Re: MISSING PREREQUISITES: Sub::Identify

2009-08-18 Thread David Golden
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Ingo Lantschner wrote: > in Build.PL is responsible for creating the Makefile.PL. But it only > includes the requirements of requires and build_requires into the Makefile - > not the ones listed in configure_requires. So systems using Makefile.PL will > fail, if SUP

Re: Re: MISSING PREREQUISITES: Sub::Identify

2009-08-18 Thread sisyphus1
> Ingo Lantschner wrote: > > > Am 18.08.2009 um 04:54 schrieb Sisyphus: > > > I think that, in your Makefile.PL, WriteMakefile() should specify > > 'SUPER' => 0 in PREREQ_PM (assuming, of course, that *any* version > > of SUPER will suffice). > ok, I think after re-reading the documenta

Re: MISSING PREREQUISITES: Sub::Identify

2009-08-18 Thread Ingo Lantschner
Am 18.08.2009 um 04:54 schrieb Sisyphus: I think that, in your Makefile.PL, WriteMakefile() should specify 'SUPER' => 0 in PREREQ_PM (assuming, of course, that *any* version of SUPER will suffice). ok, I think after re-reading the documentation of Module::Build if have found the point. The

Re: MISSING PREREQUISITES: Sub::Identify

2009-08-18 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 07:42:44PM +0200, Ingo Lantschner wrote: > May be I have not got the point of use, require and prerequisites yet, > but as of my present understanding, it is NOT the idea to require > indirect prerequisites (something that a module I already require > requires). > >