Nevermind -- I suspected some sort of CRLF issue and I think I've
narrowed it down to a bug in PoCo::Client::NNTP. At least, a one line
patch seems to have prevented my seeing any more issues so far.
I'll post the patch to RT for Chris.
-- David
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:19 PM, David Golden <[EM
# from David Golden
# on Tuesday 09 September 2008 16:00:
>This would be better if I finally updated CPAN::Reporter::Smoker to
>take an arbitrary list of distributions instead of just working
>backwards through CPAN and if you had a list of distributions with
>Build.PL.
Indeed I do have such a li
I'm parsing out recently sent reports from the NNTP server in
preparation for my 'nagbot' and I'm seeing some reports with
extraneous newlines in the header that prevents (easy/automatic)
parsing as a proper message.
Here are some examples (each prefixed with a "-=-=-=-=-=..." sequence.
Any ideas
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:52 PM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Incidentally, using ...::Transport::File makes my tests run a *lot*
> faster. Once the reporting mechanism has stabilised after the changes
> that are currently afoot, I think I might switch to doing this and then
> batchi
David Golden wrote:
> On this thread, Eric asked how to run a "scientific" style test.
> Here's an idea based on CPAN Testers tools -- though not necessarily
> CPAN Testers output.
>
> a) Configure CPAN::Reporter to use the Test::Reporter::Transport::File
> transport -- this will save reports int
On this thread, Eric asked how to run a "scientific" style test.
Here's an idea based on CPAN Testers tools -- though not necessarily
CPAN Testers output.
a) Configure CPAN::Reporter to use the Test::Reporter::Transport::File
transport -- this will save reports into a directory
b) Run CPAN::Repo
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 02:27:09 -0700, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> I have said it, I have (well, CPAN::Testers::ParseReport has)
>> downloaded 56000 reports from
>> http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/
> No, I meant what *testers*.
I could tell you but you could
It occurred to me that with the recent developer release of CPANPLUS
( 0.85_04 ) that some of the issues that CPANPLUS::Dist::YACSmoke
was munging test reports for have been solved.
Especially as CPANPLUS-0.85_04 adds the output buffer to NA reports.
This was something that CPANPLUS::Dist::YACSmo
You already have all the good reasons!
If someone needs more reasons than this, that person needs to switch to
another language where they can pay $$ for support.
What I 'd really like to see is the possibility to force a user to send
feedback. My module is not free, it costs a report when it
As I mentioned earlier I think one of the improvements
CPAN Testers need is diversity. That is, to get more people
to send in reports from various platforms.
So I wonder besides the warm feeling of giving back to the community
how else could we get more people to send reports?
I am not talking abo
# from Andreas J. Koenig
# on Tuesday 09 September 2008 00:09:
>OK, I walk you through them. First off, there are ten cases in the
>file I sent you.
>...
> So the above is a case where it's impossible to judge without
> looking at the report but at the same time we cannot have any
> expectation
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:36:00 -0700, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> # from Andreas J. Koenig
> # on Monday 08 September 2008 15:16:
>> Since yesterday I have downloaded and analysed ~56000 testreports from
>> cpantesters and found ~135 distros that have been tested by both MB
12 matches
Mail list logo
