Am 04.06.2014 um 07:00 schrieb Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com:
Am 04.06.2014 um 04:32 schrieb David Golden x...@xdg.me:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com wrote:
1) compiler cannot create executables
2) compiler works, but no perl headers
3) compiler does,
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:20PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
Am 01.06.2014 um 20:09 schrieb Peter Rabbitson rab...@rabbit.us:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 05:59:16PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
Am 01.06.2014 um 15:03 schrieb David Golden x...@xdg.me:
The only thing specified in the
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 05:59:16PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
Am 01.06.2014 um 15:03 schrieb David Golden x...@xdg.me:
The only thing specified in the lancaster consensus is what must
happen if that command-line argument is true.
I think making a distinction between 0 and undefined
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com wrote:
1) compiler cannot create executables
2) compiler works, but no perl headers
3) compiler does, but shared library building fails (that is fragile and
minor modifications at the system causes that process to fail)
These
Am 04.06.2014 um 04:32 schrieb David Golden x...@xdg.me:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com wrote:
1) compiler cannot create executables
2) compiler works, but no perl headers
3) compiler does, but shared library building fails (that is fragile and
minor
Am 02.06.2014 um 13:34 schrieb David Golden x...@xdg.me:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com wrote:
Others (eg. packagers) have always a compiler and want benefit from XS when
available and what is more important: if the DEVELOPER MODE FLAGS IS ON,
they want to
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 02.06.2014 um 13:34 schrieb David Golden x...@xdg.me:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com wrote:
Others (eg. packagers) have always a compiler and want benefit from XS when
available and what
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com wrote:
Web-Search for CPAN Testers magic strings doesn't provide suitable
results - is there a list of those magic results?
http://wiki.cpantesters.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes
If I would know what is expected, I will make
Am 02.06.2014 um 16:05 schrieb David Golden x...@xdg.me:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com wrote:
Web-Search for CPAN Testers magic strings doesn't provide suitable
results - is there a list of those magic results?
Hi Jens,
* Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com [2014-06-02 13:30]:
* Karen Etheridge p...@froods.org [2014-06-02 01:30]:
I'm wondering why it isn't always possible to split a dist into two
implementations, one PP and the other with XS optimizations. If the
dist simply cannot be implemented
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.de wrote:
If I have my system set up to support XS then I want it to use XS, and
if for some reason it can’t, then there is a bug somewhere that needs to
be fixed, so I do *not* want it to silently give me the PP version and
Am 03.06.2014 um 01:28 schrieb Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.de:
* Karen Etheridge p...@froods.org [2014-06-02 01:30]:
I do not see any gain in specifying give me XS or give me death.
This I find easy to see, at least if we are talking of the general case:
If I have my system set up
Am 03.06.2014 um 01:42 schrieb David Golden x...@xdg.me:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.de wrote:
If I have my system set up to support XS then I want it to use XS, and
if for some reason it can’t, then there is a bug somewhere that needs to
be fixed, so I
The only thing specified in the lancaster consensus is what must
happen if that command-line argument is true.
I think making a distinction between 0 and undefined will be
surprising to people and I would recommend against it.
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com
Am 01.06.2014 um 15:03 schrieb David Golden x...@xdg.me:
The only thing specified in the lancaster consensus is what must
happen if that command-line argument is true.
I think making a distinction between 0 and undefined will be
surprising to people and I would recommend against it.
Given
Am 01.06.2014 um 20:09 schrieb Peter Rabbitson rab...@rabbit.us:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 05:59:16PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
Am 01.06.2014 um 15:03 schrieb David Golden x...@xdg.me:
The only thing specified in the lancaster consensus is what must
happen if that command-line argument is
16 matches
Mail list logo
