Dear Richard,
In addition to Franco's comments, not all things having a temporal
dimension are activities. We'll discuss more next week.
I'd not think results of activities can be activities. Shoes are not
shoe-making.
We have here two aspects:
A) the legal declaration or convention
B) the
Dear Oeyvind,
What about:"”This class comprises beliefs in the correct reading or
scholarly interpretation of the overt message intended by an instance
of E73 Information Object (“source”), which is either taken to be
obvious in its original linguistic form or has been reformulated by the
Dear Richard
the case you describe clearly belongs to the category of “fiat spatial objects”
as defined by Smith and Varzi, as opposed to “bona fide spatial objects” i.e.
common physical objects. Smith & Varzi introduce this concept in several papers
of theirs - I am sending you, separately, a
Dear All
You may find the outline of the agenda for the forthcoming meeting here
http://www.cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/provisional%20agenda%20.pdf
all the best
Chryssoula
--
---
Chryssoula Bekiari
Research and
Hi,
Further to my previous question, and following a trawl through CRMgeo, I
have another one. :-)
How should one represent an administrative unit (such as Burgess Hill,
being the entity which is managed by Burgess Hill Town Council) using
the CRM? It's not a place (certainly not as defined in
> It is assigned to the Oyvind to investigate if it could expressed the
> following phrase without the use of the term “unambiguously” in the scope
> note of I9 Citation : “in which the interpretation of the source is
> formulated as a set of formal propositions or regarded to be unambiguously
