Dear George,
What I read in Martin's email is that Bekker numbers are examples of
identifiers for propositional content, not propositional objects themselves.
Which, it seems to me, is not so far from your thoughts :-)
Ciao,
A.
> Il giorno 10 gen 2024, alle ore 07:30, George Bruseker via
Dear Pat,
I confess that during the discussion at last SIG I was somewhat confused and
not at all convinced of the logical consistency of the relationship between R10
and R67 and I had retained many doubts at the end of the meeting. But the way
R10 has now been remodeled, stripping away any
Dear Christian-Emil, all,
I suggest closing this issue but not abandoning this topic which I still
consider extremely interesting.
A new issue that allows us to discuss about it could be an excellent compromise.
So I vote YES + “please open a new issue”.
Thanks and ciao,
A.
> Il giorno 14 feb
Great news!!
I vote YES.
A.
> Il giorno 27 nov 2021, alle ore 21:21, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
> ha scritto:
>
> Dear All,
>
> It is a great pleasure and honor for us to announce that the Palace Museum in
> Beijing applies for CRM-SIG membership.
>
> I have received the following request
Hello Martin,
Our HW for issue 546.
In the current version of the CRMtex model, TX6 Transcription can refer both to
the whole text (TX1) and also to fragments of it (TX7), being TX7 subclass of
TX1. This allows scholars, when required, to use TX6 also for the transcription
of a single glyph.
Dear Martin,
Our HW for issue 545.
A grapheme is atomic by definition as it represents the minimum unit (i.e., a
unit that cannot be further decomposed) of a writing system.
Furthermore, the grapheme is a conceptual and non-concrete unit and is made
manifest by the individual act
Dear Martin,
Your observations are extremely stimulating, as usual, especially with regard
to the observation of a linguistic object which is a very complex and
articulated operation. In our view, in particular, the following conditions can
occur while a linguistic object is observed:
1. I
I vote YES.
A.
> Il giorno 18 giu 2021, alle ore 11:47, Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig
> ha scritto:
>
> Dear all,
>
> This issue is about agreeing a rationale and a template based on which
> CRMbase and CRM extension examples will be produced. The working document for
> this issue is here:
Dear All,Please find enclosed my HW for issue 533 (disambiguation of polysemous concepts used as ontological classes).This document is also available in the related folder of the "Issues; Working Documents” shared drive
Dear Thanasis,
I also tend to be in favour of your option 3 because in my opinion, the
planning problem is transversal and concerns many disciplines and many areas,
not just the social one. Recently, I have been working on the modeling of
laboratory analyses, their preventive planning and the
Dear Martin,
These are very interesting and suggestive considerations.
I will definitely treasure them.
Bests,
Achille
> Il giorno 27 mar 2021, alle ore 11:32, Martin Doerr ha
> scritto:
>
> Hi Achille,
>
> That is basically no problem. It can quite easily be formulated in FOL that
> at
Dear Martin, Christian-Emil,
Thank you for the interesting insights. For the scenario described by Martin I
fully agree with what he writes and surely it makes sense to consider an
embedding as distributed among different layers in the very common case in
which it spans over multiple and
Dear Christian-Emil,
I understand the practical need of this operation, but I also fear that this
may cause further conceptual inconsistencies since, I imagine, in no way an
embedding can be embedded in an A3 as the latter is a feature.
I think it would be more fruitful to apply a constrain on
Dear George, all
For the Italian translation, you can certainly count on me as well :-))
Ciao,
A.
> Il giorno 10 mar 2021, alle ore 09:49, George Bruseker via Crm-sig
> ha scritto:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I, too, fully support this important initiative and hope to learn much from
> colleagues in
Dear Christian-Emil, Martin,
I cannot help but continue to think that an embedding is something more
immaterial than an S20, for which E3 seems more adequate to me, especially in
cases where it is necessary to indicate the position, orientation and other
modalities of placement of an object
15 matches
Mail list logo
