Re: Locating Perl Modules that need extra attention (especially on Windows)

>>> Is there a way to fetch all the distributions that have no successful >>> test reports on Windows? >> >> There is now: >> >> http://stats.cpantesters.org/noreports/mswin32.html >> >> Along with all other Operating Systems :) >> Thanks again for this. Would it be possible to see the list sorted

Re: Locating Perl Modules that need extra attention (especially on Windows)

And another request, would it be possible to fetch these lists in some machine readable format? Gabor

Re: Locating Perl Modules that need extra attention (especially on Windows)

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 06:02:25PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote: > Recently there were a couple of blogs posts trying to identify the > modules that would > need the most attention. The solution were focusing on bug reports and > recent activity, > but I think the data collected by the CPAN Testers co

Prerequisite version too low Need 1.50 have 1.5

Hi, While trying to install Module-Packaged-0.86.tar.gz on Windows it had a test failure but it has not been reported because of this. I am not sure what does that mean. Is the version number comparison in CPAN::Reporter broken or should Module-Packaged declare Sort::Versions 1.5 as prerequisite?

Re: smoking with 5.15, 5.13

On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 09:07:32AM -0800, MPR wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Andreas Koenig > wrote: > > One might argue the ultimate goal of cpantesters is to find bugs. I'd > > say yes, but the bugs should be relevant. Bugs in very old and > > irrelevant combinations are *usually* nois

Re: smoking with 5.15, 5.13

* David Cantrell [2013-01-04T09:19:43] > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 09:07:32AM -0800, MPR wrote: > > You say "usually". Is there a case where it might be useful to test > > and send reports against an old version? > > Sure. Even if a module's author doesn't care, the module's users do. > And cpXXXa

Re: smoking with 5.15, 5.13

On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:19:43PM +, David Cantrell wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 09:07:32AM -0800, MPR wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Andreas Koenig > > wrote: > > > One might argue the ultimate goal of cpantesters is to find bugs. I'd > > > say yes, but the bugs should be rel

Re: smoking with 5.15, 5.13

* Nigel Horne [2013-01-04T09:43:13] > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:19:43PM +, David Cantrell wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 09:07:32AM -0800, MPR wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Andreas Koenig > > > wrote: > > > > One might argue the ultimate goal of cpantesters is to find bugs

Re: smoking with 5.15, 5.13

On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:32:14AM -0500, Ricardo Signes wrote: > * Nigel Horne [2013-01-04T09:43:13] > > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:19:43PM +, David Cantrell wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 09:07:32AM -0800, MPR wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Andreas Koenig > > > > wrote

Re: Prerequisite version too low Need 1.50 have 1.5

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote: > I am not sure what does that mean. Is the version number comparison in > CPAN::Reporter > broken or should Module-Packaged declare Sort::Versions 1.5 as prerequisite? CPAN::Reporter uses CPAN::Version for version comparisions. (I wish we could

Re: Prerequisite version too low Need 1.50 have 1.5

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Lars Thegler wrote: > Yes, version.pm says "1.50" == "1.5". But both CPAN::Version and > Sort::Versions disagree. Who is to say which is correct? We could > easily find lots and lots of people on the Internet disagreeing > heartily on this matter :) The only thing

Re: smoking with 5.15, 5.13

Ricardo Signes writes: >> When a test passes with perl 5.14 and fails with 5.16, then we will >> probably be interested in the results with 5.15 (e.g. >> http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Attribute-Util%201.06 ) > > I'm not sure that this is really a good example. The question is whether > any

Re: Prerequisite version too low Need 1.50 have 1.5

David Golden writes: > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote: >> I am not sure what does that mean. Is the version number comparison in >> CPAN::Reporter >> broken or should Module-Packaged declare Sort::Versions 1.5 as prerequisite? > > CPAN::Reporter uses CPAN::Version for version

Re: Locating Perl Modules that need extra attention (especially on Windows)

On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:54:23PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote: > >>> Is there a way to fetch all the distributions that have no successful > >>> test reports on Windows? > >> > >> There is now: > >> > >> http://stats.cpantesters.org/noreports/mswin32.html > >> > >> Along with all other Operating Syst

Re: Locating Perl Modules that need extra attention (especially on Windows)

On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 01:11:33PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote: > And another request, would it be possible to fetch these lists in some > machine readable format? I'll sort that out for the next release. Cheers, Barbie. -- Birmingham Perl Mongers Memoirs Of A Roadie

Re: Locating Perl Modules that need extra attention (especially on Windows)

I think it's also prudent to separate Strawberry from AS, Cygwin to MinGW. On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Barbie wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 01:11:33PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote: >> And another request, would it be possible to fetch these lists in some >> machine readable format? > > I'll s

Re: Locating Perl Modules that need extra attention (especially on Windows)

Barbie, thanks! On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Leo Susanto wrote: > I think it's also prudent to separate Strawberry from AS, Cygwin to MinGW. Leo, Cygwin is already separated and I am not sure there is enough information in the reports to separate Strawberry from ActiveState or Citrus Perl for