Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 490 -- E VOTE

YES I think it would be interesting to add an example from musical notation, but I do not have any available directly. This can anyway be done later if people agree it is a good idea. Regards, Øyvind > Am 10.05.2024 um 12:51 schrieb Eleni Tsouloucha via Crm-sig > : > > Dear all, > During

Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue, missing part of type

Dear Martin, E80 Part Removal has E7 Activity as a superclass, thus, a part removed without any agent being responsible is not intended it seems. As to accidents made by agents: we would have to distinguish between intentional act and accident in order to say accidents are not part removals.

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 576 (about ... entity of type)

Dear Martin, and all, if you are going to discuss aboutness I am really sorry I cannot be there and talk about it, but life is about many things, talking about teaching and semester start... Aboutness can be defined very wide (anything someone thinks and is willing to state relates to

Re: [Crm-sig] E-VOTE: LRMoo F31 Performance and properties

YES. Out of curiosity: what does Subproperty of: Outside of CIDOC CRM scope for R81 mean? Øyvind > Am 30.07.2023 um 03:40 schrieb Pat Riva via Crm-sig : > > Hello all, > > During the SIG meeting #56 in May 2023 in Heraklion, the LRMoo WG presented a > new approach to performances (see here

Re: [Crm-sig] EXTENDED DEADLINE: E-VOTE: LRMoo R10 is member of (has member)

YES Øyvind > Am 29.07.2023 um 23:17 schrieb Pat Riva via Crm-sig : > > Hello all, > > Not having had any votes during this vacation period, I'm extending the > deadline to Sunday August 20. That is the beginning of the IFLA congress > where the BCM Review Group meeting will be held and we

[Crm-sig] Open position in Cologne

Dear all, at the Department for Digital Humanities in Cologne a four year position as a senior lecturer and research associate is open, which i hope can be interesting for people on this list or their colleagues. For more details see: https://tinyurl.com/IDHstelle All the best, Øyvind

Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo R26

YES Øyvind > Am 20.03.2022 um 21:32 schrieb Pat Riva via Crm-sig : > > Hello all, > > Continuing with issues partially discussed but not actually voted at SIG#52 > in February. > > In the document for Issue 360: HW: F28 Expression Creation >

Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo class F27 and property R16

YES to all. Øyvind > Am 09.03.2022 um 00:18 schrieb Pat Riva via Crm-sig : > > Hello all, > > Following the discussion of F27 > > during SIG 52 in February, further work on revised scope notes for F27 and

Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote issue 517

YES Øyvind > Am 03.03.2022 um 20:50 schrieb Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig > : > > Corrected, my typo. > Best, > Christian-Emil > > > From: Crm-sig on behalf of Martin Doerr via > Crm-sig > Sent: 03 March 2022 20:38 > To: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr > Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] Call for

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: New Member.

Yes. Øyvind > Am 27.11.2021 um 21:21 schrieb Martin Doerr via Crm-sig > : > > Dear All, > > It is a great pleasure and honor for us to announce that the Palace Museum in > Beijing applies for CRM-SIG membership. > > I have received the following request from the Museum: > > "The Palace

Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling a simulated view on a physical space

tion, view directions and sections of physical features > defined by view focus. > > Best, > > Martin > > On 10/26/2021 10:58 PM, Øyvind Eide via Crm-sig wrote: >> Dear Florian, >> >> thank you for this interesting puzzle! >> >>

Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling a simulated view on a physical space

Dear Florian, in addition to the comments made by others, which makes a lot of sense too, I would offer the additional perspective that the resulting 3D model (with the added canvas) can be seen as a collage of the source 3D model and a digital reproduction of the photography / painting — thus

Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling a simulated view on a physical space

Dear Florian, thank you for this interesting puzzle! Before I venture into concrete suggestions, allow me to ask some question in the form of assumptions you can confirm, reject, or discuss: The establishment of a hypothetical viewpoint is used to establish a location of the canvas. That

Re: [Crm-sig] Linked Places mapping

For work on gazetteers I would suggest to bring in Humphrey Southall. https://www.port.ac.uk/about-us/structure-and-governance/our-people/our-staff/humphrey-southall He has been working on them for decades and argued they organise information in a way which is useful also in a digital world.

Re: [Crm-sig] Argument for an Instrument Class (and its property)

Really interesting distinction. When doing pre-digital surveys for maps we used the compass for direction (clearly an instrument, and active?) and bodily calibrated steps to count the meters of distances (clearly part of the human body). Still the results of these measurements were more or less

Re: [Crm-sig] evote: Issue 535 example of Pxxx represents instance of type

YES Øyvind > Am 02.07.2021 um 13:29 schrieb E. Tsoulouha via Crm-sig > : > > Dear all, > > According to the decision for issue 535 in the 50th CIDOC CRM SIG meeting, > the first example of Pxx represents instance of type should be reformulated > in order to capture the fact that the thing

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 493 (example templates)

YES > Am 18.06.2021 um 11:47 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig > : > > Dear all, > > This issue is about agreeing a rationale and a template based on which > CRMbase and CRM extension examples will be produced. The working document for > this issue is here: > >

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 384 (template for family models)

YES > Am 18.06.2021 um 11:56 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig > : > > Dear all, > > This issue is about agreeing a template based on which the specification > documents of CRM family models will be produced. The working document for > this issue is here: > >

Re: [Crm-sig] 511 e-vote

YES All the best, Øyvind > Am 19.03.2021 um 11:37 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig > : > > Dear all, > > At the last session of the last CRM SIG meeting we discussed issue 511 and > voted to accept the reduction of the range of property P39 measured from E1 > CRM Entity to E18

Re: [Crm-sig] New project, question for input

Dear Daria Hookk, This looks good! It is in cooperation with the EADH conference in Krasnoyarsk the same week, right? All the best, Øyvind > Am 15.03.2021 um 10:36 schrieb Дарья Юрьевна Гук : > > Dear friends, > we already announced the event but maybe not everybody heard, I am so sorry >

Re: [Crm-sig] New project, question for input

> Am 15.03.2021 um 10:15 schrieb Дарья Юрьевна Гук : > > There are academic institutions in Siant Peterburg (Russia) in contact with > Mongolian collegues realizing grants projects in arcives. > Hope they will be glad to participate. What do you mean ander 3-4 countries > if Russian

[Crm-sig] New project, question for input

Dear Colleagues, thank you for a good and fruitful meeting this week! In January, we started a new project funded by the Erasmus+ programme: ARTEST https://dh.phil-fak.uni-koeln.de/forschung/artest The aim of the project is to develop new MA