed. Everything else is working just fine. I'm not a C coder, so I don't really know where to start looking in the source. I'm running version 0.42.2. Is this perhaps a bug that has been fixed since? Thanks, Matthew --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
