On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> Paying lip service to DOS compatibility is a burden. Thus, should we put
> it
> out of its misery?
>
>
Kill it with fire.
-peterb
PS: I think I said that when this last came up 5 years ago, too, but we
didn't want to offend our 2 DOS play
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Hi!
>
> ...
>
> Paying lip service to DOS compatibility is a burden. Thus, should we put it
> out of its misery?
Off with its head!
-J
--
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a ma
2011/4/7 Adam Borowski
> Paying lip service to DOS compatibility is a burden. Thus, should we put
> it
> out of its misery?
>
Yes.
--
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the natio
Hi!
The DOS port has been inoperative since 0.5, and it would take pretty
serious work to get it to work again. Also, due to Crawl's bloat, 640K is
no longer enough for anyone -- we quite often exceed 64M. There are no
machines with that much memory which can conceivably be stuck with DOS.
The
