Testers, your thoughts?
-- Forwarded message --
From: James E Keenan jk...@verizon.net
Date: Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:21 AM
Subject: CPAN Testers Using 5.12.0?
To: David Golden xda...@gmail.com
David,
I've started getting reports of failures on two of my CPAN distros --
reports
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 08:36:49AM -0400, David Golden wrote:
Testers, your thoughts?
I know a few of us are indeed testing with perl-5.12.0-RC0
It doesn't appear to show up as that in the reports though.
This bit:
Characteristics of this binary (from libperl):
Compile-time options:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 08:36:49AM -0400, David Golden wrote:
I've started getting reports of failures on two of my CPAN distros --
reports in which the testers say they are using Perl version '5.12.0'.
Example: http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/6989462
Has 5.12.0 been released? (I
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:15:04AM -0400, David Golden wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams
ch...@bingosnet.co.uk wrote:
This bit:
Characteristics of this binary (from libperl):
Compile-time options: PERL_DONT_CREATE_GVSV PERL_MALLOC_WRAP
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Barbie bar...@missbarbell.co.uk wrote:
If it does, mine can be quickly patched to match it ;)
Should an RC be classed as a patched version or an official release? I
would think the former.
Patched, certainly.
David
David Golden wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Barbie bar...@missbarbell.co.uk wrote:
If it does, mine can be quickly patched to match it ;)
Should an RC be classed as a patched version or an official release? I
would think the former.
Patched, certainly.
David
Yes,
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:19 PM, p...@0ne.us p...@0ne.us wrote:
Yes, that was the impression I got from #p5p on IRC. They sorta expected
it to be a quiet release and used just to test things. I blame BinGOs'
bots for announcing it everywhere and making everyone excited :)
However, I
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Barbie bar...@missbarbell.co.uk wrote:
I'd prefer it not to be there too, but not sure where to put it instead.
Will have think later, unless someone comes up with a better idea first
CPAN::Testers::Common::Article parses for an extra stanza and that
could be
I've worked up a patch for Test::Reporter that would munge the
myconfig line into this:
Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 12 subversion 0 RC 0) configuration:
It's fragile -- will break if there are other locally applied patches,
but checks out on the 5.12.0-rc0 that I compiled.
I'm
We could also add another X- header.
X-Test-Reporter-Perl: 5.12.0 RC0
Assuming Barbie updates CPAN::Testers::Common::Article to prefer that
over other things, we could at least keep the stats database clean.
It doesn't help how reports are displayed, but maybe perl version can
be added to
p...@0ne.us wrote:
Yes, that was the impression I got from #p5p on IRC. They sorta expected
it to be a quiet release and used just to test things. I blame BinGOs'
bots for announcing it everywhere and making everyone excited :)
Perl roadmap implies that a new development version is released
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:55:20PM -0400, David Golden wrote:
We could also add another X- header.
X-Test-Reporter-Perl: 5.12.0 RC0
Assuming Barbie updates CPAN::Testers::Common::Article to prefer that
over other things, we could at least keep the stats database clean.
It doesn't help
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Barbie bar...@missbarbell.co.uk wrote:
I'm happy to go with either solution. Though the summary line version
probably is the more correct solution, the X-header would be the easier
to parse.
OK. It turned out to be a lot more work than I originally
Anyone beta testing with 5.12.0 RC0, please update to this version
(and the latest Test::Reporter).
Barbie -- since Metabase doesn't have mail headers, you will have to
pick up the proper perl version using the right content field from the
LegacyReport or TestSummary facts (or else duplicate the
14 matches
Mail list logo
