On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Adam Back wrote:
This is cryptic
Adam made a funny. You hay have a future as a comic if crypto ever falls
flat.
If the law is based on precedence, why is the Constitution
not the
http://slashdot.org/articles/01/03/27/2339254.shtml
--
If the law is based on precedence, why is the Constitution
not the final precedence since it's the primary authority?
The Armadillo Group
http://www.google.com/search?num=100hl=enlr=safe=offq=Stop+%22Jim+Choate
%22+Spam
Committing random acts of journalism and PR since 1987
Jim's been pinged on this many, many times. He used to include
tens of kilobytes of HTML pages with his postings, but at least he's
gotten over that.
I've come to the conclusion that Jim is unable to see things
from another's viewpoint, and so regards it a bad trade to spend
30 seconds of his
http://www.google.com/search?num=100hl=enlr=safe=offq=Stop+%22Jim+Choate
%22+Spam
Committing random acts of journalism and PR since 1987
HOUSE ENERGY AND COMMERCE COMMITTEE Human Cloning Oversight and
Investigations Subcommittee hearing on "Issues Raised by Human Cloning
Research." Location: 2123 Rayburn House Office Building. 12 noon Contact:
202-225-2927 http://www.house.gov/commerce
Napster, the song swapping service, is being sued for
millions of dollars by the producers of the prestigious
awards show, the Grammys.
The National Academy of Recordings Arts and
Sciences (NARAS) says the service enabled users to
The RIAA has asked the court to order Napster to use
a "filter in" method, which would allow songs that
Napster is authorised to distribute to be placed on its
system, rather than blocking the swapping of
copyrighted music placed on its
--- Ken Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Physical anonymity is getting harder, but it's less hard in big cities.
There are a lot of anonymous people in cities. Those guys you see
sitting on the side of the road asking for money, they're anonymous. As
far as you're concerned anyway. Lost in the
--- Bill Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been 30 years since I read The Time Machine,
but didn't the Eloi only have 1 L in their name?
Yeah, I know. Got pissed off after finding out that *ALL* fictious and
real names are taken.
If you care, find an anonymizer to read your webmail
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:51:34AM -0400, Adam Back wrote:
This is cryptic -- how do I know what this link will be about from your
subject line. Can't you quote as ascii the first paragraph, or write your
own summary, or something?
If you can't be bothered to do that, the reference is not
Peter wrote:
I've come to the conclusion that Jim is
unable to see things from another's
viewpoint, and so regards it a bad trade
to spend 30 seconds of his own time to
save man-hours of wasted effort by his
readers.
I'm torn between this "social retardation" explanation and the feeling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
W W
\*\ /*/
The Road Kill Group |*| |*|
/*|*\ |\-
(|\((x)\
Jim is about as educable as a California politican, and even less friendly.
He has shifted from being an eccentric list member to something closer
to a list-saboteur.
-Declan
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:51:34AM -0400, Adam Back wrote:
This is cryptic -- how do I know what this link will be
From: "Walsh, Brian J" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Barr Works to Reform Secret Evidence Laws
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:14:17 -0500
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT:
Brian Walsh
WEDNESDAY MARCH 28, 2001
Declan McCullagh[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Jim is about as educable as a California politican, and even less
friendly.
He has shifted from being an eccentric list member to something closer
to a list-saboteur.
-Declan
This thought has occurred to me, too. At least once a month, a large
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Jim Choate blathered:
Anonymizer.com does cookie blocking with the premium accounts, I
believe.
And now they have your credit card #...
No, ninny, they do not. Anonymizer accepts cash payments.
https://www.anonymizer.com/signup/sign_up.shtml
Why don't you check
You're one to talk.
Money order sales are recorded on video camera. Each money order has a
time stamp with vendor ID. I can't speak for youk, but it would take me as
a LEA about 5 minutes to take a money order, find the vendor, and get
subpeona on the video surveillance. At that point I have
The UPS uses very effective computer character recognition. How long do
you think it'll take 'em (if they aren't now) to drop a traffic analysis
system in there to look for 'known writing samples'? Not very long I
suspect. And mail is tracked with respect to pickup by the very way it's
sorted in
Never assume your opponent is a fool, even if they are. Always try to make
your opponent think you are.
They are not stupid. They are motivated and believe in what they are
doing. These are the kinds of people that believe you made a mistake and
they're willing to spend whatever it takes to
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
The only way to pay in cash is two either send it through the mail (you do
know about the cash sniffing dogs used at the UPS and airports don't you?)
"cash sniffing dogs?" C'mon, jim, I'm pretty paranoid, but that's
just *out there*. Got a cite? I
http://www.apbonline.com/newscenter/breakingnews/2000/12/29/customs_seize1229_01.html
--
If the law is based on precedence, why is the Constitution
not the final precedence since it's the primary
Go to google.com use
'cash sniffing dogs'
Enjoy the extensive reading.
If the law is based on precedence, why is the Constitution
not the final precedence since it's the primary authority?
The
Jim wrote:
Money order sales are recorded on video
camera...
All? Everywhere? I doubt it, but that's what good theatrical makeup is
for.
...Each money order has a time stamp with
vendor ID. I can't speak for youk, but it
would take me as a LEA about 5 minutes to
take a money order,
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/jlnlabs/html/oa_plasmoid.htm
--
If the law is based on precedence, why is the Constitution
not the final precedence since it's the primary authority?
The Armadillo
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
Jim wrote:
Money order sales are recorded on video
camera...
All? Everywhere? I doubt it, but that's what good theatrical makeup is
for.
