Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0

2014-06-02 Thread Jens Rehsack
Am 02.06.2014 um 13:34 schrieb David Golden x...@xdg.me: On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com wrote: Others (eg. packagers) have always a compiler and want benefit from XS when available and what is more important: if the DEVELOPER MODE FLAGS IS ON, they want to

Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0

2014-06-02 Thread David Golden
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com wrote: Am 02.06.2014 um 13:34 schrieb David Golden x...@xdg.me: On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com wrote: Others (eg. packagers) have always a compiler and want benefit from XS when available and what

Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0

2014-06-02 Thread David Golden
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com wrote: Web-Search for CPAN Testers magic strings doesn't provide suitable results - is there a list of those magic results? http://wiki.cpantesters.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes If I would know what is expected, I will make

Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0

2014-06-02 Thread Jens Rehsack
Am 02.06.2014 um 16:05 schrieb David Golden x...@xdg.me: On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com wrote: Web-Search for CPAN Testers magic strings doesn't provide suitable results - is there a list of those magic results?

Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0

2014-06-02 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
Hi Jens, * Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com [2014-06-02 13:30]: * Karen Etheridge p...@froods.org [2014-06-02 01:30]: I'm wondering why it isn't always possible to split a dist into two implementations, one PP and the other with XS optimizations. If the dist simply cannot be implemented

Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0

2014-06-02 Thread David Golden
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.de wrote: If I have my system set up to support XS then I want it to use XS, and if for some reason it can’t, then there is a bug somewhere that needs to be fixed, so I do *not* want it to silently give me the PP version and

Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0

2014-06-02 Thread Jens Rehsack
Am 03.06.2014 um 01:28 schrieb Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.de: * Karen Etheridge p...@froods.org [2014-06-02 01:30]: I do not see any gain in specifying give me XS or give me death. This I find easy to see, at least if we are talking of the general case: If I have my system set up

Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0

2014-06-02 Thread Jens Rehsack
Am 03.06.2014 um 01:42 schrieb David Golden x...@xdg.me: On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.de wrote: If I have my system set up to support XS then I want it to use XS, and if for some reason it can’t, then there is a bug somewhere that needs to be fixed, so I