I haven't seen a MO vendor that was video recorded in years. It wouldn't
surprise me if the MO
Now the Western Washington District Court has removed
all TIFF images of court filings. Whether that is due to Judge
Jack's expanding his order forbidding public disclosure of
discovery materials after we put a bunch of Jim's filings on
the Net, or another counterterrorist ploy to censor Jim
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
I haven't seen a MO vendor that was video recorded in years. It wouldn't
^^^
wasn't
If the law is based
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, John Young wrote:
Now the Western Washington District Court has removed
all TIFF images of court filings. Whether that is due to Judge
I'd bet one of the various search engines will have them archived...
Since when did
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Alan Olsen wrote:
Since when did search engines archive images?
Quite a while now. Google for example has a long history of being a
saviour for many a lost webpage. You can also look at the various database
projects that 'store the Internet'. IBM has one.
Originally appeared in newsgroup alt.privacy.anon-server...
Subject: Re: [INFO] Keep tuned: Script-Kiddie and ilk against Frog
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I Sent Your Saddle Home)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:05:45 GMT
On 28 Mar 2001 15:05:28 -, Frog-Admin threw some more dry wood on
his funeral
Welcome to Sybase on the Web!
This confirmation message is sent to all users
when they create a Web based account with Sybase.
Your Sybase username is: cypherpun
You have registered with Sybase using the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want to change your account information
go
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Alan Olsen wrote:
Since when did search engines archive images?
If you know of a machine that searched that site and it hasn't been too
long the images will be in the cache as well (if it's turned on).
So, if you looked at the site yesterday, those images are
Jim wrote:
I haven't seen a MO vendor that was video
recorded in years. It wouldn't surprise me
if the MO companies didn't require it. I
don't intend to spend my time researching it.
Nor do I. It was you that made the claim, however. The burden of proof is
yours, not mine.
Citation to
Fuck Jim's CDR.
The WWA images were available only through the PACER
subscription service, so they are not likely to be archived
on the Web unless somebody else did it.
We downloaded many, but not all of them, and not all
provided full copies of filings; some offered only the first
page.
Jim Choate[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
You're one to talk.
Money order sales are recorded on video camera. Each money order has a
time stamp with vendor ID. I can't speak for youk, but it would take me as
a LEA about 5 minutes to take a money order, find the vendor, and get
subpeona on
Jim Choate[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
You're one to talk.
Money order sales are recorded on video camera. Each money order has a
time stamp with vendor ID. I can't speak for youk, but it would take me as
a LEA about 5 minutes to take a money order, find the vendor, and get
subpeona on
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 06:53:03PM -0500, Trei, Peter wrote:
Jim: You really don't like to let facts to get in the way of your
brilliance, do you?
Check: https://www.anonymizer.com/signup/sign_up.shtml. To quote:
Yep, Lance has been far better than most in accepting cash/money
order/etc. I
See also:
http://www.politechbot.com/p-01860.html
-Declan
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 07:26:56PM -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
Somebody should tell Jim Bell...
http://slashdot.org/yro/01/03/28/2130219.shtml
--
Very interesting. Knowing the way government bureaucracies work, it's
probably just coincidence, but I wouldn't rule out a more sinister
explanation. Then again, all of Bell's motions that are in the online
docket would be in the physical one, too, so it's just security though
obscurity, at best.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 11:10:03AM -0800, Tim May wrote:
When the State has the power to take monies and then decide how and
when to dole them back out, it is using its coercive powers to
regulate behavior just as surely as if it had banned behaviors
outright.
Right. If only the
A US Federal Appeals Court has tossed out the $109 million verdict against
anti-abortion activists who ran a website called "The Nuremberg Files",
which listed the personal information of abortion doctors, and cheered
whenever one of them was killed.
The Judge opined that as long as the
See also:
http://www.politechbot.com/p-01862.html
http://www.spamlaws.com/state/va.html
18.2-152.4. Computer trespass; penalty. B. It shall be unlawful for any
person knowingly to sell, give or otherwise distribute or possess with the
intent to sell, give or distribute software which (i) is
At 11:27 PM -0500 3/28/01, Declan McCullagh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 11:10:03AM -0800, Tim May wrote:
When the State has the power to take monies and then decide how and
when to dole them back out, it is using its coercive powers to
regulate behavior just as surely as if it had banned
Participants and spectators in Jim Bell's trial next week in Seattle might
be interested in this case, released by the Ninth Circuit today, concerning
the use of a web page to publish addresses of third parties, and whether
or not such publication is protected by the First Amendment where it's
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
Nor do I. It was you that made the claim, however. The burden of proof is
yours, not mine.
???
The claim is that it is unlikely there are any MO vendors which are not
protected by a video camera currently. In fact, probably haven't been for
quite
At one point, Jim refused to waive his right to a speedy trial,
so part of the rushed nature is due to his decision. (Perhaps a
conscious one to spend as little time as possible in jail. Or
perhaps he refused to waive that right before he knew he was not
going to get discovery documents, etc.)
In fact, Jim was quoted as saying -- I'm watching what I type since
the Feds appear to be watching this list and chatting among themselves
and other folks involved in this case about what is posted -- that
he explicitly was *not* going to violate the law.
-Declan
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at
Greetings from EDGAR Online!
Your trial continues! Since registering for the two weeks
free a couple of days ago, you've already received the IPO
Express Daily Report, with an after-market overview of
what's happening in the IPO market. But that's just the
beginning (literally - an S-1 filed
Remailers aren't for falsifying email transmission information -
they're for concealing and deleting that information.
You're not pretending that your mail originates at foo.remailer.net,
you're just not telling anybody how it got there.
Even a nymserver doesn't do that - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
isn't
50 matches
Mail list logo
